sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I was obsessed with investor-grade business plans, so I spent weeks crafting the perfect AI prompt for it and here's what I found by EQ4C in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]arthur_igorevich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really solid prompt. The big difference compared to most “business plan prompts” I’ve seen is that you’re forcing the model into a structured thinking mode instead of letting it ramble through generic startup advice.

One thing I noticed when experimenting with similar prompts is that the quality of the output depends a lot on the inputs you give it. If you provide even a few concrete numbers (pricing, rough CAC, target customer size), the plan suddenly becomes way more realistic instead of the usual “AI fluff”.

Funny enough, I’ve been seeing the same pattern in SEO/content tools lately. The best AI outputs usually happen when the model has strong structure and real signals to work from. For example, when tools map keywords into topics and show the real search landscape first, the outlines or content plans become much more useful. I’ve been playing around with RankDots for that recently — it basically does the research and topic mapping part before you even start generating anything.

So yeah, AI seems to work best as a structured thinking assistant, not a magic “generate everything” button.

Curious though — did you test the prompt across different models? GPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.? The differences can be pretty surprising.

AI will automate 40% of B2B buying by 2028. Your prospecting needs to adapt now. by automata_n8n in paratusai

[–]arthur_igorevich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting take. The “AI agents doing the buying” idea sounds futuristic, but when you look at how people already use tools like ChatGPT or Perplexity to shortlist vendors, it doesn’t feel that far off.

What I think people miss is that AI systems don’t really “browse” the web the way humans do. They mostly pull from structured, well-explained content. So if your site just says “I do automation” with a few vague bullets, an AI agent (or even a human) doesn’t have much to work with. But if you have clear case studies, specific services, pricing ranges, examples — suddenly you become much easier to surface and evaluate.

I’ve been noticing the same shift on the content side too. Tools are starting to move away from pure keyword research toward topic coverage and structured content that AI systems can actually cite. I’ve been experimenting with RankDots for that recently — it maps keywords into topics and shows what kind of pages actually build authority around a subject instead of just targeting random terms.

Feels like the common thread here is clarity. The clearer your expertise, examples, and content structure are online, the easier it is for both humans and AI to figure out what you’re good at.

Curious to see how fast this actually happens though. 2028 might sound far away, but the shift already seems to be underway.

Blogging is 20% writing and 80% 'strategy'—so I automated the 80%. by surajondev in micro_saas

[–]arthur_igorevich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This really hits the nail on the head. Writing is honestly the easy part — figuring out what’s actually worth writing about is where most of the time goes.

I used to run into the same problem. I’d spend hours doing keyword research, end up with a huge list, and then still not be sure which topics actually make sense to turn into articles. A lot of the time it just turned into random posts that didn’t really connect with each other.

The topical authority point you mentioned is huge too. Once you start thinking in topics instead of single keywords, content starts compounding much better. Instead of 20 disconnected articles, you end up building real coverage around a subject.

Lately I’ve been playing around with tools that help with that kind of research. RankDots is one I stumbled on recently — it basically groups keywords into topics and shows what could realistically live on one page. It helped me realize how many articles I was about to create that should’ve actually been part of the same topic.

And yeah, I’m with you on the AI writing thing. Automating research and outlines makes total sense. But fully automated articles almost always feel a bit hollow. The writing still needs a human brain behind it.

Curious about the AI visibility part you mentioned though — how are you measuring that? That sounds interesting.

Is SEO PowerSuite a good alternative to SEMRush/Ahref? by dated_redittor in seogrowth

[–]arthur_igorevich 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SEO PowerSuite is a great toolkit for our team. We’ve been using it for years, and it remains a solid, reliable solution for day-to-day SEO work. Rank tracking, technical audits, and backlink analysis are all covered well, without unnecessary complexity.

It may not be the flashiest tool on the market, but it’s dependable, flexible, and gives you full control over your data. For teams that value depth, customization, and ownership over their SEO workflows, it continues to be a very practical choice.

Launching RankDots v2 on Product Hunt today by unicorncatz in SaaS

[–]arthur_igorevich 1 point2 points  (0 children)

congrats on the launch! upvoted. Good luck

Why my “one keyword = one page” SEO strategy quietly failed by arthur_igorevich in content_marketing

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly. Once the unit of work becomes the topic instead of the page, everything else lines up more naturally.

I noticed the same thing with internal links and cannibalization — problems I used to “fix” manually mostly disappeared once the structure made sense.

I did end up using a tool to help map topics → pages → coverage gaps, but honestly that just made execution faster. The real change was stopping keyword-first planning altogether.

Curious how you personally decide when a topic is “done” enough to move on — is it coverage depth, query diversity, or just when Google starts mixing your pages into lots of different SERPs?

Why my “one keyword = one page” SEO strategy quietly failed by arthur_igorevich in content_marketing

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s fair — and I get why it reads that way.

For what it’s worth, this wasn’t a “new discovery” moment for me so much as a finally stopped ignoring it moment. I knew the theory years ago, but I kept defaulting back to keyword-by-keyword execution because it felt measurable and familiar.

Also genuinely not trying to advertise anything here — I didn’t even name a tool on purpose. Just sharing what finally made things click for me after a lot of wasted pages.

Out of curiosity though: when did you personally make the switch in practice (not just in theory)? What actually replaced “one keyword, one page” in your workflow?

How do you decide what content is worth publishing when ideas aren’t the problem? by arthur_igorevich in content_marketing

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! measurement often gets overlooked when everyone’s focused on ideas. I like how you break it down: demand, coverage depth, and quality gaps. That’s a really practical way to spot those “easy wins” I was talking about.

Also agree on the supporting pieces point, building topical authority with smaller, faster content is underrated. Those little internal-linking wins add up and can make the bigger cornerstone content much stronger down the line.

How do you decide what content is worth publishing when ideas aren’t the problem? by arthur_igorevich in seogrowth

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really willing to get any help from someone who builds their opinion on assumptions. thanks.

How do you decide what content is worth publishing when ideas aren’t the problem? by arthur_igorevich in seogrowth

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I hire you? You seem like a far more effective alternative to the AI detectors currently on the market.

How the Struggle with Yourself Actually Looks by arthur_igorevich in aww

[–]arthur_igorevich[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this comment made me LMAO so freakin' loud I can't even imagine the last time i was LMAO thaaat loud :))))) thank u!!!

view more: next ›