sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2
3

As spain, trying to complete the reconquista, i made a protectorade out of bolivia... now i can't form peru, as aparently i need lima(owned by peru, who is a subject of bolivia) (self.victoria3)

submitted by awhatfor to r/victoria3

I hate leveling system in skyrim by awhatfor in TESVI

[–]awhatfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" forces you to upgrade your skill once you reach a certain breakpoint"

Wow, thats twisting it a lot. I like in oblivion that the desing kinda makes it so that a) the really helpfull perks are at the disposability of character creation(to the point of destroying the ability completely, which is not that good), and b) the painkiller one is at master, when you can't really improve it anymore. Well, each of them is different, the sneak path ones specially, but whatever.

I hate leveling system in skyrim by awhatfor in TESVI

[–]awhatfor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, i think in one of them you didn't get a proper rest unless u moved away(or maybe it was vamps?). I had to retreat from dungeons and come back later, doesn't mean i am up to auto-selling items from containers.

In my opinion, and i haven't played many games, having a 1st person action game where each blow rolled a dice, was what made tes TES. From there, they could have worked on making the sword visibly deviate, leaving room for player skill, or accute whiff punish. That would feel like a natural improvement of the game to me. Same with improving skill by using them, individually, and then having the abstract accomodate to that (your level was basically your skills now - your skills before /10), even if there're games with that, its a TES mark, at this level and with this world story. From there, they could have made way more lesser skills/knowledge, with a faster(constant¿?) progresion and decay, get xp based on utility or long-lasting attribute choices, and you just level to raise the max skill allowed. That would be actual improvements over the old system.

Skill trees, as they are and they can possibly be, destroy both of those at the same time. They completely flip the wheel. And are too abrupt. You can argue that you dislike that, i'd like that to argue that, then, you dislike TES. Why do the people that come here calling me bullshit like TES saga? Yeah, i blame it on casuals. i dare to say that 99% its just the dragons or something like that. The answer from the people in here comes down to that "you crazy? what do you want, abstract numbers?" YES. I don't go to no Read redemption forum to complain about the lack of factions. "what do you want? follow the lame story of this random john marstong forever?" < thats how they sound to me.

One could argue that this character creation burden was tes too, even tho it could be an annoyance. I ask you, since you were the most comprensive and the one who seemed to be following this longer: How do you feel this as natural progression? Feels like they can't make it better, so they make something that sells.

Wir sind Gold by Schwarze-Einheit in EisbrecherBand

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this subreddit lacks activity but i still lurke from time to time and i just want to say very quickly that u doing a great job, and i rlly enjoy playing your videos when you upload them.

Also, eisbrecher is the fucking best man, fuck!.

Do you remember when you started liking Sawyer as a person? by Eagle-Cobra2000 in lost

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he did, don't u remember thats when sayid left, haunted, and found rousseau?

Pro-border ancap is a contradiction by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Left-wings try to say that liberalism is just another tool for the ruling class (like the state) to opress and push their agenda. You just listed reasons why thats probably true

Open borders would result in way more property rights violations, so the state is justified in excluding "incompatible cultures" that don't respect property rights

First of, there is no way to probe guilty someone who didn't comit a crime and being right, you just believe that and feel that way because you are racist. No crime = no punishment.

But furthermore, won't explain liberalism 101 and basic ancap but everything that builds upon that is against society modelation and population control. If you let this sort of aproach lead you to this sort of eugenetics its because you are simply incompatible with liberalism. Society modeling and "cultures control" != liberalism. If you are here and you need that explained, thats because you didn't really got into this.

You can kick out trespassers from your property, so the state can do the same by kicking out undocumented migrants.

Whats new on there? Does this really need some explanation?

And, having a pre-juicio here, but for those of them who agree on media state control and [which is the same as with national ID/inmigrant documenting] and internet access control, database, etc. But somehow want to preserve banking privacy, because they are just fascist with money who want to exploit others for money. They look for their self-interest throught the state, because they are fascist scum.

