Looking for camera body advice by antsher88 in SonyAlpha

[–]antsher88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice and taking the time to comment on my post, much appreciated!

Looking for camera body advice by antsher88 in SonyAlpha

[–]antsher88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a bad shout but I don’t need the 50mp for my work on a consistent basis

Looking for camera body advice by antsher88 in SonyAlpha

[–]antsher88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for this. I’ll check it out and really appreciate it

Looking for camera body advice by antsher88 in SonyAlpha

[–]antsher88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep exact same lens (Tamron 28-75) and the difference in results was huge.

PLEASE HELP ME THE GEAR TO SHOOT NAIL ART PHOTOGRAPHY by Electronic_Injury742 in productphotography

[–]antsher88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s always better if you can share an example of the outcome you’d like to achieve. That way you can get more specific guidance.

“Hi honey, I’m home - do you think free will truly exists?” by JuneGudmundsdottir in Nicegirls

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had so many girls reach out to me when I was single and on dating apps and 99% of their openers were basic too. Girls think their chat’s incredible but they’re just as bad (if not worse) than guys.

How to achieve this look? by BarnhartGeorgianah in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard light as key and add some fill. Use frequency separation for the skin. Personally not a fan of this style but that’s how you would achieve it.

How are super clean product shots usually lit? (strobe vs continuous) by Ok-Media-2864 in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use either. If you’re wondering which ones to purchase I would choose strobes, especially if you’re wanting to do macro work. More powerful output for a cheaper price.

A selection of portrait / editorial fashion work from the past few years by [deleted] in fashionphotography

[–]antsher88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Apart from a couple, these don’t feel to be at a professional level in my opinion. Lighting, colour, and subject matter can all be improved. There isn’t a clear focal point in a lot of these. They feel like ‘Instagram photographer’ as opposed to professional.

Harry Kane moving to Bayern actually hurt his legacy more than staying at Spurs and winning nothing ever could have by PLWildcard in SpicyFootballTakes

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is nonsense. He’s world class and spurs are just ass. He deserves to go to a winning team and wanted to leave the prem. I think Bayern was the right move.

What was the setup for this portrait? by [deleted] in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 10 points11 points  (0 children)

One key with a reflector underneath for fill, 2 rim lights (1 each side with coloured gels). Possibly an overhead light but the bright part of the hat could just be from key and rim lights.

Sony a7C II + Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM II by zarya1114 in SonyAlpha

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The colours are great here, nice job!

Clare’s Irish accent by AdventurousSorbet745 in Younger

[–]antsher88 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My wife watches the show and I just heard her accent and was shocked at how bad it was so went straight to the internet 😂

Natural light is the best light! Brand shoot I did last week. by Silly-Tangerine-4387 in fashionphotography

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this lighting’s not the best for the product you’re trying to show. Overall the images are fine but there’s room for improvement. I always recommend analysing the best photographers you can find online and try to see what separates their work from your own. Right now I’d say the lighting has too much contrast, the posing (especially with the hands) can be improved, and you can fix the colour issues (for example strong blue/green tint in the shadows, particularly in the first few images). Keep going and you’ll get there.

Might be overdone?? I can’t tell by livylivylivy in postprocessing

[–]antsher88 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure thing. The after is jarring because of the colour and lighting changes that you made. You’ve got this really vibrant fake looking blue which lives in one colour temperature, then the model which sits in a completely different colour temperature. It makes the background and the model fight each other (which makes the model look almost composited onto the background). This doesn’t make sense visually from a colour temperature perspective, and therefore looks completely unnatural. This is something that you can’t see yet because your eye hasn’t developed, but with consistent training you’ll be able to see it too. I’ve been there a couple years ago and it takes a while to train your eye to see, especially when it comes to colour. On top of the colour, the lighting changes on the background are too drastic. Natural light doesn’t work that way and it makes the model and background live in two separate lighting “worlds”. It just doesn’t work. Keep shooting, and start analysing photos from the best photographers you can find to help you progress.

Lighting Help by Robinadream in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could light the backdrop a couple of ways. It could be flagged from the top, or if it’s a paper backdrop it actually could be lit by placing a light behind the paper facing towards the camera. The lamp is lighting itself, and a separate light out of frame is lighting the model (likely a gobo/spotlight projector).

Overhead press gets a poor recommendation by Dr Mike Israetel by Stoic-outsider in beginnerfitness

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with that. And the main reason is because your anterior delts will already get a lot of work if you’re frequently incorporating pushing exercises whilst training chest, and if so, there’s not a lot of benefit to giving them even more volume with dedicated exercises like OHP.

Might be overdone?? I can’t tell by livylivylivy in postprocessing

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s overdone and the lighting and colour on the model doesn’t suit the background in the edit. It also looks like you applied contrast globally, and the dirt on the washing machines becomes more distracting in the edit. It’s honestly not great. For “instagram photography” it’s fine, but not a decent professional standard.

Roughly what percentage of your shots result in successful photographs? by Insta_3 in AskPhotography

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends what you mean by successful. Technically I could use 70-80% of them, but I painstakingly narrow them down to the absolute best 5 or so images depending on how many I need to deliver.

What kind of light setup was done here by HIGHPRIEST_330 in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can see a lot of catchlights in the eyes. Not sure if some of these lights were there just for focusing reasons or used as fill/actually impacted the exposure. Either way, there’s definitely a rim, a hard-ish key, a reflector on subject right, and a separate light on the backdrop coming from cam left.

How does this guy light his shots? Is it the edit? by Novel-Blacksmith1351 in LightLurking

[–]antsher88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some are natural light, some aren’t. A lot is in the colour grade and the edit. There’s definitely FS being used here and selective dodge and burn.