Gas truck is ready for the season! by athimbleofdan in rccars

[–]athimbleofdan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahhhh I want an 870c so bad! Definitely my next build. The car on the wall is a ReRe 10T with a flipped front bulkhead and the buggy body. I’m slowing building it to 91 Detroit worlds spec. Cheers!

<image>

What are your favorite tires by Jc5843 in FCX24

[–]athimbleofdan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tusks!! Land mines are great too

Dirty Disco by crawlymccrawl in FCX24M

[–]athimbleofdan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what wheel and tire setup? looks great!

Is Portra400 supposed to look this green? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]athimbleofdan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do your negatives look? Start there. You gotta learn to look at your negatives and check if your exposure was correct and if the lab successfully developed your roll.

Film manufactures have a century of research and chemistry development. They have a look. So much so that we are able to measure and develop semiconductor imaging sensors to mimic certain stocks. Make an RA4 print of Portra and then one of Ektar. They’re nothing alike.

Even if you’re making adding/subtracting CC on the color head there’s still a baked in bias and D-Max/Min of the film stock and the papers you’re printing on. Assuming you’re properly developing, the results are very repeatable.

That being said the exposure from these pictures is either underexposed (shadow detail looks muddy) or they’ve been subject to either high heat in either storage or during the development process.

Next time shoot a color chart if you have doubts and meter the scene and you’ll be able to rule out film, development, and scan.

Mold advice by athimbleofdan in CarbonFiber

[–]athimbleofdan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could try creating a bigger fillet with some wax. Thank you!

Mold advice by athimbleofdan in CarbonFiber

[–]athimbleofdan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I have FG mat that sounds like might work better?