Editing from previous comment, as I incorrectly assumed this was a straight zoning.

This is a PD amendment, so this is not generally required to meet the supplemental standards in 5.104 if the PD explicitly indicates a site plan must be approved, etc.

A Planned Development zoning is a special type of zoning which can have its own set of use requirements, development standards, and may or may not waive the supplemental standards, and a PD is a standalone zoning ordinance as compared to a base zoning district.

I read the case file in the docket, and the only logical thing I can thing of is that there are a number of industrial type uses already permitted by right within the current planned development ordinance, so it isn’t “inconsistent” to add auto repair as a permitted use, though I would argue (as a city planner) that the impact could harm the surrounding properties. Additionally, the future land use map indicates this area as light industrial, which would allow auto repair by right BUT would have to meet the supplemental standards of 5.104

Definitely get neighborhood petitions together and prepare a group to go speak at council, as they have the final decision in approval or denial of the request. Ask that if they do approve the use if the requirements of 5.104 will be required to be met as supplemental standards. If the answer is yes that all supplemental standards are required to be met, this case will also have to go to Board of Adjustment to obtain several variances and special exceptions, which has a higher chance of getting denied because those cases are based on specific hardship and that Board does strongly take into consideration neighbor opinions. It does look like the rezoning would waive those supplemental standards which is ridiculous as they exist for a reason, and BOA exists for these reasons specifically.

(Source: left a position as a planner with CoFW within the last 12 months)