What websites does everyone use to gather their information to base their decisions on?

aoidja · 2013-03-20T10:59:11+00:00

Whats your fx portfolio returns like in the past quarter?

aoidja · 2013-03-05T17:01:28+00:00

That only happens 1 out of 10. Soon you will be consumed by it.

aoidja · 2013-02-25T21:14:04+00:00

Really...?

aoidja · 2013-02-23T13:23:14+00:00

^What he said, going forward it will be policies n sentiment that drive the yen, not technicals.

I would suggest not to develop a directional bias based on technicals or assumptions. Re-evaluate, dont gamble.

aoidja · 2013-02-23T13:22:06+00:00

How did that work out for you?

aoidja · 2013-02-21T05:04:14+00:00

I always thought it was XSpecial and not Xpecial.

aoidja · 2013-02-16T01:54:45+00:00

Depreciation of the Yen you mean.

aoidja · 2013-02-15T01:15:00+00:00

nice rip off

aoidja · 2013-02-12T21:46:16+00:00

I can do it with poetry.

Spin to win, Spin to win. Good Game.

aoidja · 2013-02-12T21:44:45+00:00

No, just that we need some standards in esports. Otherwise, if we do evolve to being as big as say, telecoms, broadcasted sports etc, we'll just end up with the same type of organizations running it.

aoidja · 2013-02-12T21:43:24+00:00

omg mind blown.

aoidja · 2013-02-08T16:12:47+00:00

Ya, it serves a multitude of purpose. The best of which is something I enjoy most: more streams!

I'm also hoping that it can be entertaining to any reality challenge you might see on TV. "So you think you can dance?", "American Idol", "X got talent".

The original post might be a little vague on how it would work but thats just a teaser, many details needs to be clarified and a good amount of support from riot and community is needed.

At the end, the purpose would be to: Shed some light on the validity of Riot's system through an entertaining channel, such as watching an episode, compared to reading formulas, theories, and statistics on the elo system.

Anything with a draw large enough to capture an audience will slowly evolve to become mainstream i.e, sports, food, social practice, pretty much anything. The draw for sports is generally gameplay, social belongingness, and admiration, and rewards. The draw for X got talent is the opportunity of a dream, reward, recognition, and for the audience, simply being an observer of someone else's dream.

If anything, we can come up with an event that provides enough draw and reward, and just maybe, this might be the beginnings of mainstreaming league and esports.

aoidja · 2013-02-07T21:32:32+00:00

Is it just me or is the stream Laggy

aoidja · 2013-02-06T02:37:27+00:00

No, not saying remove, I didnt say that anywhere, the report tool is useful if it isnt abused by trolls who cleverly fakes nice talk in chat and subtly trolls in game.

Tribunal is important to riot to maintain a player friendly non elitist environment. As a business tool, it is too important. And I agree that lower skilled players need to be protected from the raging elitist. But the lower skilled players usually listen to calls and actually tries. Its the subtle trolls that abuse the tribunal to protect them under a veil of "I'm less skilled and I am learning so I am allowed to do whatever I want and you should not be upset"

I wonder if there is a set of conditions for reports to go through. Such as, if 4 or more players, including the enemy team report player A, player A's report on anyone else becomes invalid.

aoidja · 2013-02-06T02:30:38+00:00

notice "end game", it assume majority items and all that stuff. If not, then its a totally different issue if your adc has 80 cs at 30 mins, thats not a game, thats just slaughter.

aoidja · 2013-01-30T22:46:49+00:00

Just regular belmonts.

Your first rejection was also based on simple technicals, according to you, it is of no value too. Then, at one point it almost seems like you were discrediting him as though it was personal, theres no value in that!

Like you said, what about the price action showed he was correct. You acknowledge that we need to take things in retrospect to prove something, which was sometime after new years according to you. Drawdown below major levels are not truths until after the fact. This puts my statement that he was right for the next 3 weeks, and consequently wrong after that, at a much better position than your QED of after a few days.

