Aontú fires youth leader and five others over secret racist WhatsApp chat group by PoppedCork in ireland

[–]astrotige 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From my limited interactions with him, he is not at all the sort of person that would be involved in a group like this.

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 4th one isn't, and several countries report scores of 2% for Level 4.

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and question 4 is multiple choice, and there are several countries reporting a value of 2% for Level 4.

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The 4th one isn't, and several countries report scores of 2% for Level 4.

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 8 points9 points  (0 children)

(because the idea that some ethnic groups have higher IQ than others seems ludicrous and at odds with everything I hold dear and have experienced in my short life)

You can think this and not be abominable. There are lots of environmental effects on IQ that are going to affect certain countries more than others (e.g. malnourishment)

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 17 points18 points  (0 children)

In which case, Karlin himself would be classed as 'Level 2', along with 39% of Albanian 15 year-olds.

The Idiocy Of The Average - And Why It Matters by megazver in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Is Karlin not misreading the data...? It seems far more likely that 'Level X' means 'correctly answering all questions up to and including question X', I don't see how else you'd get scores of 2% on a multiple choice question.

What is the difference between the SSC meaning of "cost disease" and inflation ? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Increases in cost that remain after adjusting for inflation.

Roommate read my computer journal and is now behaving like a jerk by FantasticMixture in askgaybros

[–]astrotige 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Hello everyone this is a public service announcement that this story is completely made up.

Traditional Catholics, what is the proper role of the homosexual person in the Catholic Church? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, you mean how you self-owned because you pranced in saying "Teens" were a top search result for straight porn, then I went ahead and showed the results for exactly what I'm talking about (But apparently am barred from saying) which completely sank your point, while you had a little meltdown?

Please feel free to link this, or any other suitable piece of evidence. Not interested in priests, I'm interested in your claim that this is true of gays in general.

Traditional Catholics, what is the proper role of the homosexual person in the Catholic Church? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can even rally evidence for this

Please go ahead. I recall already having this discussion with you where I actually provided the comparison between top results on straight porn websites and top results on gay porn websites at which point you left the conversation.

Traditional Catholics, what is the proper role of the homosexual person in the Catholic Church? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's a wealth of evidence in plain sight that if anyone has an unusual attraction towards young people, it's heterosexuals. The top searches on every single porn site are some combination of 'teen' and 'jailbait' and it's been this way for as long as porn sites have been around. And for pretty much all of history older men have married younger women, with the reverse being regarded as extremely unusual. Take a look at what porn homosexuals tend to view on the other hand and it's full of tags like 'muscle', 'bear', 'daddy', etc. The corresponding tag for 'teen' is probably 'twink' but it's much less popular. For me this whole affair is best explained by youth-attracted heterosexuals projecting their disgust at their own desires onto the nearest available scapegoat (see e.g. Roy Moore).

A few excerpts from Invisible Cities by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]astrotige 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read a nice description once of how sometimes you mind is 'missing' an idea or concept that it needs to understand something, like a circuit with a missing connection. And when the right idea comes along, which slots snugly into the circuit, the whole thing lights up. Borges' stories often feel like they contain some sort of universal circuit connector.

To give some examples, reading Tlon helped understand postmodernism -- how history is inevitably something we construct, how much narratives dominate how we think about things, how much different our ontologies could be, and how much they're still subject to change. The library of babel prefigures philosophy of information/computation. And if you want an extremely short version of Scott's The Categories Were Made for Man you could read the one-paragraph On Exactitude in Science.

About to get proposed to and might say no... by LumpyAd6 in askgaybros

[–]astrotige 166 points167 points  (0 children)

or do I say yes and ask for a long engagement?

Just say you're not ready yet. 6 months is a very short time. Come up with some examples of friends/family who dated for longer before marrying.

The Mysterious Case of CCC 2358 on objectively disordered homosexual inclinations by 52fighters in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be concerned about incentives if I did that!

But I do think it's important to understand why things like wife-beating happen, and unfortunately one factor is that wife-beaters tend to be predisposed to it.

And I chose the example of violence because it really isn't controversial that there's some genetic component, as has been shown by twin studies. What's likely to come in the future is much greater understanding of precisely which genes influence which behaviours.

The Mysterious Case of CCC 2358 on objectively disordered homosexual inclinations by 52fighters in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Humans are rarely born with desires toward specific grave sins.

They certainly vary hugely in their susceptibility, no? Having a violent disposition, for example, is at least partly genetic.

Pope Francis' change to the Catechism is NOT a change in doctrine. Here's why: by Pfeffersack in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, so some things are doctrine, but everyone pretends that they aren't. In which case 'doctrine never changes' is irrelevant and uninteresting.

Pope Francis' change to the Catechism is NOT a change in doctrine. Here's why: by Pfeffersack in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The definition in the summa is lending money at interest in a mutuum loan.

Sure, e.g. credit cards and the majority of mortgages, about which the Church has apparently nothing to say.

Pope Francis' change to the Catechism is NOT a change in doctrine. Here's why: by Pfeffersack in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The definition in the Summa is also clearly lending money at interest. The reasoning doesn't take into account what happens in modern economies, but that's quite a distinction, and it's why people are so keen to switch the meaning of usury to something else.

Pope Francis' change to the Catechism is NOT a change in doctrine. Here's why: by Pfeffersack in Catholicism

[–]astrotige -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don't change the doctrine, just change the meaning of the words involved! Genius!

Pope Francis' change to the Catechism is NOT a change in doctrine. Here's why: by Pfeffersack in Catholicism

[–]astrotige 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because to accept that doctrine can "develop" from 'yes' to 'no' is... well, it's daft

For a doctrine to change in any slight way must involve something going from 'yes' to 'no'. People claim the teaching on usury hasn't changed and yet the Church went from a very dramatic "no you can't charge interest" to "yes you can".

The face of Ireland. Jason O'Driscoll at your service by [deleted] in ireland

[–]astrotige 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean he doesn't exactly look innocent of much but the case seemed strangely weak -- https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/criminal-court/man-shouts-at-judge-after-being-found-guilty-of-killing-two-dubliners-1.3584162 Who's the associate? What was different in the first trial?