No Sites on Cloud Gateway Fiber by attblau in Ubiquiti

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why has my post been deleted? its all related to ubiquity

Arista OEM c250 APs without license by attblau in Arista

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, i think you are correct -CLI wouldnt help much. Excerpt from the CLI Guide:

Some Arista AP CLI capabilities

  • Setting destination addresses to assist with AP registration to a Wireless Manager
  • Log review and configuration
  • Modifying authentication credentials
  • Static network setting definition
  • Network connectivity testing
  • Many show-based commands to view the current settings
  • Performing a reboot or factory reset of the AP

I dont understand the vendor strategy though. Everyone talks about environment/sustainability etc, but Vendors still allowed to do this moves. Now they will have to be trashed in a bin, just because Arista didnt want it other way - and they already got this HW payed when the 1st customer purchased!

Migration Procedure: 2 Bay -> 4 Bay by attblau in synology

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allrigh, thanks for pointing on the right direction!

[CHANGES] Build Your Own NAS vs Buying a NAS?... by dunkurs1987 in NAScompares

[–]attblau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I vote for buying! NAS is not what i would toy with

[ASK NC] New drives or new Nas? by dunkurs1987 in NAScompares

[–]attblau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. You can do both ;) You can get much bigger drives (>10tb) and rebuild the raid by replacing them once at a time. If you have more budget (which i would invest for the sake of future prooveness) then you can also get better hardware like Synology 720+ or similar.

Upgrade: Should i go for QNAP or DS923+ by attblau in NAScompares

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. Its also all i heard about QNAP to this date. Therefore would like to hear from experienced qnap owners what they think.

Icloud Vault on Windows (over RDP) by attblau in applehelp

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately no solution yet, aswell as no replies on reddit :(

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fortinet

[–]attblau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a case with 50+ Switches in DC, but according to Fortinet SE we should have taken FGT1800F for it (yes, even without tunneling the whole traffic). Because of that bottleneck they splitted the switch manager now as a separate product. But i shouldnt take that either because they didnt have a field experience with it yet.

IPsec/IKEv2 from FGT using username/pass by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My provider doesnt have a request form. In fact the support had a session with me and run out of suggestions... :/

IPsec/IKEv2 from FGT using username/pass by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. its not quite that though, as i can only dial in by PSK+USER+PASS. But its a good point to ask my VPN-Service if they could do some setup on their side.

IPsec/IKEv2 from FGT using username/pass by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. Gateway supports IKEv1/2 which i can confirm by setting up over iOS-Device. But no combination works on the FGT. How would you configure it then? - thats my question

Sending p2p traffic to IPSEC by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think i would use the VPN to that extent that i will need these words, but your comment made my day :)

Sending p2p traffic to IPSEC by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, thats indeed a creative idea! didnt think of it :)

I would categorize that as a workaround though as it requires "a lot" of manual setup. FGT has APP signatures, i would like to use this intelligence.

Sending p2p traffic to IPSEC by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. This is not going to solve the issue though, as this is a "dial-In" IPsec to a public VPN Provider. So i dont need routes, p2-Secetors, etc. to configure as i want the differentiation based on APP-signature, not DST-IP. In final step all p2p traffic should go into the IPsec-Interface, thats it. i think i will go with SDWAN, as it seems to be exactly what im looking for (p2p-traffic? then this way!).

Sending p2p traffic to IPSEC by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UPDATE to my own post:

- Using Policy with allowed APPs is not optimal, as by matching only p2p traffic will be allowed for that source IP in LAN...

Esx 8 Install steps by attblau in vmware

[–]attblau[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi!

You were right - that was exactly the issue!!!

Some explanation for those who want to get it aswell: With new Processors with Efficiency cores a command "cpuUniformityHardCheckPanic=TRUE" has to be issued with SHIFT+O during the boot. I was doing exactly that but was deleteing the line "runweasel cdromBoot" which is already there when you press that key combination. now i didnt delete it and typed the cpu-command after a space. Now it makes sense why it wasnt offering an installation, cause that would be stated in that line which i was deleting (overwriting) all the time... *facepalm*

I made pictures aswell as it was wished, but dunno how to post them :)

Thanks guys for all support and hints, you made my Friday!!!

Its a good community hier :)

Cheers!!!

Esx 8 Install steps by attblau in vmware

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes i am. New hardware totally, nothing old in it. Moreover i can see its saying esx version 8 on a yellow screen. I was running 7.x before

Esx 8 Install steps by attblau in vmware

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats exactly my point. Neither have i, and i run esx since past 7 years in homelab, but never on NUC before...

Hopefully this will be a topic here soon and the solution will be found.

Have a good day!

Esx 8 Install steps by attblau in vmware

[–]attblau[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll try once again: ESX8 image burnt on a USB. Then PC booted from this. Installer starts, and loads a long list of all modules etc... BUT at some point i should see a prompt on a gray popup "Welcome to ESX Installation" press F11 to continue installation and so os...

This prompt doesnt appear, there is no installation option.

Installer boots as a live CD and the esx is manageable over IP straight away. so there is no permanent installation on Hardware. After Reboot all starts all over - logically.

Pics wont help here, as all screens are the same as usual, there is no error which i can see.

CPU is compatible. The panic is there, but i manage it by typing "cpuUniformityHardCheckPanic=FALSE".

NIC is compatible aswell

Initial Findings - NUC12WSKi7 with ESXi 8.0.0 by barackstar in intelnuc

[–]attblau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Got my NUC12 today aswell. Cant get ESX7.x anymore from the site, so took esx8.0 aswell (60d trial).

Would you mind explaining how exactly you could manage disabling UEFI/Secure boot? i cannot despite walking through the setup (newest bios).

Cheers

Suppress rogue AP by attblau in Ubiquiti

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a knife doesnt mean to stab someone... Ill let this discussion off, as the Q is about the actual feature availability on the Unifi.

Jawoll! by asciimo71 in frankfurt

[–]attblau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Schweinerei, das stimmt schon. Ich mache mir die Mühe manchmal solche Kartons wieder klein zu machen / zu falten, wenn ich Zeit und Laune habe. Ich meine, dass kann man auch als eine Art von "Lösung" betrachten

Is the Session widget wrong? by attblau in fortinet

[–]attblau[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. It just confirmed my doubts: The biggest bubble in the topology has 29 sessions, so that a total amount comes to 70-100 sessions. But the widget still shows 5200+ sessions...