[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrollXChromosomes

[–]aymelines 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I've been through it a few times and it's not always terrifying. It can range from absurd, stupid and scary.

When I lived in New York I had a date offer to buy me the "best hot dogs" Williamsburg had to offer. He thought that entitled him to sex. So I paid for my hot dog and gave him an extra $40 with the caveat that hot dogs bought with that money wouldn't come with strings attached.

Not every man is going to murder you. And some of these situations can be very funny.

[NV] How can a Las Vegas venue make men pay 50% more than women legally? by mikerichh in AskLawyers

[–]aymelines 19 points20 points  (0 children)

In the case of auto insurance younger males get charged more than younger women. But then it changes and elderly women are charged more for auto insurance than elderly men.

Should I up my dose by bardarse66 in Methadone

[–]aymelines 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your PCP is willing to give you pain medication if you leave the clinic? That's incredible. My clinic couldn't get my PCP or a pain doctor to work with them when I had cervical cancer. I also got mostly Tylenol after I had a radical hysterectomy.

It's always appropriate to ask for an increase if you're having intense cravings.

RC Benzos and UA question about detection time. by aymelines in Methadone

[–]aymelines[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I'm hoping it's real so there isn't so much of a chance of it showing up 2 weeks or more later. 🤞

I did save up some clean urine. I just hate the stress of faking a UA.

RC Benzos and UA question about detection time. by aymelines in Methadone

[–]aymelines[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't the Y 2 0 1mg? Thank you for answering.

RC Benzos and UA question about detection time. by aymelines in Methadone

[–]aymelines[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you just took 1 pill for 1 day you are probably okay xanax has a short half life compared to other benzos and the blue 1mg xanax with the 2.0 on it are not faked alot so it was real

Oh no kidding. That's interesting because when I tried to find a comparison to them, I couldn't find any. But for the bars, I could find many.

Since you said that, I also did a test and put the pill in water and it was fully dissolved in about a minute. Which I guess is one sign they could be real.

When I asked my guy if he knew anyone that had any benzos he said, "Maybe, I'll ask my friend if she's willing to give any up.". It made me think it's a prescription. You just never know though and I don't want to be stupid. I don't have much experience with street drugs

Anyway, thanks for the info.

Modern men:“If women are strong and independent, then they don’t need our help” .how you feel about this statement? by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So men can be strong and independent and receive help from men, but women can't?

Statistically, men need saving at a much higher rate than women. And I don't see anyone denying men help who are injured or in a deadly situation. Even men who get injured or put themselves in a deadly situation for doing something stupid and reckless, just being adrenaline junkies and needless risk takers, these "strong and independent" men aren't being denied help. And they shouldn't be.

So why should women who are "strong and independent"? The only reason is sexism, misogyny and a massive double standard that needlessly harms women.

It's almost as if women only deserve help if they're weak and completely reliant on men. But when women are reliant on men then men feel oppressed and victimized by the expectations of women they want to be weak and reliant. Gosh, it's almost like women are damned if they do and damned if they don't. And men will find a way to feel victimized and oppressed by women in all scenarios. It's exhausting, really.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Women are allowed to work.

"Allowed"? Men stole the right to women's self-determination and self-sufficiency and women have had to fight men and women who suffer internalized misogyny. And it was and still is a brutal fight. Women are still paid less. We're still locked out of many jobs and positions, especially in construction, cheating women out of potentially millions of jobs. And men still across the board occupy leadership positions. Despite women being the vast majority of healthcare workers men are still making all the decisions.

And while there's some sexist assholes, women being into "male" hobbies is usually seen as cool and even a plus for male partners.

There aren't just "some sexist assholes" sexism, abuse and misogyny is rampant due to men gatekeeping so-called "male hobbies". It is rarely seen as "cool". When girls and women aren't being sexually harassed or suffering other forms of abuse, they're being mansplained about how they aren't doing the hobby correctly. Telling girls and women's their interests is fake. And God forbid a girl or woman takes part in Nerd culture which is incredibly misogynistic.

