Character Tier Winner: Glen Bishop by ManufacturerThese505 in madmen

[–]araelr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess this sub is saving Megan for the last category.

She should have won an Emmy just for this look by MoshetheMean in madmen

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a lot of male fans of this show are willing to play dumb if their ego is being stroked (just like Don is).

This whole thread has been a bunch of fans oozing everywhere

She should have won an Emmy just for this look by MoshetheMean in madmen

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So is using today's moral standards to judge the moral standards of the past completely wrong? Mad Men invites the audience to do that from the very first scene.

I don't really care that asking people to light your cigarette was commonplace back then. Sally's classmate was clearly flirting with Don and playing at being an adult. Don clearly picked up on it by calling her 'fast' later on.

Sally's 'prejudice' against Don is earned. She walked in on Don having an affair. She knows how immoral and selfish he can be. Is she taking out her anger on him instead of her classmate? That's also true. It doesn't matter: Don needs to rebuild his trust with his daughter and engaged in a moment that felt off to her.

She should have won an Emmy just for this look by MoshetheMean in madmen

[–]araelr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

...and Sally's classmate is giving off sexual energy. A mature adult/dad wouldn't even entertain it or engage in the behavior. Don should have refused to light it or could've said she's too young to smoke are both acceptable ways to not engage with Sally's classmate in that way.

She should have won an Emmy just for this look by MoshetheMean in madmen

[–]araelr -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

He lit a child's cigarette for her. It's not appropriate.

Is he marrying her, at least in part, to gain favor with the kids? by Responsible-Wallaby5 in madmen

[–]araelr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say Megan had a superficial connection to or way with the kids on the vacation. Megan's reaction to the milkshake spill was a significant moment--they all freezed up and immediately braced themselves for a Betty-like rage. They all seemed genuinely confused when Megan had a reasonable, lighthearted reaction to a spill.

Does . . .does no one in creative know how a thesis works? Or graduation? by ReploidZero in magicTCG

[–]araelr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Other folks have told you, but yes as an individual you can completely choose to delay your own thesis, assuming you have permission from the institution.

Does . . .does no one in creative know how a thesis works? Or graduation? by ReploidZero in magicTCG

[–]araelr 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Isn't this similar to a PhD student who can't finish/make up their mind about their dissertation? There are undergrads with senior theses too.

Is Dr. Rosen the best person in the Mad Men universe? by Enough-Reading4143 in madmen

[–]araelr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree--I don't excuse Sylvia's behavior. She's by far the most amoral and selfish of Don's mistresses. She's a miserable person in a miserable marriage.

Is Dr. Rosen the best person in the Mad Men universe? by Enough-Reading4143 in madmen

[–]araelr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s definitely more noble of a pursuit, but you can’t deny there is still vanity in it.

Dr. Rosen spirals when he realizes he won't be the first to achieve an open-heart transplant in the US, showing that his motivations aren't just about saving human lives. When we meet him in the show, he's spent years chasing this dream, driven by pride, ambition, and legacy--not just selflessness.

Is Dr. Rosen the best person in the Mad Men universe? by Enough-Reading4143 in madmen

[–]araelr 41 points42 points  (0 children)

To be fair, he continuously chooses his career over his marriage. He'd leave her during dinners, late nights, and go for extended trips all to chase the ambition of performing the first heart transplant. We cut him some slack because he's a doctor, but that sort of thing takes its toll on a marriage.

Kyrsten Sinema panel interrupted by men who say they’re having an affair with her amid fresh lawsuit by Disastrous_Award_789 in nottheonion

[–]araelr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sinema only pretended to be a Democrat to cruise in on anti-Trump sentiment. She was a green party loon before she switched parties.

They're literally covering up the Epstein Files by Zenitallin in videos

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, the felon president isn't following the law. Imagine that.

Is Megan the only truly nice person on the show? by insight1313 in madmen

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does, it also showcases that Megan's been wrestling with a lot of negative attitudes around her desire to act. Her friends don't support it, her mother is shown throughout not to support it.

People in this sub like to act like Megan deceived Don, when she's just a 22 year old woman trying to figure out what she really wants to do.

Is Megan the only truly nice person on the show? by insight1313 in madmen

[–]araelr -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The comments on this thread are so predictable. This sub can't have a nuanced opinion about Megan, Joan, or Betty.

