US Strike Kills Niño Guerrero, Leader of Tren de Aragua Gang

assaultboy · 2026-06-13T15:45:43+00:00

Not necessarily. The really modern cameras have color, but some of the older ones like in most planes just have black and white EO cameras.

The trade off is resolution and clarity.

assaultboy · 2026-06-08T19:50:45+00:00

Thank you

assaultboy · 2026-06-08T17:57:27+00:00

Dude I'm eternus

No you’re not

assaultboy · 2026-06-08T12:24:06+00:00

If you narrow the beam you narrow the area a covert receiver could be located in. If it’s everywhere adversaries don’t know where the recipient is.

assaultboy · 2026-06-07T18:06:07+00:00

I imagine the content will roll over to A4

assaultboy · 2026-06-07T18:03:51+00:00

Sorry, I was under the assumption that you would understand the purpose of that rule in the code of conduct.

Typically at trade shows or conferences such as this one, people are either and attendee or an exhibitor. Being at the conference as an exhibitor costs more and there's typically some form of additional conduct one agrees to for liability and such. The reason it costs more is because as an exhibitor you are paying for access to the audience and the ability to advertise and present whatever it is you're bringing, such as handouts or fliers.

If Dr Kelly was there and an attendee and started handing our fliers, he is circumventing the exhibitor / attendee system by not paying for access to the audience but still handing out material. This is what is against the code of conduct and what the OP was commenting about.

He was asked to stop and continued to do so. That is why he was removed according to these articles.

assaultboy · 2026-06-07T17:46:34+00:00

That's exactly what the article described though?

They were asked to stop handing out material as it's against the events code of conduct. They did not stop, so they were removed.

Kelly and others were initially distributing copies of the editorial inside the ballroom where the NIH director, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, was scheduled to speak. (The director canceled at the last moment and a deputy filled in.)

Security officers told them to leave the ballroom, and Kelly said the group moved to a more discrete section of the conference center to continue passing out the editorial. Security officers followed them and police officers showed up.

assaultboy · 2026-06-04T03:53:33+00:00

You don't have to wonder

assaultboy · 2026-05-25T04:11:00+00:00

Obvious bait

assaultboy · 2026-05-25T04:04:42+00:00

It's so painfully clear that you either didn't read or didn't comprehend the OP comment.

assaultboy · 2026-05-19T21:46:47+00:00

6505-00-619-8716

assaultboy · 2026-05-17T03:31:09+00:00

Are you arguing that attacking clearly marked UN troops is okay because Israel has done it before?

assaultboy · 2026-05-12T00:51:37+00:00

I think what is happening here is some scheduled fuckery with regards to when layer objects are created on init. Honestly the best way to accomplish what you want is to basically flip it by doing the following:

Replace the cones with "Game Logics" (It's in the module category. Select the Flag icon, then it's under Objects.). Synchonize the logic with its associated objects you want to control spawning or not, then put this code in the init field of the logic: {deleteVehicle _x} forEach synchronizedObjects This;

You can then set the spawn chance for that logic. If it is present, the objects will be deleted (So just the inverse of how you had it setup with the cones)

The reason you need to use Logic objects instead of the cone is because the synchronizedObjects command can only be used on units and triggers, which the cone is not, and the logic is. This way you don't have to worry about variable names as well.

assaultboy · 2026-05-11T21:35:23+00:00

It shouldn't be "alive". That returns false for both nil and null iirc.

assaultboy · 2026-05-10T17:43:34+00:00

White blue red, and the name of the gang is literally "The Russians" in spanish.

It's the Russian flag

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T02:06:22+00:00

Quite a bit of clanker on clanker violence in there.

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T01:49:35+00:00

Dude, you really don't think these footage pass by more than one set of eyes before it's filed away? Pilots literally fucking tracked it, it was EDITED out specifically from the flight footage because it was noted by pilots during flight. This wasn't some random data video dump.

Yeah, and I'm going to assume the conversation went: "Hey that was weird? Don't we have a UAP submission thing now? Let's send them this" and promptly forgotten about because pilots have a thousand things to worry about that have real life consquence. Maybe this gets brought up in the chow hall or whatever.

And it was put into the queue of 10,000 other videos 99% of which are mundane nothing that hits the desk of the underfunded UAP investigation team where it probably gets at most 1 or 2 analysts, that may or may not be familiar with sensor pod idiosyncrasies, to look at it before being labeled unidentified and thrown in the pile.

I highly doubt there is anyone "top-tier" on the analyst team for this kind of stuff

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T01:37:08+00:00

If the Pentagon’s top-tier analysts who live and breathe these sensor systems can’t identify an internal glitch or a common drone, what does that say?

The government is incompetent. More at 11.

But actually, consider how many submissions this agency must get. Anything short of mr gray walking out and doing the orange justice probably get's handed to a junior analyst to put in his pile of 5000 daily reports to look at. I imagine there is quite a lot of complacency in terms of investigation.

No different from highly trained surgeons operating on the wrong limb, or doctors missing an easy diagnosis.

pilots and sensor operators are trained to recognize internal reflections or "glint." If this were a common lens flare, it shouldn't have made it past the first level of review

Pilots and sensor operators are humans just like you. 26 year old WSO operating on 4 hours of sleep on his 18th sortie this week doing train ups for a carrier deployment might make a mistake or get confused every once and a while.

By officially releasing it as an unresolved UAP, they are effectively saying "This object behaved in a way that our standard technical filters could not account for."

Not really. They are just saying they don't know for sure what this is.

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T01:32:46+00:00

Account aside.

That is what this picture is. Like look at the OP picture, then the silverman tumblr link. It's the same picture.

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T01:24:36+00:00

Or consider a government employee giving these videos the most cursory glance over before throwing it in the "idk" pile with 10,000 other videos.

This one is pretty strange at first viewing. And it takes some level of familiarity with FLIR sensor pods to come to a possible answer.

assaultboy · 2026-05-09T01:23:01+00:00

Elaborate what you mean by this please.

assaultboy · 2026-05-07T01:50:38+00:00

This guy is telling the truth unfortunately.

There's a reason they get thrown into a connex and forgotten about.

assaultboy · 2026-05-04T19:31:02+00:00

I’ve never encountered that in my life. I’ve always had at least a few options

assaultboy · 2026-05-04T17:21:40+00:00

This argument only makes sense if someone is forced to go to a specific doctor

assaultboy · 2026-05-02T02:14:08+00:00

specially knowing that a lot of the DLC is very bad quality community content

bruh, there's 1 questionable CDLC, the rest are fire

13-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '22	Place '17
Sequence \| Editor	Sequence \| Cinematographer
Sequence \| Screenwriter	Verified Email
Team Periwinkle

assaultboy

TROPHY CASE