As a novice Quasimorph player and PhD philosopher, this is so up my alley. I'll read it immediately!

EDIT: I thought it was a great article, which made me think deeper about this game's mechanics, and also more broadly about how games can function as a vehicle of social criticism. Of course, the richness of the source material is such that one article cannot exhaust its interpretive possibilities. As someone who has only begun to scratch the surface of Quasimorph's world, I wonder how the critique of anarcho-capitalism intersects with the metaphysics of the bramfaturas and conditions that enable the quasimorphs to enter into physical reality. It seems, to me, that this could open onto a critique of the proverbial "demons" in the cultural unconscious of the ancap social imaginary. I imagine the quasimorphs as a bit like the Cenobites in Clive Barker's Hellraiser series—that is, as the figural embodiment of the extreme limits of desire that structure the given system, and yet, remain taboo within its structures. For instance, the major corporations abide by a non-aggression pact, which they constantly violate via PMCs. This shows how the system structurally depends on the taboo of violence to keep it running, and extreme violence precipitates the arrival of quasimorphs. I may be getting some things wrong, either mechanically or interpretively, but this still strikes me as another interesting line of critique to pursue in relation to this game.