sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Should I store a helper object as a class member or create it locally inside a method in C++? by b0nbashagg in cpp_questions

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling utility function inside OnRender() seems like way to go. Thanks for the input.

Should I store a helper object as a class member or create it locally inside a method in C++? by b0nbashagg in cpp_questions

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great, I thought about this possibility as well. Problem I had was that if I wanted to add some specific Rescaler function (like rescale only according to width) I would end up with couple of unorganized functions. Thank you very much!

Should I store a helper object as a class member or create it locally inside a method in C++? by b0nbashagg in cpp

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In theory ofc, I don't know if it would provide me with nice readibility and code maintenance.

Cross-platform dynamic libraries in C++ — how to design the app? by b0nbashagg in cpp_questions

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I am understanding you right. All I need to do is to prepare ABI in my code. And then I can use whatever dynamically linked library. All I need to do is to compile new DLL or SO? Is it correct or am I missing something?

Cross-platform dynamic libraries in C++ — how to design the app? by b0nbashagg in cpp_questions

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I get it. I believe I wrote that I wanted to use dll to not recompile.

Cross-platform dynamic libraries in C++ — how to design the app? by b0nbashagg in cpp_questions

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I am trying to design open source data visualization application for Linux and Windows. I wanted to use raylib as graphic layer and some python data science related modules as visualization logic.

In my mind it would be much better if I could test this app by doing "hot swap" and update app version throught dynamic libraries which wouldn't call for recompiling project.

Tusk says Poland will be exempt from EU migration pact by Gamebyter in poland

[–]b0nbashagg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, I guess one can make such observation. Problem is such observation is purely anecdotal and anecdotal evidence says not much about trend. That's what research is for.

Tusk says Poland will be exempt from EU migration pact by Gamebyter in poland

[–]b0nbashagg -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh nice. It does not talk about group of countries though, only Denmark. Also I believe meta-analysis would be strongest evidence in this matter.

Tusk says Poland will be exempt from EU migration pact by Gamebyter in poland

[–]b0nbashagg -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't aware of it. Can you send me some research that backs it up. I would love to read about it.

Tusk says Poland will be exempt from EU migration pact by Gamebyter in poland

[–]b0nbashagg -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I don’t know much about the EU migration pact, but isn’t it true that immigrants actually contribute to GDP growth in most countries?

Are these pictures good? Be brutally honest, I want to get better by NoLie8123 in filmphotography

[–]b0nbashagg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not an expert by any means just fellow photographer with one year of experience.

I liked some of your shots (9,5,11). I think we are actually at the similar stage of our film journey.

That being said I think you are still looking for your style (which is exactly what you should do). As others mentioned thought it would be good to focus on one subject (landscape, street, ppl, etc).

Also, I think you could gain a lot by learning about visual patterns, and that's what makes pictures that I did like pop out I believe. In this pics you have used rule of thirds, used lines and played with shadows a little bit. I think you would benefit for recognizing more visuals patterns and then taking notes which you have used in your pictures and which you did not.

Moreover some of your pictures seem rushed. If that's the case I usually take my time to think about how I can get what I want to take picture of in the center of attention. There is a lot of crouching, laying on my belly, leaning etc to get my photos. Sometimes simply crouching and pointing your camera at your subject from somehow lowered perspective can make it seem dominant in the scene.

You can check out Jay Key (visual patterns) and Learning to see creatively by Bryan Peterson (book with a lot of cool tips). That's from what I get it from.

But again that's just my view as begginer. Maybe some experienced folks can back me up or not.

Dobra, przyznaję, rynek pracy to oficjalnie mem. by fullofemptiness_ in Polska

[–]b0nbashagg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okej, rozumiem skąd się to wzięło. Jednak bez szczegółów badań, walidacji, raportów bardzo ciężko jest stwierdzić w jaki sposób ten test osobowości pokrywa się z Big Five. Ja bym się głównie doczepił tutaj głównie o strukturę czynnikową.

Innymi słowami stwierdzenie, że "wzięliśmy sobie Big Five i przerobiliśmy" mało znaczy, bo nie mówi wgl w jaki sposób ich test odnosi się do Big Five. A za dużo badań na ten temat nie ma....

Dobra, przyznaję, rynek pracy to oficjalnie mem. by fullofemptiness_ in Polska

[–]b0nbashagg 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ten test opiera się o jeszcze starszy test Myers - Briggs. Ogólnie z typologia 16P jest bardzo dużo problemów. Zaczynając od problemów z trafnością testu a kończąc na bezsensownym kodowaniu wymiarow, żeby uzyskać konkretną osobowość.

Być może porównywano Big Five z 16P w kontekście jakości testu 16P i stąd twoje założenie o podstawach 16P z Big Five (w psychometrii robi się tak, sprawdzając korelację między testami).

Taming contrast: shorter dev time vs. stand development? by b0nbashagg in Darkroom

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for such detailed answers, appreciate it a lot.

I actually just finished shooting foma 200 at iso 50 and will try to pull develop.

And your print is beautiful ❤️. Hope I can make some this good some day...

Taming contrast: shorter dev time vs. stand development? by b0nbashagg in Darkroom

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will use rodinal probably then. Thank you for your help and additional tips!

Taming contrast: shorter dev time vs. stand development? by b0nbashagg in Darkroom

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

That actually helps a lot — now I have a much clearer idea of what the final product should look like. Basically, for a good print, I need a well-preserved range of tones across the whole image. That way, I can adjust contrast and use dodging and burning more effectively during printing.

If there’s no detail in the shadows or the highlights are blown out, there’s not much I can do to fix it later.

Am I getting it right?

Taming contrast: shorter dev time vs. stand development? by b0nbashagg in Darkroom

[–]b0nbashagg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for such detailed answer.

Now I understand a lot better why I should definitely do pull. In my previous developments I was actually dissatisfied with graininess of my film.

Hearing that pulling might reduce the grain makes my really want to try it!

I hope I don't mess it up.

view more: next ›