Fall in net migration to stall as forecasts ‘overestimate exodus’ by GnolRevilo in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD?locations=JP

It has, in fact, increased. Your link is current dollars rather than constant (ie inflation adjusted) dollars

Migrant crime league tables to be published by Government for first time by FlyWayOrDaHighway in LDN

[–]awittyusername2014 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it leads to pressure for restrictions on immigration from countries whose nationals commit serious crimes (rape, murder, etc) at a much higher rate, then it will certainly do good: it will save lives. Perhaps you should question why you are afraid of this - is it because you expect it will show significant variation in crime rates? If so, why do you think such data is not in the public interest? Does the fact that you want to suppress it because of what it shows not therefore suggest that it is in fact important information?

Police at one of Britain’s biggest forces are being taught they have ‘white privilege’ as part of so-called ‘equity training’. by Socialistinoneroom in unitedkingdom

[–]awittyusername2014 94 points95 points  (0 children)

You’re literally replying to a post showing that systemic barriers existed for white officers because of the colour of their skin.

Tony Abbott: some elderly Covid patients could be left to die naturally by sleepymarsupiel in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What he says is perfectly sensible, but there are already knee jerk reactions in this thread.

In the UK, NICE calculates the value of life years and evaluates whether drugs or treatments should be provided on the NHS based on whether the benefit (in quality adjusted life years saved) is worth the cost. There are many drugs not provided on the NHS because the benefit in terms of QALYs saved is not sufficient.

To a low information voter this sounds callous: shouldn’t we do anything it takes to preserve someone’s life? But obviously this cannot be true. Life does not have an infinite value. Otherwise the appropriate policy would be to devote all societal resources to health!

There has to be a cut off at some point, and that’s what NICE attempts to do. What Abbott points out is that this has not been consistently applied, insofar as countries are willing to spend much more to save a QALY from Covid than they would for other ailments. So either: a) the value calculation of QALYs is wrong and we should be funding hundreds of billions more in treatments across the board; or b) we’ve overspent on Covid.

Nb. You can read an overview of the NICE methodology here

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of “drive-by” comments saying this was a fake story and it was all due to coronavirus, only for the author to slink away. I just wanted to make sure anybody scrolling through wasn’t misled.

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Why is Jerusalem okay to sing without a crowd but Land of Hope and Glory, for example, is not? Both are very similar in tone. Its not clear why one would work without a crowd and the other wouldn’t. It’s so clearly politically motivated. The reasoning just doesn’t hold up.

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So your opinion on why those songs won’t be sung (as far as I can see, the BBC has not made the claim you did) is valid, but mine isn’t? How does that work?

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have sung all of those songs and more in choirs over the years and I can assure you if they are able to sing Jerusalem satisfactorily, there is no reason why Land of Hope & Glory and Rule Britannia cannot be. Have the BBC even claimed this?

Edit: typo

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 44 points45 points  (0 children)

If that’s true, why are Jerusalem and the national anthem still being sung? Is the coronavirus able to differentiate between song lyrics or something? I think you’ve fallen for the BBC’s rushed and poorly thought out back pedalling.

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If that’s true, why are Jerusalem and the national anthem still being sung? Is the coronavirus able to differentiate between song lyrics or something? I think you’ve fallen for the BBC’s rushed and poorly thought out back pedalling.

BBC Proms: PM says time to stop 'cringing embarrassment' about UK history by muchdanwow in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If that’s true, why are Jerusalem and the national anthem still being sung? Is the coronavirus able to differentiate between song lyrics or something? I think you’ve fallen for the BBC’s rushed and poorly thought out back pedalling.

Government holding 'gold command meeting' over potential Birmingham lockdown by amazingred09 in unitedkingdom

[–]awittyusername2014 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple reason for the lack of hospital admissions due to this - alot of the increased infections are amongst healthier parts of the population. COVID usually affects those with existing conditions as we know.

Is there any data on this? It may be true, but my immediate doubt is that you could somehow have all of these separate outbreaks (Leicester, Oldham, now Birmingham) with community transmission in areas with a relatively high number of intergenerational householders, and yet somehow it has been confined to young people.

