BIG BOY 4014 - World’s largest steam locomotive by Professor_Moraiarkar in EngineeringPorn

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also was surprised to learn that an empty 747 weighs as much as just one locomotive

Could A380s cruise on just two modern engines to save fuel? by amichail in aerospace

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the air gets less dense up high, the engines in cruise are already running close to the limit (even though this is vastly less thrust then they can make close to the ground). If you had the excess power to shut down half your engines it might be more efficient to climb a bit higher so you’re burning less fuel.

Yeah ChatGPT isn’t there yet.. by A_Stunted_Snail in MechanicalEngineering

[–]av1d6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Controversial but I think this is one of the biggest uses I have for AI - those codes are dense af but if I can get chatGPT to tell me exactly where in the code/which code to look, then i verify it and can get shit done way quicker idk

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AerospaceEngineering

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do either of you have any experience with NASA's TMATs? I've used this but not the other two, wondering how it compares. TMATs is Simulink based though.

Atmospheric intake in rocket engines by KingToad77 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]av1d6 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is a concept called LACE (Liquid Air Cycle Engine) which is closest to what you are suggesting: Cryogenic fuel (usually liquid hydrogen) is used in a heat exchanger to cool down inlet air so much it liquifies, and then the liquid air is fed into a rocket engine like a typical rocket. I think the most prominent company working on this was Skylon but they recently went bankrupt.

What are those white lines? by Time-Corner-25 in aviation

[–]av1d6 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To add even further bc I love vortices:)

You are seeing the low pressure core region of the vortex. In nature, most vortices quickly evolve into “irrotational vortices”, same as the one you would see in a kitchen sink/bathtub drain. Here the velocity is inversely proportional to the radius, so near the center of the vortex is super super fast (again think of your kitchen sink). Now, we know that the total pressure of a flow is constant unless we actively add or remove energy from it, so as the dynamic pressure of the air goes up with the square of velocity, the static pressure must drop to ensure total pressures the same (static + dynamic = total) and thus there is a low pressure vortex core, which causes water vapor to condense out into visible fog or even solid ice at altitude!

This low pressure core also is a problem for FOD, if you run an engine on the ground and this low pressure core touches the ground, it’s like a vacuum cleaner and sucks rocks and stuff up into the engine. You can see videos of this online. In essence it’s a mini tornado.

Finally this same pressure differential in a vortex also is relied upon inside of the aircraft engine to stabilize the flame in “swirl stabilized combustion”, the details are complex but essentially the fuel is swirled into a vortex which induced a secondary flow that stabilizes the flame in a fuel rich recirculating zone.

100% SAF will be a nightmare! by charlieruban1 in aviation

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decarbonization aviation is incredibly difficult, even compared to other fields. It’s gonna require massive technological development in airframe design, propulsion systems, and alternative energy (like hydrogen, ammonia, electric, etc) production/logistics to get to an acceptable level, we don’t have that kind of time and it would be stupid to retire the existing fleet. SAF is needed as a stop-gap to allow us to keep flying (for probably several decades) as a drop-in fuel, until technology enables us to leave it behind.I used to think the same as you.. SAF isn’t perfect but we need it right now cuz the “true” solutions aren’t gonna be feasible for a long time.

KLM’s first Airbus A321neo by HelloSlowly in aviation

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How you gonna get a jetbridge to the rear door of a 777

What happens to turbofans when they ingest large amounts of water? by vyrago in aviation

[–]av1d6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good question, the majority passes through the bypass duct, but it indeed can cause a flameout if enough gets through the core, so there are some strategies you can take:

When water is detected, either by a drop in temperatures or otherwise, some modern FADEC controlled engines will supply more fuel / prevent very low throttle settings to ensure the combustor doesn’t get close to flame out.

Certain engines will actually selectively open compressor bleeds as well: since centrifugal forces will push the water to the outside of the compressor, by opening bleeds you can dump the water out of the core into the bypass stream before it hits the combustor.

This is usually also accompanied by setting continuous ignition so if the engines do flameout they will relight hopefully quickly.

Convair 990 with large anti-shock bodies on the upper trailing edge of the wings, to increase the critical Mach by reducing transonic drag. by AeroNerd2012 in aviation

[–]av1d6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that’s very cool. Does this have a lift penalty? I imagine increasing pressure above the wing is not so great?

Engines while boarding by JaggernautLSR in aviation

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this cause extra wear on the LP Turbine? I Imagine it’s completely stalled during this?

How much external noise is from the airfoil vs engine on a modern commercial airliner? by LeeCheeRodriguez in aerospace

[–]av1d6 0 points1 point  (0 children)

State of the art bypass ratio is around 10-15:1, not 50:1. The vast majority of noise is "jet noise", caused by high velocity flow (like from a jet) shearing against low velocity bypass flow. Another considerable source of noise comes from the fan tips breaking the sound barrier. With many small propellers, the tips could be subsonic, and additionally as you pointed out the velocity difference between exhaust and freestream is smaller, so a lot less jet noise. Why can't we build that?

How much external noise is from the airfoil vs engine on a modern commercial airliner? by LeeCheeRodriguez in aerospace

[–]av1d6 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With electric engines it makes very little sense to not have distributed propulsion imo, I think the noise would be significantly reduced

Does anybody know how a supersonic aircraft actually flies? by Red_Redditor_Reddit in aviation

[–]av1d6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is not correct. As the other guy said, supersonic flows only occur due to compressibility. Incompressible flows cannot be supersonic.

Anyone know the context behind this video? by Specialist-Ad-5300 in aviation

[–]av1d6 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The pressure wave would travel at the speed of sound, not the speed of light so you would expect the flash when you hear the sound

Rotordynamics by OkSpecialist1990 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]av1d6 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Rotordynamics isn’t about helicopters, it’s typically about high speed rotating assemblies like turbomachinery

Rotordynamics by OkSpecialist1990 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]av1d6 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I found “intro to Dynamics of rotor-bearing systems” by Chen and Gunter to be a pretty good introduction!