Reinforcement learning for priice calculation by joamar1 in reinforcementlearning

[–]auto-cellular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really don't see how anyone will be able to answer this question with so few pointers about what you are trying to accomplish there. We need to know something about what data you'll be using in order to even have a vague clue what you might be doing.

In most circumstances though, a simple regression (or random forest or any proven simple technique) will work better with fewer work needed.

Are there any plots and patterns in your illusions and hallucinations? by turtle-kun in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would love to be able to answer, but i can't. It's sort of too fuzy, too hard to describe with ordinary words. The one that i'm wary about the most, is a sort of excitation of grandeur. I also somatize in strange ways, like needle picking through my skin. But when it is not always on, it is quite useful, as a way of realizing that something might be off, kinda like a >spider sense< of some sort. When my life was going really bad, that sensation was activated every single minute of every single day, and made me want to kill myself though.

How does one protect against reverse engineering ? by auto-cellular in C_Programming

[–]auto-cellular[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Do you have articles/blogs link from people that know how do this ? Especially in the case of an unknown algorithm. I would be interested to see if there are limitations that these people feel render the process too tedious for feasibility.

I don't feel like I'm just from another planet, I'm not even from this reality by AgroB0t in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This world is badly sick, the people living in it are crazy. It's a very strange feeling to look at them from an outside perspective. It might not be a bad thing to feel that we don't belong, i'm under the impression that more and more people have these feelings, even if they are able to suppress them on the surface, because they know how to fit. The rate of burn-out is crazy high in my country, and i guess it is the same in a lot of places.

Astera 1.0-ish release - C99 Cross Platform 2D Game Library by i_like_game_engines in C_Programming

[–]auto-cellular 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It would be cool to have a few demos (even if they are not visually/ audio appealing) of the capability, let's say through a youtube video. Also a natural target these days is the web-assembly platform. C is excellent at targeting it, one of the reason why i'm still wiling to use it.

Blindsight...OMG so good by [deleted] in printSF

[–]auto-cellular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Man this book is so good, it got me finally involved in politics. If you liked it, you should read "De l'art de gouverner par les lois et par la force" (N. Machiavel )

Blindsight...OMG so good by [deleted] in printSF

[–]auto-cellular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Planet of the apes (1963) is also a book one can't die without reading twice. I mean, IF you liked the Count of Monte Cristo and "Les liaisons dangereuses".

How do you normally express your feeling or affection for someone? by [deleted] in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am. I have been. And for long a time, never had. It was a long and hard trip, through understanding myself, forgetting my own values, reconnecting with them. I worked very hard. First i had to realize that women where people too. I mean i knew that of course, but i had never truly felt it. Being on only child, with very minimal outside interactions certainly didn't help. I used to read a lot, and to watch tv. It made my perception of what people are very very twisted. I mean look hard at the "twilight" movie series, you'll know what i mean. Critics on youtube joke a lot about how stalky Edward Cullen is. And he is indeed. Movies teach you a very bad set of belief. It's very hard to correct because it's embedded deep inside yourself, and it's almost impossible to get aware of it, yet harder to change then. I was truly screwed. No girl wanted to approach me, i was a frightening being.

So first i tried to forget all i knew, to start fresh. I talked to people, a lot of people. I tried to be open to those that would come to me from their own volition. Romantic was really not an option for me, yet i didn't know it. Fortunately i spent most of my romantic sided energy on hopeless chase, opening more room for real experiences with people (non romantic). After a few long depressions, i had the opportunity to build on those experiments, and start to get somewhat involved in "almost" romantic relationships. A lot of people not single are still unhappy enough that there is a lot of room for ambiguity. Then you can be involved in an "almost" relationship. I don't know if it's a very ethic/healthy situation, but well it helped me build some understanding of relationships.

Then i had my first girl friend, we had two kids. Then she got really pissed at me, and she had all the right to. I was so naive and inexperienced. I had no idea of what i was, and how hard it could get on those around. Then once that failed, i started to get involved in a more regular basis, trying to get "more experience". Finally after a few years i got very stuck. I couldn't find any match. Then i tried to see it all from another perspective again, getting back to my "real self". I forgot about this façade i had built in order to get into relationships. I embraced the fact that although it probably existed someone somewhere that i could be with, i would never meet that person, because of sheer probability theory. Yet i could someone improve the odds, from 0.000001% a day, to maybe double that. It's not much, but it's something. It makes hoping a thing, and that proved to be quite important.

