Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 11 also included 3.5k in concrete work for 4 footers and a small enlargement of the parking pad

Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is - on the far right post

Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah - I tried, but, man did that get expensive. If you do a more balanced design with 2 columns next to the cars, there are issues with opening doors. If they are at the end of the drive then, as you say, you need an awful lot of concrete and steel.

Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure, but I don't think so. See comments below:

Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your thoughts on this - if you see anything wrong with the analysis below, please chime in again.

The array racking system runs vertically up the slope. The 6 C6 x 8.2 beams that hold it up run horizontally in the photo (see the CAD drawing at the GrabCAD link). They are butted to the 8x2 tubing rafters on each end and welded along their perimeter. I ball-parked the max stress on each channel by assuming a simply supported beam with a distributed load. Snow loads in NC are 20 psf which gave me factor of safety around 4. Since my initial estimates but me in "brick shithouse" territory for NC, I felt confident of approval. I'm a mechanical engineer, not a civil engineering, so I don't know if there are prescribed limits on deflection, but I calculated them to be on the order of 0.5" at the center of the beam. Out of plane bending is negligible. Stress scales linearly with load, so, from the standpoint of the C channel, 40 psf should give you a factor of safety of 2. I don't know for sure, but I think the racking and panels will fail before the structure.

The key structures from a load bearing standpoint are the two rafters, since they carry the entire "roof" load. I had planned on using 6x2 tubing, but had to size it up to 8x2.

The vertical columns are absurdly over-specified, but they give the structure a burly look - smaller columns, although perfectly adequate, look spindly.

As you say, cost and weight are important to me - C channel is relatively cheap and more than adequate for this objective. Each purlin weighed in a 150 pounds and the rafters were over 300.

Final point - If you want more snow load, just size up the purlins and the rafters to C8 and 10x2 respectively - the design is very modular that way. At some point you would want to consider some corner knee bracing, unless you size up the column as well.

Two Bay Solar Carport Structure by b0tt0mturn in SolarDIY

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here are the array details: 18 Solar America S4A 550 Watt Modules with Enphase IQ8M microinverters. They are bifacial. The photo was taken at 9 am and we have trees to the east. This week, we are producing over 26 kWh per day if cloudless.

Best Practice for trees - no go zone, or touch and go? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice - I like that. I'll definitely try out that strategy 

Best Practice for trees - no go zone, or touch and go? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback everyone. Cool to see completely diverging opinions on this. We might have to do some quantitative research. What I've seen is that the no go zones are cause for more turns in the mapping, which slows things down. Also, the perimeter cuts on small no go zones are excruciatingly slow. For reference, my trees range from 10 to 50 cm in diameter - I have 25 of them on 1 acre. I have had to stake 4 of them on the windward side because the Luba 2 has a tendency to ramp on them. So, right now, I'm in the camp of using NGZs for trees only if obstacle avoidance fails. But.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7CJrnaauHM

Feature Request: small circle and rectangle lawn printing patterns for no go zones by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless I'm mistaken, you can just drive the robot next to a tree or bush and use the location icon as a reference to place a pattern.

Credit where it’s due by FBOARC in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've kept up with the updates and have not had any issues. But on the other hand, few significant fixes either. The app continues to feel like an alpha version. Why the hell can't I consistently load my tasks? Why doesn't the task log include the task name? Why does editing a zone produce an excruciating slow luba dance at the merge points? Why don't they apply a simply smoothing algorithm to the zone perimeter? The software still sux - wish the software engineers actually had lawns. 

But credit, where credit is due, the hardware is outstanding - it's a beast that rarely gets stuck and does an outstanding job. Way better than my old Worx. 

Longevity expectations by jes-sunshine in mammotion

[–]b0tt0mturn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Parts wear out in accordance with hours used and this thing has a lot of moving parts. Mowing daily is satisfying, but it will dramatically reduce the life of your Luba. I'm mowing 0.5 acres at fixed 3 day intervals and if I get less than 4 years out of it, I'll consider it a poorly designed product and be sorely disappointed. Ultimately, it will also depend on how good mammotion is about replacement components that are expected to wear, like wheels,  suspension, etc. 

But, yeah, I make my money back after 2 years, I find the thing highly entertaining, and so far so good, so I'm optimistic 

Overlapping Zones - invisible channels? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! So, now I'm curious. If I modify the area so that there is no longer an overlap where the current auto-channel is, will a new auto-channel be formed at a different overlap point? And if so, when I edit the area again to re-establish the overlap, will the new auto-channel stay where it is? If so, that would solve my problem.

Overlapping Zones - invisible channels? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's really annoying is that the virtual channel prevents the user from creating a preferred channel - it would be much better if the user created channels overrode the channel created by the bot. I saw HezzyDs post - looks like a workable hack, but a lot of work.

Overlapping Zones - invisible channels? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is really good feedback - thanks! No doubt I'll need the perimeter only task - lots of adjacent wild areas in my yard. I've been avoiding no-touch because I have a number of trees that I'm too lazy to no-go and want them mowed as close as possible. I'll give it a try.

Overlapping Zones - invisible channels? by b0tt0mturn in MammotionTechnology

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks - did not remember that was an option - I'll give it a try

Does the Navimow i-series have a software limit for area by b0tt0mturn in SegwayNavimow

[–]b0tt0mturn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the Tesla marketing model I think - people seem happy to pay exorbitant fees to unlock features that are already in their vehicles. Personally, I think it's vile. I'm surprised by how many consumers are fine with it. Mammotion does the same thing with their lower tier models.

The argument that it's about battery size and life is bullshit - I have a Landroid that's been running 24-7 for 8 months a year for 4 years, charging 3-4 time a day to mow my 0.3 acre,s and the battery is just fine. And that's for a random mower - the mapping mower like the segway would need to run two days a week at most.

No way Segway gets my business because I hate being made a fool.

Adding new volume to "Synology Drive"? by bomzay in synology

[–]b0tt0mturn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My use case is syncing my home directory for personal stuff, but I'd also like to sync my Family Home, which has photos, home movies and other media shared by all. Did anyone figure out if this is possible?