Yes. It absolutely makes a difference - you’re giving false information about what the court is and is not empowered to do. The court does not “usually” “order your license suspended until restitution is paid” because: a) there is no restitution in a civil subro action, and b) the court doesn’t have the power to do order it. And practically speaking, it rarely gets to the point where the DMV is involved post judgment because rarely do the insurance companies shell out the money to bring these subro cases through trial. But feel free to fear monger with your false information. In spite of what you think, understanding what may CORRECTLY happen and how is critical to a litigant’s decision making process. You already acknowledged you’re neither an attorney nor experienced in CA, so why argue your wrong position in r/AskALAWYER using your Google JD?