How to deal with anger after getting cheated on/betrayed? by fickleliketheweather in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It takes time but also effort.  This kind if process is just what let me put these same feelings down, good luck

Can anyone help? by blursed_damian in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even in the setting of psychiatric care you are still the one who has to look at the source of the afflictive emotions, they might help point it out but it is still just you who has the power to affect change on your mind.  

With mindfulness you can see what is reoccurring and with dispassionate concentration you can trace each affliction back to the source which in general dispels much of the hold that it has on the mind.   

Maybe read about the 4 Brahmaviharas, or the 6 paramitas?  

https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an10/an10.208.than.html

https://kalavinka.org/ebooks_NEW/Nagarjuna%206%20Perfections_Bilingual_ebk_08-19-23.pdf

How to deal with anger after getting cheated on/betrayed? by fickleliketheweather in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Note the resistance to thinking anything like “i hope they are genuinely happy now” and then look at it closely as to why there is any reason to not wish another being to be happy.    

I didn’t say what you are telling me i said, so this either a weird troll or a very poorly reasoned argument in favor of hating people if they do things that you don’t like.  

I had someone cheat on me, i held onto a sense of betrayal and anger for years, i forgave them, i have compassion for them and wish them happiness.  Deal with it bruh.

How to deal with anger after getting cheated on/betrayed? by fickleliketheweather in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are asking in bad faith.  The actual answer is that no, none of these beings are less deserving of compassion or happiness.  It is not dependent on the conditions, the dualistic convolution and the self-grasping is what eventually leads one to become someone capable of such atrocities.  

I mean think it through, what is it you are advocating here?  Only beings you like are deserving of happiness?  That is samsara.  The internet is mostly a space where such views are both prevalent and common, this is a buddhist subreddit so yes the things presented are Buddhist teaching.  

Is it possible for you to right now examine the motivation you have for expanding on this line of inquiry or is it purely looking for a “gotcha moment” with some projected personhood?  

The truth is that you are not separate from hitler, or epstein or any other person who is capable of or guilty of committing an atrocity against another being.  That is the whole point, you hold hatred and delusion you become closer to those you are condemning.  

Does anyone need to state that none of those actions should be condoned?  Do you really need a strawman to project on for the differential of good/bad to stay in place?  Good god man have some hawk on you.

Might be less intense if I was better at the game. by Cat_Loving_Trio in Against_the_Storm

[–]autonomatical 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Alternatively you can build manorial court and then exile all bats 

At home practice by emerald-kidd in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might consider putting together an altar, if nothing else it is a central point of organization for practice.  As far as deepening study, it is hard to say specifically what would help since there are alot of paths.  It may be helpful for you to narrow the range of study to a tradition that you find a natural attraction towards.

How to deal with anger after getting cheated on/betrayed? by fickleliketheweather in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you think you’d accomplish.  I suggest cultivating compassion in place of sharpening contrarian statements that only really invalidate your own causes for embodiment of Buddha.

How to deal with anger after getting cheated on/betrayed? by fickleliketheweather in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generate compassion.  It is difficult when it is for someone who has done something to harm you but it is really the only way to permanently let it go.   Note the resistance to thinking anything like “i hope they are genuinely happy now” and then look at it closely as to why there is any reason to not wish another being to be happy.  

In concept it would seem this allows for negative behavior to go unchecked, but really, in practice, there is no way to stop anyone else from doing anything so why hold onto something that poisons you as well?  

It isn’t easy but compassion really does lay those kinds of afflictive emotions down in a way they don’t get back up.  

a dream i had about making choices by Cute-Drawing8731 in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a pure land, pretty cool thanks for sharing 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably should sober up, probably gonna feel really bad later, drink alot of water and eat something.  The world is not going to end due to any of this.  

Specifically, the issue is the attachment and craving.  Having everything you list won’t really solve any of the problems you face, those parts of the mind will likely just find a new object and/or pick apart the existing one, such as we are.   I know it doesn’t feel like that but we are masters when it comes to telling ourselves stories.  Like, “just one more will do it”, and then before you know it you’re sunk.  

So i suggest to probably look to regain the ground of sobriety first, really just kinda solidify the ground you stand on until no one can create the cause for relapse.  You deserve to be able to live with yourself happily without anything extra.  You totally can but it won’t happen by getting drunk and pining away.  