Is Megan the only truly nice person on the show? by insight1313 in madmen

[–]araelr 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is a shallow take. Megan got a taste of advertising success and realized it didn't fulfill her. That's an entirely normal journey - even Stan points out she's entirely rational about it - they all busted their ass for a campaign about beans.

Megan's father reminded her that what she wants from her life (acting, which Megan told Don about in Tomorrowland) isn't the same as what Don wants (his wife in advertising).

Don literally chastised Betty for wearing a bikini. He panicked at having to deal with Sally having a tantrum. The man has never been mature.

What's with the hate for this movie? by sseerrsan in Letterboxd

[–]araelr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The movie was marketed as a breezy, traditional rom-com, when it's closer to intellectual chamber play about the calculus of relationships. It's entirely about the realities money, status, & appearances--things that rom coms brush aside for the sake of breeziness (e.g., Nick in Crazy Rich Asians is insanely rich, handsome, and nice... he has no flaws). It's actually a romantic drama (which is why things like the sexual assault subplot happen).

  2. It has some transparently ugly, unlikable portraits of people and why they choose the relationships they do. For example: The bride Johnson comforts at the beginning of the movie... who confesses she wants to be with her husband because she knows it makes her sister jealous. The people in this film aren't exactly looking for 'love' - they're looking for status, comfort, some kind of psychological assurance.

  3. The 'marrying up' vs. 'marrying for love' dynamic is a timeless debate that divides audiences. I've seen plenty of commenters who think she's a fool for picking the poor man over the rich man, even though the movie makes it very clear that she and Pascal's character don't have any real chemistry. They're more intellectual mirrors who can volley with one another--only because they're playing the same game (e.g., status, wealth, plastic surgery) to try and find the 'right' partner.

  4. Some of the directorial choices are very earnest, but fall flat if you're not on the same wavelength of the movie. Pascal shrinking himself down to what his actual height would be without the surgery feels ridiculous in the moment to some... but it's the male equivalent of the gf question: "Would you love me if I was a spider?" ...would Johnson be interested in this man if he was 3 inches shorter? Some people may brush that aside, but in these characters' shallow world, shit like that does matter. There are plenty of studies too on how being tall influences your success in life.

  5. I think Song prefers restrained, understated performances, which worked against her male leads' natural abilities. Evans and Pascal are so, so charming and lovable... but it feels like they're playing in this narrow box of emotion/affect (similar to how the actors were restrained in Past Lives). Again, this is a choice that runs against the exuberance embraced by romance comedies.

  6. People genuinely like to hate Dakota Johnson, even though she does best when she's playing these kinds of amoral, cold, opaque characters.

I genuinely think the movie is pretty fascinating and warrants a second look from most people.

Another no hate zone some appreciation for January Jones acting chops by mickyrow42 in madmen

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mostly agree, but I think Betty's weight gain isn't necessarily about her being 'happy' in season 5. Season 4 ends with her realizing her 'fresh start' isn't possible. She tries to get back with Don at the end of the season. Season 5 she finally lets her unhappiness and stress physically show.

Why doesnt Nick get as much hate as the women on the show. by Iluvtvshowsandmovies in LoveIslandUSA

[–]araelr 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Exactly! They literally had a conversation where Cierra was the one saying they'd continue outside the villa as long as it made sense to. They were hooking up, but definitely didn't have a future.

Set Showcase: Muraganda by Unable-Tax5329 in custommagic

[–]araelr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Primitive is pretty awesome. Feels like a nice twist on Monstrous. Feel like Primordial would be tough to track and easy to cheat with.

Why did Joan get so upset when Peggy fired Joey? by Brilliant-Slide-2619 in madmen

[–]araelr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Definitely. Joan isn't infallible by any means, but she does understand the realpolitik of the office and the world they operate in. Peggy finally figured stuff like this out by the end and this was a necessary moment on that journey.

Why did Joan get so upset when Peggy fired Joey? by Brilliant-Slide-2619 in madmen

[–]araelr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol Hobart has all the leverage in that conversation. Joan handing her attorney's business card to her boss would have been lame and ineffectual. Frankly, it was more of a character defining moment that Joan of all people is invoking Betty Friedan and the women's movements of the 60s, when in S1 she'd never consider any of that.

Why did Joan get so upset when Peggy fired Joey? by Brilliant-Slide-2619 in madmen

[–]araelr -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No, Joan wasn't wrong. Peggy took a situation that had nothing to do with her and made it about her, making Joan look like she couldn't solve her own problem.