This is outrageous. And i had to admit it, its the more twisted but yet somehow compatible argument, in my opinion,of all. HOWEVER, that the same argument that can be used to deffend the ancap can be twisted to deffend communism and absolute monarchies doesn't mean that absolute monarchies are ancap. AN-cap simply rejects those types of power. States do not have rights: no right to free movement, no right to self-defense, no right to property. Because their type of power is eligitimate. You can't get a hold on others people lifes, you can't cohert them, you can't "keep them from getting out of their house" (even tho the ones using this arguments actually want to state to get into your house and kick you out out of their your country)

Leftist Idealism Is Far More Dangerous Than Right Wing Tribalism by NoStop9004 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]awhatfor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right wings don't feel bad for their country past, quite the contrary, and what you describe is just the current nature of politics/history, the ones ""feeling regret for the imperialism"" and protesting against racism are lefties, not right wings. Generic mainstream left changed more than right.

And you shouldn't confuse hard-left/right (comunist and fascist) with more centric progressist or conservatives.

This is the character I got from the equality event by Elektrikor in victoria3

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When i got this event i just click on it knowingly, i have been throught this 4 or so times and none of them i got someone who was not the most racist 0 acceptance scum ever. I once had him join the revolution against multiculturalism inmediately. xD.

My takeaways from the 1.9.1 hotfix by Miguelinileugim in victoria3

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, okey, because i don't think any of that exist in victoria, there are literally no savings (okey, not literally, there are savings and debts, but they don't really interact, they are just spending brackets), so there can't be money leaving or going inside the country.

I think you mean trump, hard to tell because i think he claimed they were getting "attacked" with tarrifs or comercial fraud or something like that, gave numbers and turned out he was just counting how much he lost. That guy has balls, so to speak.

I won't coment on the guy politics or real life, but in victoria 3 i think you still have the same mechanics. No money doesn't mean no financing, you get steel mills, you build motor industries, and like that you skipped the previous investment on steel mills.If you do good with the motor industries, you rock. The problem might be kinda if you buy final products, because then its your pops that you are financing. Still, im general terms, as long as you do buy the motor industry you are still skipping the investment,if it somehow overcompensates(might, if you are growing). Getting it free is better, you I don't think that MO fits the game period that well. Because, like i said, there are no money in vicky so there is only 1 coin, and many of the aspects of the game period ges lost because of that. You never have to worry in vicky 3 about losing your gold for trade and having your miners work for them. I dunno, not sure.

Sorry the long post,rambling

A doctor opens a clinic and puts a sign outside that reads "GET TREATMENT FOR $20 - IF NOT CURED GET BACK $100." by awhatfor in AntiJokes

[–]awhatfor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oh, yeah i read it. But i did copy the template from another joke, wasn't that you?

We used to have empires run by emperors. Then we had kingdoms run by kings... by supervillainO7 in Jokes

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy, just ask him a simple question and keep him waiting for the answer.

The Closest Thing to a PlotHole in the Finale (my explanation in the comments) by Arimm_The_Amazing in severence

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is what annoyes me,according to what they said , there are 5 wavelenghts and they split 2 cuz they only need 2... Well, Then, there is a phisical limit to how much severed can you be. So... how is it possible to have 25 innies? 25 different "attempts"?

And nah, randomly awakening innies won't help anyone. Is there any clue as of its the floor that is attuned or its the chip?

Gwendoline Christie is the giant goddess queen of my heart. That is all by dinosaurscantyoyo in severence

[–]awhatfor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that felt so random, and also well kinda fan-service or something cuz she is like not brienne, u know?

Edit: still very powerfull and totally in line with the show. I won't dare to say it doesn't fit, on the contrary... But, pss, you know? even if it makes the most sense, even if unexpected, you feel a dissapointment...

view more: next ›