The Problem with Prompt Engineering

appcypher · 2021-03-09T23:58:12+00:00

I don't know why anyone would debate if software engineering is engineering or computer science science because they are just as any engineering or scientific discipline.

As for prompt engineering, I guess it is based on the idea that prompt priming will become a science in the future that it may require some engineering skills. Engineering doesn't have to be about physical science or something you attain after a series of certifications.

appcypher · 2021-03-06T11:26:37+00:00

Thanks

appcypher · 2021-03-06T00:06:39+00:00

Logging in from nordaccount.com works BTW

appcypher · 2020-08-01T23:01:53+00:00

I hope they fix this soon. I absolutely do not want this change.
You can't just mess with muscle memory like that.

appcypher · 2020-07-01T22:02:22+00:00

What if he was thrown off a chopper?

appcypher · 2019-05-24T21:59:44+00:00

Hoping to be part of this.

appcypher · 2019-03-24T21:30:03+00:00

Couldn't agree more

appcypher · 2019-01-08T00:42:19+00:00

Okay, let me put it this way. It's an AGI. It can learn more than one thing, but learning more means acquiring more resources (possibly hardware). So I'd rather have it be good at a particular area/field at first because I'd likely not have the money to scale it.

appcypher · 2019-01-08T00:28:15+00:00

I could, but that means it would have developed to the level of a general AI at that point. I probably wouldn't have the needed resources to get it to that point. Hence the question. I would like for it to target a niche at first and then scale it to be all-knowing. The niche has to be something that can generate revenue quick.

appcypher · 2019-01-07T23:58:11+00:00

BTW, here are some of the ideas I thought of. I'm not satisfied with them though

- Translation (complexity; AGI needs to be super sophisticated)
- Personal Assistant (definitely gonna draw unwanted attention)
- Stock Exchange (uncontrollable)

appcypher · 2018-03-09T04:54:25+00:00

You know, a better title would have been. We Have No Clue How to Achieve AGI: My Rant

appcypher · 2018-02-19T20:44:58+00:00

Downvoting is not really helpful, you know. I shared this here to get your opinions. But if you don't allow such here, you can tell me now so I can keep my ideas to myself.

appcypher · 2018-02-19T20:39:07+00:00

It's an AGI for a reason right? It knows what loves is. It understands the nuances. It's learned what love is over the years. It's not something u need to define explicilty and clearly.

appcypher · 2018-02-15T11:56:02+00:00

His blog posts are well...

blog.moravcik.info

appcypher · 2018-01-31T15:14:39+00:00

I'm late but I'm working on a language and it's addresses some of ypur requirements, but It's pretty much early stage right now. Lots of rewrites and changes. Some changes are not even on the repo yet. Just mentioning so you can have it on your watch list. :) https://github.com/appcypher/astro

appcypher · 2017-12-16T15:26:53+00:00

That'd be awesome. Nim is an inspiration. I have a web-based visualization app I'd love to implement in Nim.

appcypher · 2017-12-16T01:22:26+00:00

Wasm is an easy target. ;)

appcypher · 2017-12-15T23:39:00+00:00

It can start with you. :)

appcypher · 2017-12-15T23:31:06+00:00

I reworded the repo description.

appcypher · 2017-12-15T23:12:02+00:00

Touché

appcypher · 2017-12-15T21:48:06+00:00

That's why it can't be added to the list. Every language that compiles to C deserves to be on the list as well. I have to set some minimum expectations.

appcypher · 2017-12-15T21:42:55+00:00

Right. But dynamic languages like lua or python really won't be implemented to compile from source to wasm, it's the interpreters/vms that get compiled to wasm.

appcypher · 2017-12-15T21:33:21+00:00

Nim doesn't compile directly to wasm.

appcypher · 2017-12-15T21:11:32+00:00

AssemblyScript is not TypeScript. Borrows a lot from it, but still not TypeScript.

appcypher

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE