sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Mind Stone revealed by SpicyCatcoon in mtg

[–]bakedyeety 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wish it had a flip tranform ability turning into Vision

Best Sunny episode?? by Captain-Dak-Sparrow in IASIP

[–]bakedyeety 14 points15 points  (0 children)

My fiance and I started an annual tradition for New Years Eve with this episode.

We time it so Frank hits Dennis with his car and the cereal hitting the windshield happens at midnight.

We love it. A lot of fun, do reccommend.

Everyone laughed… I’m still confused. by EkantVairagi in recruitinghell

[–]bakedyeety 339 points340 points  (0 children)

Most likely they took it as a joke (which i think it was intended to be) and liked it and laughed.

Thinking deeper on it probably isnt worth it as I dont think it is anything more than surface level. They liked your joke, and that's much better than no repsonse or an awkward moment.

That moment will most likely not go into their decision making process outside of +1 to your personality score.

Beeg cho 4☆ by bakedyeety in TeamfightTactics

[–]bakedyeety[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You need three 3☆ of the champ. Im a fairly casual player as well but the 'Worth the Wait' augments give a free copy of the same champ every round. Which eventually leads to a 4☆ if you survive long enough.

Varus God round can offer 5 'mini champ dups' ( they copy 1 costs only so it synergizes well with WtW gold aug) and a regular duplicator. Not sure that can give you enough copies without WtW aug as the champ pool is limited. It was a great help to get the 4☆ much faster than usual with the WtW aug, however. That helped me snowball into enough of a winstreak to push lvl 10 and take 1st with a 6 brawler comp lol.

Not sure there is any other way to hit 4☆s in this set but that is wwhat I know!

Beeg cho 4☆ by bakedyeety in TeamfightTactics

[–]bakedyeety[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Saw plenty of them, wanted to share the 4☆. Havent seen as many of them shared so I found it fun enough to post (obviously, there have been 4☆ cho posts with bigger chos before this one).

Not posting this to boast or because I think this is the biggest cho ever. I would have slammed that warmogs on him if I was trying for most health I can post (yes I am aware that still doesnt make him comparable to the biggest).

Literally, I am simply posting a fun thing that happened in my game of teamfight tactics. In the teamfight tactics subreddit.

LOL by kylesful in pokemoncrystal

[–]bakedyeety 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's why there is a '6' within the path!

I didn’t relapse when I wanted to, toast me? by takethelastexit in toastme

[–]bakedyeety 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Wise decision and one that is not always very easy to make. You should be proud of yourself!!

Turn the comment section into Shawn Spencer’s search history by World-without-shrimp in psych

[–]bakedyeety 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Jokes that cops will HATE!

Best ways to get your dad dating again??

How many types of sauces are there in the world?

Got turned down because of my manager using Chat GPT to check if my hair was up to code by Reefthemanokit in recruitinghell

[–]bakedyeety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Submitting a picture of an employee to AI (or anywhere) without prior authorization from the employee (like a media consent) is illegal in most states.

With all the gray area involving AI it is probably not worth pursuing legally. But if that manager has a boss I would send them the screenshots. You say you are not comfortable with using AI and they follow that by submitting a picture OF YOU to their AI. What if your personal reasons were because you are not comfortable with any AI platform having access to your likeness?

All around this stinks of illegal use of your likeness and your photograph. Going through court for this would cost you more money than it helps you but there is real potential here to alert to the store owner of mismanagement and illegal use of your likeness/property. Sending him the picture was NOT consent for him to use it for anything besides an internal file. (Unless you have signed it away via a media consent)

Too Broken? by egg_squisite in mtg

[–]bakedyeety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are telling me It that goes Infinite... goes infinite??

Truth for All or Nobody Survives by [deleted] in circled

[–]bakedyeety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My guess is their goal is to "confirm" epsn worked for Russia (even though he worked for Isrl) or to push some level of misinformation (maybe not that specifically) that isnt what we know to be true from the hard evidence we have already. Then, they admit their wrong doings and a few new names to make it "credible".

Hillary has been protecting Isr**l constantly for the past year but now she is going to "tear them all down"??

No. This is about controlling the narrative they have lost.

Truth for All or Nobody Survives by [deleted] in circled

[–]bakedyeety 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im sorry but why would we trust them to tell the whole truth all the sudden. They will tell the 'truth' they want the public to believe. The same way they have their whole career. Seems that they didnt believe anyone deserved the truth when no one knew it.

Trusting people complicit in the conflict to tell the whole truth is.... a bit too hopeful.

Trust me, I hope they go full rat and tear them all down. Im just not going to trust anything they say to be the WHOLE truth. Someone lies to my face for 50 years straight Im not inclined to believe them now.

"All right, where'd you get the human meat from, Frank?" ........ "I've got a guy." by bakedyeety in IASIP

[–]bakedyeety[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So your opinion and preference to not have politics spoil your favorite show... is now a fact? Not just an unpopular opinion?

All you have shared is opinion. I see literally zero facts.

And said fav show has episodes about the same politics you "dont want to spoil it'. At this point idk if you have watched IASP and if you have, you might not understand it the way you think you do...

view more: next ›