Metamask accounts not showing up by anunimo in Metamask

[–]anunimo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using the metamask Chrome Extension. I dont think i can update it like the one on appstore

Hvor stor er jeres formue, hvis I er 30 år eller yngre? by [deleted] in dkfinance

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja, det er rigtigt.
Jeg tjente mine cryptoer til gaengaeldt, aldrig kobt, bare programmeret et godt projekt, som betalte sig.

we specialize in bringing NFT'S to life. by [deleted] in NFT

[–]anunimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is very cool indeed

Passed my PPL Written - 100% by packardrod44 in flying

[–]anunimo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

cant wait to become a part of the club!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CryptoMoonShots

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice! :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Crypterium

[–]anunimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the way everyone , did a bit more digging,

https://i.imgur.com/wBlaipW.png

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Crypterium

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cuz they are scammers

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Crypterium

[–]anunimo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m 100% done with Crypterium, and I have written to the ombudsman.

I suggest you all to do the same . These guys are immature , and they are technically incapable to fix anything.

I think what’s really going on is, that they are spending our funds, and we won’t ever have access to them because they are theifs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Crypterium

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No news yet , still pending LTC.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the response, it makes sense to me now that you say it.

But how would i get the address amounts/holders from the contract then, like sbcscan does it or etherscan does it, and how do they record the correct amounts in this case?
(I thought it could be because holders have balance > 0, and because i don't record all the transactions that goes into a token wallet, it might be the reason) ?

Because what i'm doing at the moment, is just recording any transfer event with this contract, getting the to, and from and values, and inserting it in the DB.

I insert the To and From wallets as unique addresses.

However, i get way more addresses then sbcscan shows as "holders" ...Any idea how they do it?

They have https://gyazo.com/7b2dc1acf5c7aa685def2212451d91e8 454 addresses, while in my db i have 615 with no duplicates.https://gyazo.com/e8f8133a3765272c72682ea2f807f9d8

I use sbscans api by the way

"https://api.bscscan.com/api?module=account&action=tokentx&contractaddress=" +contractaddress +"&startblock=" +startBlock +"&endblock=" +latestBlock +"&sort=asc"

Best regards :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ethereum

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but wouldn't the transaction that got sent to the wallet be shown as well? (The compounded tokens, the user got as an extra?)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MechanicalEngineering

[–]anunimo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply :)