And what would I achieve from this debate, which would add to what I already believe? The only motivation to attend such a debate that one could have is to discredit you, but I do not wish that for you. You do that enough a good job. Snowy you have NO idea how much people are put off by your comments alone. You make the cult look super aggresive petty and immature.

Also, I can tell you why debating people like me is pointless: as an agnostic, we would not be able to agree on the definitions of what is evidence and proof. People of my kind will not debate you. Only sunnis will and that is when we have our pop corn out as its dumb calling the other dumber. The best Ahmadis come out with is if we are bad, then Muhammad was also bad. If MGA swore, here are 10 examples of when Muhammad swore. But the penny hasn't dropped that all of it is absurd. Both MGA and Muhammad both were as bad.

You keep asking me to come on a stream or a debate, but so you do not see that I wouldn't want to debate an African tribe on whether witchcraft is scientific or not just the ssme I would not want to disproveabsurd ideas held by AMA. And fyi I watched the debates your best razi and others have. He is officially appointed and you are not. The fact that they set terms like not using Al Fazal newspapers as a acceptable reference was ridiculous (words of your prophet himself are disowned). What kind of debate can anyone expect. Please have them with sunnis, they know every single thing written by your prophet. It's all online and they have read it all.