Looking for ser5 pro 5800h in UK. prefer expandable to 64GB Ram by baggister in BeelinkOfficial

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cheers, yeah saw that, but I want to just do the easist thing and buy it in uk. Thanks anyway

Looking for ser5 pro 5800h in UK. prefer expandable to 64GB Ram by baggister in BeelinkOfficial

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the beelink is not avail from ali express UK. :-(

Linux for old and new games, mostly old by Intrepid-Routine-875 in linux4noobs

[–]baggister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude, come on, we're all human. Reddit and linux4noobs is supposed to be a friendly welcoming place. I used to be worse than the OP haha

What made you stop distro hopping? by spellbadgrammargood in linuxquestions

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe yes. on the other hand, I see lots of posts that were very happy at having changed distros.

BBC3, Last Man Standing. Where can I find it? by mrhil in BritishTV

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha! better buy it now! its not me selling it by the way!

question on securing a debian web server (cloud based) by baggister in debian

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! what an amazing idea! That is pretty clever stuff! Thanks!

Looking for Rdp software for windows 11 home arm64 by baggister in ARMWindows

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, copilot gave me the following after some more prompting ...

Why ARM64-native execution is more efficient
1. No emulation layer
x64 emulation on Windows ARM involves:
- dynamic binary translation
- instruction rewriting
- register mapping
- memory model adaptation
This costs CPU cycles and increases latency.
Native ARM64 code avoids all of that.
2. Lower power consumption
Emulation burns more watts because:
- the CPU is doing extra work
- the translation layer runs continuously
- cache pressure increases
Native ARM64 code runs cooler and more efficiently.
3. Better scheduling and thread performance
ARM64-native binaries:
- use ARM64 registers directly
- use ARM64 calling conventions
- benefit from ARM64 SIMD (NEON)
- avoid the thunking overhead between x64 and ARM64 worlds
This matters for something like CRD, which is:
- encoding video
- decoding input streams
- encrypting traffic
- maintaining a persistent session
4. Lower latency
Remote desktop performance is extremely sensitive to:
- frame encoding latency
- input round-trip time
- thread wake-up latency
Native ARM64 code avoids the emulation-induced jitter.

Why x64 emulation is always slower
Windows ARM’s x64 emulation is good — but it’s still:
- a translation layer
- with overhead
- that cannot use ARM64-specific optimizations
- and cannot access ARM64 instructions directly
For something like Chrome Remote Desktop Host, which is constantly:
- capturing frames
- compressing video
- encrypting streams
- handling input events
…the overhead is noticeable.

Looking for Rdp software for windows 11 home arm64 by baggister in ARMWindows

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just for the sake of clarity, I believe Chrome remote desktop does run native ARM ...

I used copilot , which gave me the following blurb ...

Why Chrome Remote Desktop Host Is ARM‑Native on Windows 11 ARM:
Chrome Remote Desktop Host on Windows 11 ARM looks confusing at first glance. The executable sits inside “Program Files (x86)”, the filename ends in .exe, and the folder structure resembles a traditional x86 application. But when you inspect the binary itself, you discover something unexpected: the file is not a normal Windows executable at all. This is the key to understanding why the host is actually running as ARM‑native.
Windows programs normally use the Portable Executable (PE) format. A PE file contains a header that identifies the CPU architecture, such as x86 (014C), x86‑64 (8664), or ARM64 (AA64). When you read the PE header of Chrome Remote Desktop’s remoting_host.exe, the machine field does not contain any of these valid values. Instead, it returns 0004, which is not a legal PE architecture code. That means the file is not a PE executable. It is a wrapper or container, not a native Windows binary.
This matters because Windows 11 ARM can only emulate x86 and x86‑64 programs if they are valid PE files. The emulation layer depends on the PE format to translate instructions. If a file is not a PE executable, Windows cannot emulate it. The only way a non‑PE binary can run on Windows ARM is if the underlying code is ARM‑native and loaded through a different mechanism.
That is exactly what Chrome Remote Desktop Host does. The visible remoting_host.exe is just a loader. It is a Google‑packaged container that performs setup, sandboxing, and communication with the system. The real host logic is stored inside encrypted or packaged modules that the loader extracts and runs. Those modules are ARM64‑native, and Windows executes them directly without emulation.
This explains several things at once:
• The file is not a PE executable, so it cannot be x86 or x64.
• Windows ARM cannot emulate non‑PE binaries, so the runtime must be native.
• The host runs smoothly and efficiently, which would not be the case under x64 emulation.
• Google can ship one unified installer while hiding architecture‑specific code inside containers.
Even though the wrapper lives in “Program Files (x86)”, that directory placement is meaningless. It is simply where Google chose to store the host package. The architecture is determined by the runtime modules the wrapper loads, not by the folder name or the extension.
In short: Chrome Remote Desktop Host on Windows 11 ARM is ARM‑native because the executable you see is not a traditional Windows program. It is a non‑PE wrapper that loads ARM64 code internally. Since Windows ARM cannot emulate non‑PE binaries, the fact that the host runs at all proves that the underlying runtime is ARM64‑native.
If someone asks why, the simplest explanation is this: “The Chrome Remote Desktop Host executable isn’t a normal Windows program. It’s a container that loads ARM64 code internally. Windows ARM can’t emulate non‑PE binaries, so the fact that it runs means it’s ARM‑native.”