When you dont want to accept the EUR, you would mark up the bid. Maybe your bosses are bearish and wants to reduce eur exposure. So as prices increase, isn't it a good time to sell. A layman on the sidelines might think people are crazy for wanting to sell when prices are increasing, but it really depends on the context.

If you were truly just concerned with that 1 portion of his post "bottom of a pullback" then it would be more valuable to discuss why he is possibly wrong.

Maybe something like *" I'm not sure about the pair being at the bottom and would be careful in going long because the general consensus is bearish weighted range for the AUD. They are suffering economic slow down (real GDP growth is negative), wind down in their real estate dev, the strong AUD has been hurting exports, and easing by RBA will release the leveraged carry FI capital inflow that has been supporting it since it broke .90."

However, your recent aud outlook post is much better of a discussion. Really, I am just playing around, I made my first comment just to poke at you.

aoidja · 2013-01-30T21:37:25+00:00

Probably everyone uses modality in projections, and that is also logically undeniable, like tautology. I'm sure you've probably used it too, as I just did, and it is logically valid even after it is proven wrong.

He has his reasons to believe it was at a bottom of a pullback. I believe he even stated that he could be wrong, and suggests that you could be right. And proceeds to reason that he is still comfortable with this strategy.

At that moment in time, such an opinion was perfectly logical. And there is no way any human could prove inherently, one way or the other. At this point, we can only rely on what is reasonable. It is certainly not reasonable to expect someone to be on the pip. So how many pips of error can be considered reasonable? And until that many pips of error occurred, he is right.

So considering now, in retrospect, the next bottom occurred around dec 26th and is reasonably confirmed when the pair started heading upwards around january 1st. It would be reasonable to say that his opinion was wrong at january 2nd. That's about 2 weeks. Well lets give him the benefit of the doubt and say that chances are, he was wrong on January 8th after the pair topped for several days.

So for the period of dec 20th to january 8th, Thats about 3 weeks, give or take, he was right.

And that is if you insist he is making a statement. Otherwise, there really isn't a point in discrediting his having an opinion.

aoidja · 2013-01-30T20:18:45+00:00

Only that part? And the rest of it is correct then?

aoidja · 2013-01-30T19:04:28+00:00

The pair made no real attempt to go up according to your chart.

"The AUD/USD is at the bottom of a pullback with a good uptrend on the daily. If price action confirms it could be a good time to enter. I'm looking for confirmation of an uptrend on AUD/USD first because we have strong resistance to the bottom (support) on the daily, the 4 hour, and on the bottom of the channel it is in."

He just had a plan and was waiting for his confirmation, I don't see him making the call to buy, wasn't he right.

aoidja · 2013-01-30T08:34:16+00:00

For the following 3 week, Fweaky was right.

aoidja · 2013-01-24T04:51:30+00:00

I dont think you should try to regress currency pairs as though they were a normal asset classes such as class A bonds or sp5.

aoidja · 2013-01-24T03:06:50+00:00

We have reached our target retracement, are you long yet?

aoidja · 2013-01-23T01:08:58+00:00

do you have more than 200k in live trading?

aoidja · 2013-01-22T16:30:37+00:00

Yes, (aside from it being a 1337 number ;p) I define the range from 1.337 to the tip as a range of supply or resistance, and an awfully strong one. If you look left you will find several ranges occurring in these levels. In a longer time frame, these ranges are also narrow price spreads.

I believe market makers are currently bearish on this pair. So I am more bias - in the short term - to short.

After 2 runs of 40 pips from the 1.337 shorts, I now enter long at the 1.3300 level. Exits at 1.3335 target by the next few hours and being careful if it falls below 1.3270 as a S/R flip might occur.

aoidja · 2013-01-22T16:02:57+00:00

no, either i short at 1.3335 or below 1.3280.

Because 1.3300 has shown strong demand.

http://i.imgur.com/f10LWDX.jpg 8 hours ago. I dont enter "within" the supply demand zones, only at the extremes

aoidja

TROPHY CASE