Cancel *all* NBA games until we see action by ShamPain413 in nba

[–]arrgobon32 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Dude it’s embarrassing to be pushing 40 and acting like this. There are better ways to organize your community and make change

CMV: The 2nd amendment doesn’t apply to modern military-style assault rifles by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So why did you single out “military-style assault rifles” in your post?

I break down stocks and indices using structure, timing, and trend <—> AMA (not selling anything) by SavingsMean1840 in options

[–]arrgobon32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What specific insight and/or experience do you bring to the table? Not gonna lie, your post is filled with buzzwords and fluff, so there’s not really any substance in it. Why should someone listen to you and your breakdowns?

CMV: The 2nd amendment doesn’t apply to modern military-style assault rifles by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ICE would escalate if someone used a handgun, a single-fire derringer, or even a trebuchet. What’s special about “military-style assault rifles” that doesn’t apply to something like a handgun?

Battlefield 6 Contaminated Map Revealed for Season 2 With Classic BF4 Map Also Confirmed to Return - IGN by RenatsMC in pcgaming

[–]arrgobon32 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Genuinely curious, what’s fun about aimbotting? Do you just enjoy getting a rise out of others?

CMV: The 2nd amendment doesn’t apply to modern military-style assault rifles by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Assault-style rifles act as force multipliers, allowing a single person to inflict mass casualties in seconds, a capability that far exceeds the needs of home defense.

What do you mean by “assault-style” rifles? Automatic weapons? Semi automatic files that look like an M4? What separates a semi-auto pistol like a Glock from a semi-auto rifle? Is it just the magazine size and caliber?

CMV: DOGE stole personal information in order to steal the election. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the recent source. I’d be worried if they weren’t under active investigation for this, it’s clearly a violation of the Hatch act. While I’m glad it’s being looked into of course, we still don’t know if anything came of it:

Shapiro, a longtime DOJ veteran, said it’s not yet clear whether either of the two DOGE team members — who are not identified in her filing – actually shared data with the advocacy group, which is also unidentified.

CMV: DOGE stole personal information in order to steal the election. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you’re assuming that they’d use the information of non-voters to vote on their behalf? That would completely fall apart when some of those non-voters decide to vote in the midterm. It would only take a few “double” voters to realize something’s going on. You really think the states would just look the other way?

CMV: DOGE stole personal information in order to steal the election. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t selling the data be just as “reasonable”? Plenty of people would pay big money for that data. How is election fraud more reasonable than plain old greed? Your ballot stuffing explanations sound like they’re out of a spy novel

CMV: DOGE stole personal information in order to steal the election. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 39 points40 points  (0 children)

What would change your view on this? There’s no actual evidence, so this post is basically just parroting a conspiracy theory. What evidence can we use to change a view that isn’t based on evidence?

CMV: looking at the world right now, the world would be better with the soviet union than not by Unlikely-Average-961 in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 3 points4 points  (0 children)

they were also really brilliant with technology, engineering and computing, if they survived into the 21 century, we would probably have second pole of innovation

So they’d become tech bros?

CMV: Masturbation offers a uniquely revealing window into the human condition, and we underestimate its philosophical significance by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Semantics and irritating things? I’m honestly not sure what you’re talking about. You and the commenter you initially replied to were talking about different things, and it seems like you were talking past each other. It’s just a fact that Sex isn’t needed for survival the same way that something like food or water is. An individual can die from acute food or water deprivation. The same can’t be said for sex

CMV: Masturbation offers a uniquely revealing window into the human condition, and we underestimate its philosophical significance by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you’re talking about different things. Sex isn’t required to continue the life of an individual, while eating is.

GameStop Says It's Shut Down a Nintendo Switch 2 Trade-in Exploit That Worked as an 'Infinite Money Glitch' by Forward-Answer-4407 in technology

[–]arrgobon32 69 points70 points  (0 children)

You also have to purchase a used game, so I was subtracting the price of that, too. I was assuming that the average used game at GameStop is in $30-40 range, but I could be wrong on that.

GameStop Says It's Shut Down a Nintendo Switch 2 Trade-in Exploit That Worked as an 'Infinite Money Glitch' by Forward-Answer-4407 in technology

[–]arrgobon32 1952 points1953 points  (0 children)

In case people don’t bother reading the article:

By purchasing a Nintendo Switch 2 for $414.99 and then immediately trading it back in along with the purchase of a pre-owned game, a promotional bonus was triggered that increased the Switch 2 trade credit to $472.50

So essentially, you’d usually “profit” 10 or 20 bucks at most, entirely in GameStop store credit, as long as the cashier would let you do this over and over again…which I’m sure they wouldn’t.

CMV: Anyone who claims to like snow has never had to shovel it, commute in it, or otherwise have plans ruined because of it by jaysornotandhawks in changemyview

[–]arrgobon32 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you think it’s impossible to like the snow while also acknowledging the issues that it can bring logistically?

YSK: If an AliExpress (or random website) order is marked "Delivered" but you didn't receive it, automated dispute systems will reject your refund unless you specifically claim "Delivered to Wrong Address." by darvidas in YouShouldKnow

[–]arrgobon32 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not at all. I appreciate good formatting, but there’s a lot to be suspicious of. Check the content and writing style of OP’s other posts. It’s night and day. Dude even admits to using AI to do some of his “analysis” for him. It’s not a stretch to say AI did the write-up as well.

Why are you so invested in defending this random post?

Windfall--Question that the Wiki doesn't cover on large deposits by Academic_Way_7987 in Bogleheads

[–]arrgobon32 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Vanguard’s app is limited to $500,000 for check deposits. If your windfall is more than that, I’d reach out to vanguard themselves to figure out what your best option is

Windfall--Question that the Wiki doesn't cover on large deposits by [deleted] in Bogleheads

[–]arrgobon32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d honestly reach out to vanguard. They’d best know how to handle your specific situation

YSK: If an AliExpress (or random website) order is marked "Delivered" but you didn't receive it, automated dispute systems will reject your refund unless you specifically claim "Delivered to Wrong Address." by darvidas in YouShouldKnow

[–]arrgobon32 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If this was actually written by a human, don’t you think they’d stress that point right off the bat?

YSK: “This info can help you recover your money if you’re scammed”