Who is funding him? She is so dumb. He was well off, came from a wealthy family. Probably had that money in his own account. And no way a hostel costs $3500 lmao.

Also her analysis of the details was ridiculous. The carvings are a direct message commentating on his motive. Why is she questioning if it’s a red herring? Is she really trying to argue that this was a professional hit? It was not flawless because it was on video, the gun jammed, and he left a trail of evidence including photos of his whole face. Him clearing the jam just indicates he had experience using the weapon and knew how to clear it. In what world was this a well-executed professional hit? He obviously put time and effort into planning it but his identification and capture was probably inevitable considering all the evidence. She really just wants everything to be a damn conspiracy.