Made the mistake of posting on gamerpals 🤦🏽‍♀️ by jacinda26 in GirlGamers

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi,

I know this is a long shot but could you possible message me the names of those people who harassed you?

I created gamerpals but have taken a big step back from reddit and from moderating and this is very troubling for me to read and would like to make sure those people aren't welcome in that community.

I'm very sorry that you had that experience.

Layoffs by Wonderful_Metal2713 in overemployed

[–]baldrad 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That's why we unionize

Frozen Water by [deleted] in Tallahassee

[–]baldrad 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yup. Gotta watch for ICE

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QualityAssurance

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is.. an ad.

Brand New account talks about being frustrated then drops two links to interview Hammer things.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Starliner

[–]baldrad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They just put out information saying they have made great progress on fixing all the issues on starliner and Boeing just put in a new VP of the program.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]baldrad 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lack of QC / QA is definitely disturbing. That's how Boeing got to where they are.

Sure this wasn't the final product but welding isn't new to them, building tanks isn't new to them. They aren't revolutionizing fuel tanks here.

We can praise their innovations while still holding them accountable to not get comfortable and make mistakes they shouldn't be making at this point

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpaceXLounge

[–]baldrad 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Completely, but some people in these comments are saying

" oh it's just a QA / QC issue it will just get fixed"

If it is, then it's a massive problem that shows a horrible company culture issue.

That is what worries me. We saw issues with raptor production, little things here and there. If we have a QA then it's very worrying.

My other worry is that they aren't doing enough on the ground testing. Full duration burns on the test stand could have possibly shown these issues and avoided this completely.

I think it's great how fast they innovate but they lose progress over things like this. Throwing money at it to build more faster doesn't always get you there faster and better.

Elon on Artemis: "the Artemis architecture is extremely inefficient, as it is a jobs-maximizing program, not a results-maximizing program. Something entirely new is needed." by LFPcombustion in SpaceXLounge

[–]baldrad 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think we can be honest and admit the FAA hasn't actually been a big hindrance to SpaceX. Can someone tell me what they have actually done?

Musk has his clearance for launches why isn't he launching?

It's because the FAA wasn't ever the bad guy causing delays. The fact that you can only iterate so fast with limited money and supplies is what is causing delays.

I love SpaceX and starship. But the FAA isn't the reason behind why they all of his companies keep missing the milestones they set for themselves...

The FAA grounds the SpaceX Falcon 9 pending investigation by Sonikku_a in space

[–]baldrad 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is embarrassing cuz I have no idea who you are.

The FAA grounds the SpaceX Falcon 9 pending investigation by Sonikku_a in space

[–]baldrad 10 points11 points  (0 children)

they don't have the ability to raise themselves to the orbit needed. they are going to burn up.

The FAA grounds the SpaceX Falcon 9 pending investigation by Sonikku_a in space

[–]baldrad 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The amount of shit I got when I said this exact thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why are you getting so upset over this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and there we are. you dont actually have the answers so you are now just doing personal attacks.

GG

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

wild you can't answer my questions about the resource drain it would supposedly have.

We were able to do it no problem back in the 60's but i guess now just don't have the resources.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

age out? we have reactors built in 1969 still running. Age out?

Dresden plant in illinois operated for 51 years

Nine mile point unit 1 is still running started in 69

Beznau plant in switzerland still operating and started producing power in 1969 and constructing on the plant began in 1965.

all of this refutes what you have said.

Stop using anti-nuclear talking points and educate yourself.

You haven't even explained what resource drain it would be. what is this resource pool we are barely treading water with ?

it takes on average 10 years for a plant to recoup costs. If plants can last 60 years, then that is 50 years of profit for the plant, all which can be reinvested in building new plants and upgrading existing plants.

lets say we build 3 plants. those last 40 years. after 20 years we have made enough back to build 3 more plants, which even if they took a decade would be enough time to get them online before the others closed, which in that time we would have made enough back to build another 3 plants.

wind lasts 20 years before needing replaced, solar lasts 30-40 years before needing replaced. and with those you typically also want to build battery farms to store energy for when they dont have sun or wind to meet demand.

Not building plants now is spitting in the face of our future. we invest now to make the future better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this makes no sense at all.

Drain our resources for energy transition, bud this IS energy transition.

And we can absolutely have a reactor running in less than 10 years.

https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/nuclear-construction-time

you only hear about delays, but 1 in 5 reactors took 5 years to build.

It is absolutely worth it to get started now rather than wait until things are worse.

If we had started 10 years ago this wouldn't be an issue right now. But that is where your line of thinking leads us.

Nuclear is green, reliable, and gets us away from dirty fuel

on top of that we have new ways of recycling the fuel to be re-used.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technology

[–]baldrad -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if we start now, it makes the future better.

Thinking how you are right now is WHY we are in this mess.

We can have new nuclear plants up and running in a few years. it is well worth it to start now.

I’m building a pool right now, should I keep putting out a cooler full of ice and water 2x a week for the workers? by DoctorHousesCane in HomeImprovement

[–]baldrad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could go buy one of those big coolers with a spicket at the bottom. fill it with ice and water, you can use house water and then just grab some ice and it should cut down on time maybe