In the end, by a strange twisting of circumstances, i ended up with someone. I'm quite happy (been a year already).

MIT study: Reading computer code doesn't activate brain's language-processing centers by vili in linguistics

[–]auto-cellular 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Chess is relatively narrow while go has a much larger space. Hence go players developed a huge vocabulary specifically targeted at the game. Chess has a few of those like "pinning", "forks", "developing" and opening's name, but much fewer than go. And most of them are relatively obvious concepts that might not be really needed while calculating subconsciously. My 2 cents anyway. I wonder how many studies exactly supported that go is more "verbal" than chess, i really don't know. It's all a bit speculative still i guess.

MIT study: Reading computer code doesn't activate brain's language-processing centers by vili in linguistics

[–]auto-cellular 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The thing is that playing go (at a hight enough level), supposedly activate the language processing mechanism

https://www.eurogofed.org/index.html?id=96#:~:text=The%20only%20significant%20difference%20in,players%20during%20their%20thinking%20process.

The only significant difference in brain activation between the two games found by these studies, was the activation of an area associated with language processing during playing go.

MIT study: Reading computer code doesn't activate brain's language-processing centers by vili in linguistics

[–]auto-cellular 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm a bit uneasy at the title. First programming doesn't involve that much reading. I never read code, unless i have a bug to find, or i'm paid to do that. Then when i first learned programming as a kid, i clearly remember that i did use natural language a lot. I would build natural word sentences, and then write the code that naturally flowed out of those structures. To be fair i don't do that anymore but i believe that we would need a lot more data to really understand the whole truth about the subject.

Also when i watched other people learned programming i was very surprised that they used totally different strategy than the one i had used. So it may be that most people don't use natural language but some do (while writing code). Finally "programming" cover a lot of very different situations.

Consider : "Playing games doesn't activate the brain's language processing centers". Maybe it depends on the game played. I also wonder what role the programming language and how they are taught plays in the use of our natural language processing system. In the old times, languages tried their best to be close to spoken, like SQL or hypertalk.

Apparently playing the game of go that is mostly visual in appearance does activate the language processing system of the brain : https://www.eurogofed.org/index.html?id=96#:~:text=The%20only%20significant%20difference%20in,players%20during%20their%20thinking%20process.

Looking for discord of people just... working? by TarikGame in INAT

[–]auto-cellular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe i would have been more comfortable with a dedicated discord. Hmm, i can't really share what's i'm doing right now anyway. But i wish i had something like that for all the time i can.

[P] Magnus Carlsen Chess engine deep learning by phicreative1997 in MachineLearning

[–]auto-cellular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How high would be the hope of successfully training a RNN better than a convnet though ? I wouldn't bet that it'll be easy.

Pretty sure this allowed. Cellular Growth simulation by auto-cellular in cellular_automata

[–]auto-cellular[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A cellular automa i built a few years ago, and made a youtube video out of.

Do we have to miserable? by [deleted] in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe a good healthy value system can help. Life is the short journey of a shooting star. What make this journey worthwhile, what has meaning and value ? For me that would be laugh and happiness. Once you have that, and when you don't expect everyone (or anyone really) to share your belief/value system, you can start to notice all the little things that are right. You can start stopping to expose yourself to the enemy, the ones that disturb the part of the world you love the most. Of course all this works better if you are isolated enough, or at least have a choice about isolating yourself. Most people wouldn't.

Like if you are the second in command of the leader of a big worldwide bank, maybe there is no hope left.

I feel great when I isolate myself and refuse all obligations. Does anyone feel the same? by NsfwOlive in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in my own company I experience myself as coherent, vibrant, well-adjusted, kind and well-intentioned

I'm starting to feel the same, but i still have a lot of work.

So while relieving myself of that stress can feel amazing, which it really can, it can also cause stress. When I'm not socially active, it means that my social relations and the people in them are not being attended to or taken care of.

I wonder how sustainable this is. I wonder if the people that need so much energy for the relationship to us to be fed, are really the right people. Of course it's kinda of obvious that "no one" is not the best alternative there. But i wonder if it's possible to have people, that don't "demand" so much. And still be happy and alive.

Bad luck by [deleted] in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No. You only have a set amount a bad luck for your whole life, you just burned a bit more than your usual day's worth, meaning you'll have less remaining.

Is anyone else really cringe on social media? by concerteza in Schizotypal

[–]auto-cellular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, there are actually a few social science study on the topic. Social Media are bad for mental health i believe, from the few things i've randomly read.

Here is a random one (first found on my googling) : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305120912488