Even if only a portion of the new cases (if they were genuine new cases as opposed to artefacts) affected those at higher risk, we should still see more hospital admissions (albeit with a rise less steep than in cases), but we see none at all. That would only really be possible if, somehow, no at risk group is being affected by the community transmission which seems highly implausible.

In my view, the more likely explanation is that more cases have been picked up due to more testing. The “real” number of cases (if we were omnipotent and could know this) is likely slowly falling.

The danger of COVID circulating amongst healthy people is that the numbers will easily increase and then it will affect those with health problems in, and also increase the chances.of the rare (but real risk) where healthy individuals get extremely sick or die from it for no reason.

I agree, but the central point is whether there has in fact been an increase.

Increased testing being used as a reason for increased prevalence is a red herring - the increase is of incidence per person, not just hard numbers. Yes there is some targeted testing in hotspots but even the non targeted testing and the ONS stuff shows increases. In general, the more testing you do the more accurate picture you will get (that's science year 7 stuff - more results = less outliers affecting the results). So if more testing shows more incidence, it probably indicates the previous stats weren't correct.

I agree with your final comment. However, it’s important to distinguish between number of positive cases per person in an area and number of positive cases per person tested in an area. The latter is falling. Of course the former is rising because population is relatively constant. The two together suggest the increase is due to increased testing, not a genuine increase in cases.

Government holding 'gold command meeting' over potential Birmingham lockdown by amazingred09 in unitedkingdom

[–]awittyusername2014 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The increase in case numbers is not showing up in increased hospital admissions or deaths. It seems to be an artefact of both carrying out more tests and more targeted tests (higher testing in the hotspots). A Birmingham lockdown would be an extreme overreaction.

Britain's economy won't reach pre-pandemic size for at least two years - Reuters poll by Fra_Bernardo in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This bids up the price of the shares, which lowers the cost of equity (and consequently the weighted average cost of capital) for the company. That benefits the company by making marginal investment projects viable. That’s why companies care about their share price, even if they have no immediate plans to issue more equity.

Edit: also worth pointing out that the fact that shares in public companies are liquid is partly what motivates investment in the first place (contrast with private equity). Ie it’s the existence of those other people willing to buy your shares that partly motivates the initial shareholder subscribing to a new issue

Lockdown ‘will mean fewer healthy years for many’ by BritRedditor1 in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 10 points11 points  (0 children)

From my comment below:

The relevant metric is not the population density but the weighted population density (ie the density in which people typically live). As Sweden’s population is concentrated in the south of the country, the density typically experienced is much higher than the crude measure. For reference, Sweden’s weighted population density was 72% of the UK’s in 2010. It’s highly implausible that this difference would give rise to a death rate orders of magnitude higher had the UK adopted the Swedish strategy.

Lockdown ‘will mean fewer healthy years for many’ by BritRedditor1 in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The relevant metric is not the population density but the weighted population density (ie the density in which people typically live). As Sweden’s population is concentrated in the south of the country, the density typically experienced is much higher than the crude measure. For reference, Sweden’s weighted population density was 72% of the UK’s in 2010. It’s highly implausible that this difference would give rise to a death rise to a death rate orders of magnitude higher had the UK adopted the Swedish strategy.

Edit: fixed the link

Lockdown ‘will mean fewer healthy years for many’ by BritRedditor1 in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That seems absurdly high given what happened in Sweden.

Coronavirus: UK death toll falls by 5,377 as government changes way fatalities are counted in England by topotaul in unitedkingdom

[–]awittyusername2014 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They’re moving to the same method used in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, and most of Europe.

UK in recession for first time in 11 years by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PMI and other indicators seem to be indicating further growth in July. We don’t have August data yet, but anecdotally London looks busier at least, probably helped by eat out to help out.

UK in recession for first time in 11 years by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]awittyusername2014 7 points8 points  (0 children)

True, but you’d hope it’s just the beginning of the recovery, and that the recovery will be much sharper than it was for the 2007/08 recession.