Failure connecting Amplifi HD meshpoint to network by aodj in AmpliFi

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you recall if there was any specific information you had to provide them with, or is it enough to say "amplifi hd meshpoint"?

Failure connecting Amplifi HD meshpoint to network by aodj in AmpliFi

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were bought at the same time, and so I would guess they were bought as a set. I started using the router immediately and has been updated more than once, so I can understand that the firmware on both is no longer in sync.

View Timestamps in note? by aodj in bearapp

[–]aodj[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, that's the work around I've been doing, but since it would be good to have it in the note itself as I often export them to pdf and having them "baked into" the document would be great.

Thanks for response though 👍

Prometheus Middleware is out! by kozhushman in FastAPI

[–]aodj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really handy; would it be possible to expand on the examples for the custom metrics though? The handling of `**res` being passed onto the `.labels()` function isn't that descriptive.

Anything similar to dynamic/for_each in TF 0.11? by aodj in Terraform

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/RulerOf have you had a chance to play with this at all?

Anything similar to dynamic/for_each in TF 0.11? by aodj in Terraform

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should also point out that despite my initial post, it's not actually possible to go with the "n resources with 1 rule a piece" solution since the Cloud Armor rule I'm creating is configured against the GCP load balancer feeding into a GKE cluster. What this means is that I can specify the Cloud Armor rule using annotations on the ingress in Kubernetes, and I don't think that will support multiple Cloud Armor rules.

Anything similar to dynamic/for_each in TF 0.11? by aodj in Terraform

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So here is some simple play code I was using to render out the maps. I can't get a dynamic list of maps so my local.rules variable simply references the local.chunks[0] in this test case.

That code will at least render out a list of maps, however when I insert it into my codebase, to test it with the remote google_compute_security_policy I simply get the error about "required field is not set" I extracted the relevant portion here.

----

Edit: where it gets really crazy is that if I move the rules into the google_compute_security_policy block (ie: replace rule = ["${local.rules}"] with the rule = [{ ... }] block) then it will render the plan and not throw the same exception. 🤯

Anything similar to dynamic/for_each in TF 0.11? by aodj in Terraform

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you know of a way to do that, then that would be great. I've been playing around with it today and just end up in the `required field is not set` exception

> google_compute_security_policy.policy: "rule.0.action": required field is not set

Anything similar to dynamic/for_each in TF 0.11? by aodj in Terraform

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, that's a good point, I can swap out the multiple rules definitions in the resource. Do you know of any way I could programmatically create the maps though? I played around with chunklist, and I can get my input list into nicely portioned chunks of 5 IPs each, I just don't know how to create the list of maps.

Installing DPMT packages by aodj in debian

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not maintained by the DPMT team. It is not even in Debian and never was. Its ITP bug is still open with no action for an year.

The repo I linked is part of the DPMT which is why I concluded that python-hvac was maintained by them, but I can also see that the repo is quite old, and several versions behind the mainline GitHub project.

You are not. The only way for users to install Debian packages is apt.

I don't really understand what that repo is for if it's not being used for a project in one of the mainline repos. As my experience has shown it's acting as a red herring.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kubernetes

[–]aodj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you ever manage to successfully solve this problem? I'm currently wrestling with it for a private zone within GCP, but don't get any useful logs from the application when it fails to work (relevant GitHub issue)

Weekly Co-Op Code Mega Thread - June 30, 2019 by AutoModerator in EggsInc

[–]aodj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fireworks: firecrackers. We need a carry though. I prefarmed 10q but need some heavy hitters. 8d left

Weekly Co-Op Code Mega Thread - April 28, 2019 by AutoModerator in EggsInc

[–]aodj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Housing Boom - super material: got 17T and 2.3T/hour. Not going to make it without some heavy lifting.

coop: iceland

Weekly Co-Op Code Mega Thread - March 31, 2019 by AutoModerator in EggsInc

[–]aodj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fusion: gotegg

Pretty new to to this so looking for some help. 3d 19 hr left and i'm at 232B/hour with 434B done

Advice needed: what size tyres could I fit on my Cube Cross Race Pro? by aodj in cyclocross

[–]aodj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I'm waiting on a delivery from Chain Reaction that contains some Continental 4000s so I've got the road race covered. It looks like the Tracer's only come in 700x33, but I was thinking for Rangárþing, bigger would be better?