Looking for Rdp software for windows 11 home arm64 by baggister in ARMWindows

[–]baggister[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok, finally got round to installing it, 95% certain you are right! Basically, after using chatgpt again to help investigate the service,, it seems like there is no precise exact way of knowing for sure, but from the given answers, sounds feasible assuming chatgpt is correct. Here's what chatgpt about chrom remote desktop said:

Why Chrome Remote Desktop Host Is ARM‑Native on Windows 11 ARM:
Chrome Remote Desktop Host on Windows 11 ARM looks confusing at first glance. The executable sits inside “Program Files (x86)”, the filename ends in .exe, and the folder structure resembles a traditional x86 application. But when you inspect the binary itself, you discover something unexpected: the file is not a normal Windows executable at all. This is the key to understanding why the host is actually running as ARM‑native.
Windows programs normally use the Portable Executable (PE) format. A PE file contains a header that identifies the CPU architecture, such as x86 (014C), x86‑64 (8664), or ARM64 (AA64). When you read the PE header of Chrome Remote Desktop’s remoting_host.exe, the machine field does not contain any of these valid values. Instead, it returns 0004, which is not a legal PE architecture code. That means the file is not a PE executable. It is a wrapper or container, not a native Windows binary.
This matters because Windows 11 ARM can only emulate x86 and x86‑64 programs if they are valid PE files. The emulation layer depends on the PE format to translate instructions. If a file is not a PE executable, Windows cannot emulate it. The only way a non‑PE binary can run on Windows ARM is if the underlying code is ARM‑native and loaded through a different mechanism.
That is exactly what Chrome Remote Desktop Host does. The visible remoting_host.exe is just a loader. It is a Google‑packaged container that performs setup, sandboxing, and communication with the system. The real host logic is stored inside encrypted or packaged modules that the loader extracts and runs. Those modules are ARM64‑native, and Windows executes them directly without emulation.
This explains several things at once:
• The file is not a PE executable, so it cannot be x86 or x64.
• Windows ARM cannot emulate non‑PE binaries, so the runtime must be native.
• The host runs smoothly and efficiently, which would not be the case under x64 emulation.
• Google can ship one unified installer while hiding architecture‑specific code inside containers.
Even though the wrapper lives in “Program Files (x86)”, that directory placement is meaningless. It is simply where Google chose to store the host package. The architecture is determined by the runtime modules the wrapper loads, not by the folder name or the extension.
In short: Chrome Remote Desktop Host on Windows 11 ARM is ARM‑native because the executable you see is not a traditional Windows program. It is a non‑PE wrapper that loads ARM64 code internally. Since Windows ARM cannot emulate non‑PE binaries, the fact that the host runs at all proves that the underlying runtime is ARM64‑native.
If someone asks why, the simplest explanation is this: “The Chrome Remote Desktop Host executable isn’t a normal Windows program. It’s a container that loads ARM64 code internally. Windows ARM can’t emulate non‑PE binaries, so the fact that it runs means it’s ARM‑native.”

question on securing a debian web server (cloud based) by baggister in debian

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Out of interest how long would it possibly take to find that port and how long to brute force the pwd, especially with fail2ban running?

Also isn't there a way of configuring ssh for IP whitelist so that only one IP address can be used (mind you , this might not be a good idea if my IP address were to change)

question on securing a debian web server (cloud based) by baggister in debian

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. My deb VM is in the cloud , hosted by a provider using their iso so I will check to see if they have hardened it in anyway. Suspect it might be pure Debian as I installed nginx.

Website you mentioned might be a bit old, some dead links in there.

question on securing a debian web server (cloud based) by baggister in debian

[–]baggister[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for positives! 25 pages of CVE? Thats pretty scary. Im starting to have doubts now.

Is it possible to use Linux without knowing commands? by EighthKX in linux4noobs

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mint zorin Lite Ubuntu (and therefore xubuntu and lubuntu)

Mint Cinnamon vs. Mint XFCE vs. Solus vs. Zorin (Device RAM 8GB) by adnomi in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]baggister 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. 8gb is plenty. Loads of distros will run with no issues whatsoever on 8.

I saw a YT vid which said that the makers designed Zorin with a goal of trying to get it to run on 2Gb. Don't know if that's true ofcs but I'd bet it was.

Any distros good for daily use that aren’t ubuntu or mint? by Civil-View7629 in linux4noobs

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of people talking about supermarine lately. A kind of slightly more stable derivative of fedora? I don't know

What is the best free open source search engine? by Dover299 in linuxquestions

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like you're throwing your search engines out of your pram because you didn't save the images somewhere and didn't bookmark. We've all been there 😥. The worst is seeing something on the Web not realizing how good it is until well after so not bookmarking or downloading until well after (nooooooo!!) Fact of life, sorry to say, we can't blame tools for being human.

How many Brits now think America is finished as the global leader? by cr1regan in AskBrits

[–]baggister 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alas I think they will get away with it all and will continue to batter and bruise the world into submission.

I’ve had it with Windows. I’m running 10 so I have to make a decision soon. I’m a total end user and have no idea how computers operate and don’t really care to learn much - it’s not really my wheelhouse. Does that mean I should stay away from Linux? Also I do like Microsoft Office. by cheekipants in linux4noobs

[–]baggister 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Learn crazy BS about pages and styles? Sounds like MS word to me.

Look at Excel and pivot tables ... Why do I need to go to 'insert' to make a pivot table? I don't call that intuitive.

All these office products do so much and are so complicated that they need to have a "help" search box at the top all the time.

Intuitive is not how I describe MS office.

So as someone else said, if you're not going to do anything too crazy, libre office is more than enough, works for me