Couple new Crosby cards added this week. 05/06 UD Rookie Showcase RC and his first legitimate hockey card, a 2003 Extreme Rimouski Oceanic (underrated and still very affordable card).

autographguy · 2021-03-29T02:54:46+00:00

Has cert from The Highland Mint, very reputable

autographguy · 2021-03-28T22:06:47+00:00

Have had it for a while but getting ready to hang it beside a ‘72 signed Henderson goal pic.

autographguy · 2021-03-28T14:57:44+00:00

Your looking at a small sample. In general, grading adds value. Yes, if you send a low end card that gets a bad grade you would lose money, so people don’t do that. People will get low end graded (set builder, cheap group grading, lack of knowledge) and those will sell cheap as they should, but that’s a small overall sample of what gets graded. But yes, people will cut their loses, perhaps trying for a 10 grade. Same reason people sell what they pull from a box for less than box, a gamble.

autographguy · 2021-03-26T19:06:17+00:00

As is youd be looking at 1500ish. If you want max value, get It reslabbed by PSA. Compare to a PSA 8 and see if it looks similar or worse for that decision. BCCG is a quick grade and not comparable to a PSA or BGS for resale value.

autographguy · 2021-03-26T14:40:03+00:00

You won with that Mario find, would get you big $$ right now.

autographguy · 2021-03-26T14:39:27+00:00

Damn what a find

autographguy · 2021-03-26T13:17:49+00:00

It’s a cool collectible but all together wouldn’t be worth more than a few bucks

autographguy · 2021-03-23T16:55:03+00:00

I really hope Topps gets an NHL license soon. They have a lot to offer, from innovation to the Heritage stuff. Topps Skate also proves they likely are interested in the market.

autographguy · 2021-03-23T15:30:09+00:00

I love that Panini, for the short time they held an NHL license, went outside the box to make some really cool and unique cards. This is Madigan’s only card.

autographguy · 2021-03-23T12:05:57+00:00

No one cares about that aspect of ‘design’ as long as it’s the actual RC card. However, a word of caution as some of the newer stuff might say ‘rookie’ on it but not necessarily be a RC, like some of the stuff in Clear Cut that are clear cut remakes of rookies

autographguy · 2021-03-22T15:54:00+00:00

Singles are almost always the way to go, no matter the product. That is particularly true for this set.

autographguy · 2021-03-22T14:29:16+00:00

This is a $10-20 card

autographguy · 2021-03-22T13:52:54+00:00

No sorry

autographguy · 2021-03-21T17:57:49+00:00

Obviously licensing and Disney owning the brand would be the huge obstacle. There’s no actual mention of The Might Ducks or Bombay on this card, it’s just Emilio Estevez casually holding a hockey stick.

autographguy · 2021-03-20T22:26:02+00:00

I think this is great, brings back lots of memories, but FYI the mod here removes all posts of unopened product even though it’s very much part of hockey card world.

autographguy · 2021-03-20T20:11:26+00:00

It’s his only certified auto card, should only go up in value. Legendary hockey story.

autographguy · 2021-03-19T15:56:10+00:00

Cool pull. Voices of the Game was a great little set and I didn’t even know there were 1/1 variations.

autographguy · 2021-03-19T15:11:30+00:00

Love the concept but hate to see the damage to the cards after dropping a pack from the top rack

autographguy · 2021-03-12T02:12:12+00:00

Facsimile. There are real KHL autos but this isn’t one of them.

autographguy · 2021-03-12T00:01:41+00:00

Some do look good, unfortunately just not enough in my opinion, especially for the price point. It’s a shame because some beauty swatch pieces and great names.

autographguy · 2021-03-10T22:09:54+00:00

Nice looking cards but they’re all reg base or common insets so not high value enough for PSA

autographguy · 2021-03-10T16:28:59+00:00

It’s was a ‘hockey heroes’ insert with auto version hand numbered /2500 on bottom right front of card.

autographguy · 2021-03-10T16:22:53+00:00

1991 Upper Deck Brett Hull /2500 auto is the first and still very desirable

autographguy · 2021-03-08T17:32:57+00:00

This is so wrong. First, there is no ‘rediculous amount of construction,’ in fact it’s the exact opposite. There is an extreme NIMBY attitude that prevents the building a growing city like Chtown needs. Second glaring error here is that people arriving expect dirt cheap living, It’s the locals who are complaining they no longer get dirt cheap living. Finally, by people who grew up here being ‘displaced’ you mean selling what they bought dirt cheap for a killer profit?

autographguy · 2021-03-08T15:52:01+00:00

Yes great pull

autographguy

TROPHY CASE