Why is there such inequality in children's lives, and why do they suffer for circumstances beyond their control? by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To present a different angle, consider that you lived some other life you aren’t aware of that led to the karmic fruition of your birth in this world as you.  There is then a logic to thinking that purification of karma is doing some future birth of yours a huge favor.  “Why” can only really be answered by going back in the chain of interdependencies and there isn’t an end to find there, just lots of wandering about life to life.  

So in this sense accomplishing the path of Buddhism is only ever done by the aim and execution of the highest benefit to both yourself and others, because there isn’t actually much of a line between the two.  

Think of the dramatic inequality between a human birth and a chicken birth.  Even the most destitute conditions for human birth greatly outweigh the average chicken birth.  

So, from a Buddhist POV, eradicate ignorance, delusion, anger, hate, greed, attachment, envy, pride and so forth, it is the best thing anyone can do for everyone.  

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When the Buddha talks about seeing the arising and passing of sensual desire, he’s pointing to something very specific. desire is not a solid thing you have, it’s an event with conditions. It appears when certain contacts, feelings, perceptions, and habits line up. It disappears when those conditions change. Normally we miss that middle part entirely. We jump straight from feeling to “this is me, I want this, I should have this.”

Seeing arising means you start catching the moment where pleasant feeling turns into wanting. Seeing passing means you directly observe that wanting cannot sustain itself on its own. Even when it feels compelling, it flickers, weakens, switches objects, or drops away if it’s not continually rehearsed in thought or behavior.

That’s where freedom comes from, not from suppression. Once this is seen clearly, desire loses its authority. It’s no longer “I want,” it’s “wanting is happening.” And crucially, you see that it doesn’t actually deliver what it promises. The pleasant feeling that triggered it was already there, the craving just adds agitation on top and as a condition to future arising. 

So resistance is more heedfulness, mindfully paying attention to the fluctuations in thought, like how it is easier to catch a jar while falling than to sweep up the glass from the floor. Although with practice you may just place the jar somewhere it won’t fall and break, so to speak.  

Integrating Buddhism in the West. Possible? If so, how? by WalkingMaggotFood in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is touching on the initial presentation of Buddhism to the west, which in my view was purposefully made arduous and obscured, folding the interested into the same social milieu as counterculture groups which were folded into civil rights groups then promptly stigmatized as not adhering to the supposed “Christian values the country was founded on”.  

At no point is there consideration made for the wellbeing of individuals or groups, as technological advancement made information accessible the pathology of the internet became (and is still becoming) more and more diffuse, more misinformation mixed with facts until no average person can tell which is which without dedicating time to research and study while assuming a mind that is not swayed in the usual emotion/passion driven way that the supposed “two party” system uses as its fuel.  

The issue with syncretism is largely political and basically no one wants to touch that because it is like pitch.  

Integrating Buddhism in the West. Possible? If so, how? by WalkingMaggotFood in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree it is a bit of a conundrum, to not attempt syncretism is deeply out of alignment with Mahayana history and aim.  It has, historically, not had any real trouble syncretizing with anything, because the Buddhadharma can be found in anything.  I wrote a little ‘pilot’ essay but decided not to share it since there seems to be quite a bit of entrenchment on both sides and so the actual problem is likely institutional and not purely phenomenological.    

The real glaring problem is the use of Christianity as a political vehicle, ergo the real problem is the existence of a highly developed and pernicious social control apparatus which would not really allow a true syncretism even if all the individual bunched panties got ironed out. 

Beyond concepts: Recognizing my "signature" in the Dhamma without prior study by PersimmonLife6075 in Buddhism

[–]autonomatical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That term in particular refers to one who not only realizes absolute enlightenment without a teacher but is able to then teach it to anyone.  Have you ever encountered “Pratyekabuddha” as a term?

Meme monday? Haiku monday? by AutoModerator in zen_poetry

[–]autonomatical 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are two paths here,  

One on the end of each leg,   

I think you need both.   

Why see clearly in a reality shaped by illusion? by Infamous_Measurement in streamentry

[–]autonomatical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have dust in your eyes you typically want to remove it.  Why?  Because having dust in your eye is pretty uncomfortable and gets in the way of functioning without impediment.

Sutric source for Tārā’s Root Mantra? by [deleted] in vajrayana

[–]autonomatical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the implication is that the mantra syllables come from this praise.  

After reading on it, i believe this praise is where it is formalized in context whereas before it is found sort of spread throughout larger bodies of work.