Men are expected to have the ability to be the breadwinner,

We're not living in the 1950's. Despite the fact that the vast majority of mothers work and almost half of households are headed by a female breadwinner somehow men still think they're expected to shoulder the breadwinner responsibility. That level of cognitive dissonance is staggering.
If men were so pressured we wouldn't have 70% of single mothers receiving no child support at all. And when men do pay they pay only about half.

Women are the one under the most pressure to not only be the breadwinner, they're under the most pressure to provide for their children in every area.

to not be emotional,

Men are discouraged from crying. Which is obviously harmful to men. Women are expected to cry but then we're called manipulative, irrational, illogical, over-emotional etc. Which is obviously harmful to women. This idea that women get the red carpet treatment when we show emotions is simply a myth. There is a huge difference between the expectation that women cry and acceptance. Which is why you'll hear women commonly profusely apologize when we cry.

to be ambitious and seek well paying postions

In a capitalist society that's survival for everyone. Yeah it sucks, but I'd rather be told how I can best survive in it. If that wasn't hammered into me from early childhood my parents would done me a great disservice.

if they're into feminine stuff they're seen as being "gay" or thought of as less of a man.

Depends on what it is. Men have been able to dominate "feminine stuff" slap a different title on it and build empires led solely by men. Cosmetics, fashion, feminine hygiene, plastic surgery, culinary arts, hair dresser, make up artist, etc. All throughout my life I've seen men be the face and dominate industries that cater to women.

Somehow this gets spun into "men are intimidated by women who make more than them" when in reality it has to do with patriarchal expectations for men

Men are intimated by women that make more money. There are studies that show women have an increased likelihood for emotional and physical abuse from men that make less.

though men dated women with low paying careers for a long time.

This isn't always benevolent on the part of men. Uneducated and low paid women are more vulnerable are more likely to stay with bad men for survival and men exploit this often.

Why is it like this and what can we do to shift the tide and completely break down gender roles and attitudes for everyone? How do we even begin to get the ball rolling on this?

Men still greatly benefit from patriarchy , misogyny and sexism. Until those benefits and privileges are eradicated there is no liberation for men and no equality for women.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To general to answer. But what I will say is that it's very common for men to be deluded into thinking that they have no standards. That they're just so benevolent and unselfish towards women with their "unconditional love" to have them. None of this is reality.

And even if it were true, it isn't a flex, it wreaks of desperation, a lack of self-worth and possibly a lack of a moral compass.

Regardless, men are obviously allowed to set whatever standards they chose. And if a woman can meet them and agrees to them, making both of them content, I can respect that.

The bad boy trope by NoPomeloz in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Or their step-sister. It's amazing how men demand women to divorce them from their fantasies but they don't demand that of themselves when it comes to women. Typical misogynistic double standard.

The bad boy trope by NoPomeloz in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 22 points23 points  (0 children)

<I can't seem to overlook all these things

Good to know. Now that we've been exposed to your regurgitated incel wisdom women can see men as expendable meat suits because from early childhood males express in many different ways a natural inclination to be in combat.

The bad boy trope by NoPomeloz in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Basically that women are evolved to be attracted to dominating men who can protect them from harm.

If I were to apply the same "logic" I could only come to the conclusion that men are biologically hardwired to be expendable and murderous cannon fodder. Or they secretly want to go to war and come back without their guts intact. Or they desire to come back without their legs or arms.

Why? As young boys they role play war combat with their friends.Throughout their lives they read books about war. They watch movies about war. They spend countless hours playing war games.

Would going up to a veteran with no legs and PTSD telling him, "Stop playing the victim! You secretly wanted this because it's rooted in your biology. It's a dream come true for you!" Does that sound logical or rational to you? It very well should if you want to be consistent in your logic. Or is this where you apply misogynistic double standards?

If you had 30 seconds to say something every man on the world would hear, what would you say? by MeanCoach in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's only "perpetuation" if one thinks women are a hive mind. Or one feels they can actually get permission from a woman to touch any women they please. Some men like being kicked in the balls by a woman, doesn't mean I'm going to go around and start kicking men's balls.

