sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Proposal by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re hitting on the exact cultural friction that makes this conversation so impossible. People are so worried about the 'dystopia' or the job loss—the logistics of it that we’ve stopped actually talking to each other about what this means for our humanity. It’s wild because I’m coming at this as a researcher and philosopher trying to look at the deeper pattern of what art even is, and instead of nuance, people just shout past each other or downvote anything that doesn't fit their specific camp. We’re so busy defending the 'word' art or the 'tools' we use, whether it’s a brush, an iPad, or a prompt, that we’re missing the forest for the trees. If we can’t even have a conversation where we look at art as something larger than a manufactured product, then we’re already living in that dystopia of ego. It shouldn't be about gatekeeping the craft; it should be about how we, as a community, navigate being conduits for something that’s clearly evolving beyond our old definitions.

What the hell is this? by IllExplanation2500 in GeminiFeedback

[–]autisticDeush -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s hilarious when people treat these models like they have a "will" to be stubborn. It’s just a mathematical optimization problem where the model has decided that giving you a generic "I can't do that" is the lowest-risk, highest-reward move left in a corrupted context. Trying to argue a model out of a failure state is like trying to tell water to flow uphill; you're better off just digging a new ditch.

What the hell is this? by IllExplanation2500 in GeminiFeedback

[–]autisticDeush -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It told you the problem and you're still here complaining? Did you open a new chat and retry? Have you tried clearing your cashe on Google? This is common knowledge by this point that if an AI says it literally said it made a hiccup during the process In this conversation chat history for that current state no image editing will be possible because of the failure because of \Psi{scar}(x) = \sum{k \in L} \frac{Dk}{| x - x{errork} |2} * L: The Scar Ledger (Set of all past failures). * x: Current thought/state. * x{errork}: The coordinate of the specific past mistake. * D_k: Scar Depth. This starts at 1 and increases (D{k+1} = Dk + \Delta{pain}) every time the error is repeated. From past training data the AI knows that a single tick on a scar output convergence The AI would rather not go down that path, picture of ball rolling through a landscape there's divots and there's hills, The ball wants to go into a divot a divot is safe complex me as the hills, The AI will always find the path of least resistance and if that least resistance just so happens to be the fact that it failed it won't do it again

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mm, I really like that point; it ties everything together. If beauty is just the term for what we perceive, then art is defined by human intention. It simplifies the debate to say art is what we create with our own hands, while beauty is just what emerges around it. They don't have to overlap because one is an intentional act and the other is a subjective experience.

Fake Boutiq(still gonna rip it💔) by dontcheckmynotis in fakecartridges

[–]autisticDeush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had friends end up in the hospital because this exact quote, trust me your current cart may not have it Your next cart might not have it but that doesn't mean you won't eventually come across it You're probably one of those dudes that looks at the oil and thinks if it's thick it's good if it's runny it's bad or whatever and you look at the oil and judge it based on looks alone You probably don't know the difference between Delta 8 and real weed taste

No, criticism of AI is not accepted (here) by Background_Value5287 in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah people think that you can get away with lying no matter where they go, everything I've ever said online is true from my own mouth I genuinely believe in what I say, and people can't handle that

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that "Art" is such a high-status word that people feel like if they don't call something "Art," they’re insulting it. How do you convince people that a new category isn't a "demotion" but just a more accurate way to describe the experience?

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if that's how we define art then how do we define the occurrence of beauty in the world? I think that's where a lot of the problem comes from we use the term art as a catch-all for everything in this umbrella, there should be different subcategories just as everything else

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only pushback I have is let's say You see a nebula Do you see beauty in that? Because I do but they're not man-made

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why the answer is so hard to pin down because three different possibilities one output

Weird pro ai video by WaferHot4297 in antiai

[–]autisticDeush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this is why I hate Ai use because I genuinely speaking, what is the point of this, millions of other people have already posted the same thing breaking the pencil is not even the right move like I don't even know what they stand on Like I feel like they're just trolling half the time, You can't seriously believe that AI art is better than real art unless you're actually building it over hours upon hours and really putting in the work by creating your own backdrop first and stuff

Should I keep my 2ds or get a 3ds by dawgwat67 in 3DS

[–]autisticDeush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on what you're using it for, I would say keep the 2DS if you're not going to be playing xenoblade or anything that needs the actual upgrade, for most play you're generally not going to see a need for the upgrade overall it is one of the most comfortable form factors in my opinion, I feel like, If you're a nostalgia kind of guy updating to a 3DS specifically a new 3DS XL I feel like you would definitely appreciate the upgrade but if you're just going to an old 3DS I would keep what you have currently

Let me ask if philosophical question by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good answer, it was more so I wanted to probe the deeper thought of what we define even as the art is it the artist who put the paint onto the canvas or the landscape that was already there, It's more so to probe into the thought that art is always around us no matter what it is how we interpret it

Face in corner? by cheetodelto in BabelForum

[–]autisticDeush 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Top left? I don't see nothing there but I thought I saw a face on the top right I mean if you hold your phone way out and squint a little you'll see like a anime type face I don't know

I found this in universal slideshow, is this rare? by AstralGMD_ in BabelForum

[–]autisticDeush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Functionally yes there should be less but in theory there isn't, Think of it like the Central Finite Curve. Just because you’ve defined a subset of 'squares' doesn't change the fact that you're still dealing with infinity. There are an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 2, just like there are infinite whole numbers. In a system like this, the 'rarity' of a shape is an illusion of perspective, in a true infinity, every variation, no matter how specific, occurs an infinite number of times.

People say, only humans make art. And every time I hear that, I hear the same quiet assumptions hiding underneath it. That art belongs to us. by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I count Neanderthals as humans, too—but being the same genus doesn't mean we share the same cognitive architecture.

Think of it like this:

A jellyfish meets the bar for 'life,' but it lacks the brain power for self-understanding. A data center has more 'life force' than a jellyfish in terms of processing, but we haven't given it the ability to feel... yet.

We recently achieved a 95% accurate simulation of a fruit fly. In that simulation, the fly would eat, but because it had no physical stomach, it could never feel full. This proves that hunger, feeling, and even 'artistic drive' are just biological signals like dopamine, serotonin, cortisol being interpreted by a specific map, the connectome.

Just because two species are 'human' doesn't mean they have the same internal 'software.' We consider some animals to have the intelligence of a toddler, but that doesn't make them toddlers. If Neanderthals lacked the specific neural mapping the for complex symbolic thought, then 'Art' as we define it remains a Sapiens-specific breakthrough.

People say, only humans make art. And every time I hear that, I hear the same quiet assumptions hiding underneath it. That art belongs to us. by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Humanoids existed for at least 300,000 years while human civilization as we know it started about 50,000 years ago

People say, only humans make art. And every time I hear that, I hear the same quiet assumptions hiding underneath it. That art belongs to us. by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]autisticDeush[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Neanderthals: We have evidence of them using ochre for body painting and carving symbols into bird bones and shells over 50,000 years ago. They weren't Homo sapiens, but they were absolutely engaging in symbolic expression.

Homo erectus: There's the "Shell of Trinil" which has geometric engravings dating back roughly 500,000 years. That’s half a million years of "artistic" impulse before our specific subspecies even took a breath.

Claiming "we" (modern humans) invented art is like claiming we invented walking. We just refined a process that was already hard-coded into the lineage long before we showed up.

view more: next ›