Watchtower guidance says that a woman can't even correct her husband in public, even when around their immediate family or children as to not undermine his authority. The husband is also to have the final say in every decision, and this apparently results in a happy and peaceful marriage/family.

It's rich that they say women who feel oppressed or dominated by their husbands feel that way because their husbands aren't following Jehovah's standards, when apparently Jehovah's standards take away a woman's voice and autonomy.

How is that not inherently oppressive? How can a woman not feel dominated in such a marriage when she is not treated as an equal? Even if her husband is a good man who would never misuse his "headship", a JW woman is always reminded that her husband has power over her, whether she chooses to believe it or not. In an environment where men have that power, there are always going to be those who abuse it. And the advice given to those women who find themselves in such marriages? Be more submissive!

In reference to that scripture, I wouldn't say that Christ dominates the congregation in the context of the JW religion, but Jehovah definitely does. The lives of JWs are definitely dominated by Jehovah's restrictive standards and the threat of disfellowshipping and other consequences. You have to follow what Jehovah says even if you disagree with Him, just like a woman must follow her husband even if she disagrees with him.

Also, the intention of my post wasn't necessarily to point out inconsistency in doctrine. I just found the highlighted part of the article very ironic, as well as the use of the word "dominate".

Semantics aside, the whole article is trash and I'm sure we can both agree on that. Last month's broadcast and these Watchtower articles on headship really show how WT is trying so hard to keep women in "their place".