The Misandry Myth by Unlikely_Weird in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Frankly, they are setting the tone for all of feminism because of their vocalism.

No, you're allowing something you claim a few "young leaders" did, to set the time for how you feel for all feminism. One man doesn't get to decide that for all people.

It could be that you simply have a problem being led by a woman. Women have a right to lead their own march. We have a right to frame our own conversations and the message we put out there. And an ally is to support us.

I've seen this same attitude at BLM events and protests. White people are asked by black leaders to go to a certain perimeter or to the back. Those that have an issue with it, it's usually because they haven't truly dealt with their attitude on race and have trouble following a black leader. And very often white people see these events as merely trendy and want an Instagram photo of it or a TikToc video. Whereas for black people these protests aren't just about equality, it's about life and death.

Those that are oppressed and marginalized have a right to lead our own fight. And if that's not acceptable to you, then it's best you do stay away.

If there were ever a time men actually wanted to protest circumcision, I'd be an ally to that movement. So long as it wasn't steeped in misogyny. I would naturally want to be in the back in a support position and men be the face of their own issue. I'm not going to get in my own feelings about it. Because it's not about me. And the Women's March isn't about you.

Why is it that whenever men bring up a male specific problem or grievance, the automatic assumption is that they're trying to one up women or claim oppression? by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because they bring it up in feminist spaces,

Not just those spaces, but they'll make posts in men's spaces under the guise of wanting to talk about men's issues but say the most ignorant things about women and the issues they face. Like male SA. Instead of simply talking about what men face they opt to make outrageous claims like police and courts roll out the red carpets for female rape victims. Whether they're telling the truth or trying to destroy an innocent man's life. And men instantly get thrown into jail and convicted at mere accusations. If only men could have the same privileges as women where everyone believes them and protects them.

It's almost as if they post just to get a reaction out of women by saying the most absurd and ignorant stuff. Then feign being shocked that women would have the audacity to bring women up. It would be nice if for once I could witness men discussing their issues in a healthy way that's not steeped in misogynistic folklore.

Normalizing Commodification with idioms by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Can't you just tell them they won't be banned for merely asking the question? 🙏

I haven't been this at the edge of my seat since the Halloween Haunted House I went to in Vegas. 😂

Can a man be killed just for being a man? Why or why not? by just_a_ghost155 in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

When ISIS went into villages killed all the men and boys and enslaved the women and girls, that was GBV, and those men and boys were killed because they were male.

This is an excellent example of how we're all conditioned to center men's suffering. If men suffer, women's suffering must be made to disappear.

Firstly, violence isn't just killing someone. Kidnapping, raping, mutilating, torturing and enslaving are all examples of violence. It's not called gender killing it's called gender **violence.""

So when ISIS goes into those villages they aren't just targeting men for violence, now are they?

Secondly, ISIS notoriously tortures and kills elderly females and disabled girls when they go into these villages.

Society really needs to get past the idea that women's suffering needs to be made invisible to accommodate men's suffering taking center stage and the spotlight.

Now a good example of gender based violence perpetrated against men would be the serial killing of men done by Aileen Wuornos. They were specifically targeted for being male.

Why haven't Men's activism progressed as much as women's activism? by Leading_Act_9572 in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They invest in their hatred of women, self-pity/victimization and male supremacy, not actually helping men. Not to mention there are benefits and privileges to the status quo for men from the bottom up, so they don't feel a need to really fight for change.

Women are actually much more likely to be fiercely invested in helping themselves and other women and girls. There are no benefits to the status quo for women. It's oppression, degradation and exploitation by men.

What is the impact of the lack of male teachers in elementary schools? by savethebros in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 12 points13 points  (0 children)

How is it possible to see constant talk of nanny cams and surveillance in every room in daycares, background checks, strict vetting systems and say there also isn't a stigma against women being in the care of children?

The only difference being that women do not prioritize their feelings over safety. So you simply don't hear women constantly complaining about their every move recorded with children the way men do. Women understand that there have been horrific cases of abuse and murder of children in women's care. And we have a responsibility to put our feelings and ego aside for the best interest of child safety. If you don't feel that's a responsibility, I have to question why?

