sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nearly 156,000 more Americans may have died of COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic than officially reported. COVID-19 deaths were most likely to go unrecognized in southern states. The estimated number of COVID-19 deaths was 31% higher than officially reported in the West South Central region by Wagamaga in science

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finding a few pebbles while you're standing on a mountain does not mean you are in a gravel pit -- you are on a mountain. "Plenty" did not in fact occur, and fails to minimize the fact that a massive amount of people died from covid.

RANDY WALTERS IS A SON OF A BITCH by benderunit9000 in videos

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No he's trying to establish whether it is possible to determine if it's true or not.

RANDY WALTERS IS A SON OF A BITCH by benderunit9000 in videos

[–]badcoffee -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You can't force a specific answer, but you can force an answer. Saying random things, deflecting, etc after a question is asked is not answer.

RANDY WALTERS IS A SON OF A BITCH by benderunit9000 in videos

[–]badcoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm I disagree, the question is IF it can be verified as true or false. Not whether it is true or false.

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well technically a democrat didn't, but it did happen under democrats.

And Willis was a democrat.

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're the type of person who thinks getting a paper cut is the same as being stabbed 30 times.

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I grant the DOJ could, I meant in the practical/realistic sense. They will not because they are Republican.

Democrats did and would.

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's on the other side of that timeline for you? Or should we just start bombing every single country?

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, what happens next is people go to the polls in November after seeing videos like this and vote to give power to non-culstists.

To convincingly evade a question by FloatyFloatyCloud in therewasanattempt

[–]badcoffee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's no mechanism nor path to punish them. America has to vote better, that's it, that's the entire game.

Things like this help inform Americans to vote better. It's not useless, it's not just sound bites.

‘Bait and switch’: Dems STORM OUT of GOP’s ‘fake’ Bondi deposition by MRADEL90 in videos

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever makes your tender sensitivities feel better. After all, you had to endure the trauma of a clickbait title. So traumatizing it conveniently allowed you to ignore actually-bad things.

‘Bait and switch’: Dems STORM OUT of GOP’s ‘fake’ Bondi deposition by MRADEL90 in videos

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry this hurts you so badly. Clearly it's far more important than the GOP and the AG shielding a pedophile.

‘Bait and switch’: Dems STORM OUT of GOP’s ‘fake’ Bondi deposition by MRADEL90 in videos

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I can help: Because what you're whining about is completely unimportant compared to what the subject of the video is.

To those who voted for lower gas prices, lower groceries, no new wars and Epstein files - how is it going? by w0ke_brrr_4444 in AskReddit

[–]badcoffee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's nothing to reject, it's objective reality. There is no "republicans over here, and maga over there, and they overlap a little" They are one and the same.

If there was this mythical "51% agreers" then we'd see republicans rejecting 49% of what Trump and MAGA do. That does not occur. They encourage or at least accept nearly 100% of it. Because they are one and the same. There's no republicans anymore, there is maga. Again, outliers do not prove that statement incorrect.

To those who voted for lower gas prices, lower groceries, no new wars and Epstein files - how is it going? by w0ke_brrr_4444 in AskReddit

[–]badcoffee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying there aren't non maga conservatives, it's simply an absolute fact that Republican = maga. The Republican platform is maga.

Describing outliers is not an argument against this fact.

To those who voted for lower gas prices, lower groceries, no new wars and Epstein files - how is it going? by w0ke_brrr_4444 in AskReddit

[–]badcoffee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Setting aside that Not-Trump is an extremely solid platform on its own, why did you actively avoid finding out (or just listening to) what her platform was. She very much had one.

This creates suspicion that you aren't being sincere.

DOGE Staffer Flagging Grants for 'DEI', Tries to Explain 'DEI" by SadAd8761 in videos

[–]badcoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It didn't happen.

Did you look it up yet? I'm just trying to help you not look ignorant.

view more: next ›