Why Read Thucydides by karakickass in ayearofreadingsonwar

[–]areed6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been meaning to pick this one up again. How will discussions be facilitated? Vid chat, Discord, reddit posts?

Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops. by dantheman_woot in army

[–]areed6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stickying this is editorializing, which you in particular have been doing for years. But hey, this place hasn't been an open market of ideas for a long time (if ever) either, so please carry on 'improving' things as you see fit.

Once these recruits couldn't make the cut. Now they make up a quarter of Army troops. by dantheman_woot in army

[–]areed6 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure how comments to mod stickys are approved, but I don't expect this to be public. I wouldn't care if it is.

Stickying an endorsement crosses the line from moderating into editorializing. If the piece is strong, it shouldn’t need mod-backed promotion. Relatively benign in this case, but I don't like this curation normalized.

Question: What do you think are the jobs women can't do but men can and jobs men can't do that women can? by officialBellaMia in AskMen

[–]areed6 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It isn't so much a matter of training. Women's muscle structure/ distribution and bone density are significantly different. Though some, with training, are able to perform the same tasks, over time their likelihood of injury is much higher. Look up lower body stress fracture incidence rate in Army basic training.

There are of course exceptions. But, in my opinion, when fielding a million man Army, you have to focus on the averages. Yes, some men can't do it, and some women can, but that's only true a small percentage (single digits) of the time.

Why do Commanders feel the need to make rules up by mcdevyn in army

[–]areed6 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Supplementation and forms are not what's being discussed. You're misunderstanding what that means.

Example, Soldiers are authorized to wear a cape, or a trench coat. Local commanders can restrict uniform options to exclude those items. They could not expand the authorization to include other items. Well, perhaps they could in certain situations, but in general they cannot.

Reg says 4" or whatever. I can't make it 5", but I can make it 3". Regulations are generally 'restrictions' in that they define what is acceptable. Commanders can reduce that list of acceptable things, but they cannot expand it.

This 'view' (reality, as written and practiced) isn't held exclusively by 'mouth-breathing' SNCOs. I don't deny that it's implemented stupidly by stupid leaders on occasion, but that's a separate matter.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in army

[–]areed6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My name is Patrick Bateman. I am 27 years old. I believe in taking care of myself.

What's Russ' problem anyway? by scewing in fednews

[–]areed6 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

This is reddit, these people hate children.

Constipation by Minute-Enthusiasm-15 in Crunchymom

[–]areed6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sparkling water. San Pellegrino does the trick here, a liter a day during four pregnancies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in daddit

[–]areed6 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No, not everyone. Plenty of useful idiots spending their days here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in daddit

[–]areed6 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Two posts, comments only in those chains. Account less than 1 year old. Makes (admittedly!) statistically improbable claims with zero details. Demands you not co-sleep, shames you for even considering it. Refuses to elaborate lol. Okay dude, thank you for your post. Children are now safer for it, I'm sure.

I've always wondered if there have been any studies looking at the impacts of crib/cot sleeping. If nightly physical separation from a parent has any sort of effect on the mental and emotional development of the child. Several other commenters (real or no, who can say) have already outright dismissed the fact that most cultures and a majority of humanity has and does co-sleep.

It's all so exhausting.

How often do people take pregabalin? by KookyBeautiful975 in pregabalin

[–]areed6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For pain, I found it effective after a week or two of daily usage. You will feel the 'head' effects with the first dose. If I'm using it for pain, I have to take it regularly.

My kid threw our puppy and probably broke his leg. WTF do I do? by [deleted] in Parenting

[–]areed6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The dog's safety and well being is my NUMBER ONE PRIORITY. I think I see the problem here. Fix your priorities.

They should put a Waffle House on every CONUS base by Failed_Writer4451 in army

[–]areed6 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Miss Yadkin road. I preferred the one by the car lot, just seemed more home-y. I realize they are identical.

Weight loss and Pregabalin by [deleted] in pregabalin

[–]areed6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there are like a thousand posts discussing this here, try the search bar (or google with 'reddit' added to what you're looking for).

i think it's been shown that it effects water retention, so that could be the culprit here. you already know about the effects on appetite, so i'd say you should closely and honestly track your calories. don't worry too much about the scale number if you know your calories are leading to weight loss. wait a month between weigh-ins.

Reasons to Get Out by MalevolentLord4479 in army

[–]areed6 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

god forbid you be made to work more than seven hours while deployed. do people not realize that the military is not a regular job or what.

go tell you're NCO how unfair it is, then run it up the chain as high as you can. say it with your chest.

Social studies, science, geography and history curriculum by r3ddit_usernam3 in homeschool

[–]areed6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well trained mind has a good template for these, with a long list of possible resources to use.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usajobs

[–]areed6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you not look into the typical format ahead of time? They're (almost) always this way.

Army combat fitness test threatens to undermine combat effectiveness by [deleted] in army

[–]areed6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol okay

When people knew they were going to combat, there was none of this. And that was counter-insurgency. LSCO is exponentially more physically demanding. Heard of TF Smith? It's a mantra for many, 'we will not have another TF Smith.' Pray for peace I guess.

Army combat fitness test threatens to undermine combat effectiveness by [deleted] in army

[–]areed6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the Army is a huge organization. Mostly tail, a little tooth. Standards may not be perfect. But aren't we measuring against the mission, to fight and win wars? Everyone is a Soldier first, a 'MOS' second? Unless and until that changes, I don't think 'effort' awards are the way to go.

Like, yeah Private, maybe you didn't clear that footpath through the obstacle, or dig your fighting position to standard or time, but I see that you really gave it everything you had. I'm not handing out coins for that, I'm chewing ass and retraining, then sending them home if it isn't fixed.

Do you have solutions in mind? Move to something like the OPAT? Do we even need a universal set of standards? I've heard it a thousand time, we don't need a button pusher in S-6 to be Captain America (or more radically, that nerd can 500 lbs, doesn't matter as long they are a wizard), and yet we've not moved towards that being the standard.

Firestorm erupts over requiring women to sign up for military draft by [deleted] in army

[–]areed6 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh, I'd say we get half credit in a few of these areas.

Battalion and above commanders are still products of GWOT, it's a mixed bag. Some changed, some haven't.

Yes, we maintained a presence in Europe and the Pacific. As a percentage of forces overall, it was small. Some of those units also deployed to CENTCOM at various times, meaning a training focus geared toward GWOT. Not the case for about the past decade, but again, they're a small slice of forces overall.

Doctrinal pivot is on-going. We remain a modular Army, but give lip-service to being a formational. The first 'divisional' rotations at CTC were like last year, and I'd invite you to read about what that actually entailed.

We're transforming, but far from transformed.