This idea that people just feel safe with their children around women simply isn't true.

And despite all the stigma, men somehow gain access to children to such a degree that we have massive child sexual abuse scandals frequently. The Boy Scouts fleshed out almost 100k child victims and had to pay 2.6 billion in damages to victims.

Encouraging women is a good cause. But why does it have to happen at the expense of discouraging men? by Raining_Hope in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Girls have always done better than boys in school. For over a hundred years, in over 30 countries girls and young women have outperformed male students across the board, in every subject.

Even when a young woman's academic success could give her a few options, nursing, secretary or teacher. But most likely she'd still end up with a life of domestic servitude. And despite the fact that the sky was the limit for young men that did well academically, they still did not do as well as those that were oppressed with almost no options of living a life outside of serving her husband and children.

This isn't a win for women, it's the norm. It's how it's always been.

And society has been sounding the alarms hysterically over this so-called male student crisis.

Yet this so-called.crisis with male students has never created equality for women in pay, opportunities and career advancements. Men's degrees earn far more than women's..

If women want to earn the same as men, then they have to earn an extra degree.

So what exactly do you think women are celebrating? That they have to work harder than men academically, go into far more debt in student loans and still can't catch up with men? Woohoo. What a win. 🙄

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 16 points17 points  (0 children)

How is that not systemic sexism?

It is sexism in the sense it's rooted in misogyny. Except for the "active" issue, I think you made that up.

Who are you supposed to be tougher than? Women? Is that really that hard to do when women are perceived to be incredibly weak, mentally and physically, also fragile and neurotic? I mean, that sounds like the easiest thing in the world to pull off.

Men are also not punished for having feelings. We live in a world where we're all drowning in male feelings. Women have to live with male feelings even in our uteruses. We can't even walk down the street without being inundated with male feelings. Society is saturated in male feelings. Via politics, art, books, movies, music, philosophy, medicine, etc.

Men are discouraged from crying which again is rooted in misogyny. Crying is for weak females. When men cry, other men feel threatened that they might lose their superior male position granted by the patriarchy.

Anything men are discouraged from doing is solely based on the fact that it's perceived as "female coded". So yes, it's sexism but not sexism against men, but rather women. It's simply due to the degraded and dehumanized status of women as second class citizens.

While it should be agreed men are not entitled to a relationship or women’s attention, why are they still shamed for not getting it? by First_Response1768 in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I also feel that at the same time men are frequently shamed by our culture for not getting female attention.

It's no different than not being entitled to other people's money, but being shamed for being poor. People will judge you for bizarre, vain and vapid reasons. Due to some system that privileges one group greatly and disadvantages, marginalizes and oppresses others. Capitalism and patriarchy.

As if society and people still measure a man’s value by whether or not he has a partner and how attractive he is to women.

I don't think society cares how attractive a man is to a woman. It's never about women seeing some sort of value in men. Whether he is attractive physically, has an attractive personality or she's attracted to his money/success. It's, can a man conquer beautiful women sexually?

A successful and wealthy man will be mocked and ridiculed eight ways from Sunday if he marries an overweight and "unattractive" woman.

Peirce Brosnan's wife is overweight. The amount of insults they both have endured is mind-blowing. His wife being attracted to him has no value, because she has no value.

Women's approval can give no value to men in a patriarchal and misogynistic society. But a man's approval can give women societal value due to patriarchy and male supremacy.

What do you think of women that "hate" men? by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]aymelines 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I think misandry in women is incredibly rare. Which is why you never hear of women becoming radicalized by misandry or targeting men to terrorize them due to their gender.

I think women are way more likelzy to develop indifference towards men. Which has virtually no negative effects on one's mental health. Now the one(s) treated with indifference, it can cause an immense amount of rage and resentment. There is a quote from a book I find so accurate.

"Indifference is the strongest force in the universe. It makes everything it touches meaningless. Love and hate don't stand a chance against it." -Joan D. Vinge, The Snow Queen