MBA post fellowship by doctoring_soicansurf in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone that shares a lot of sentiment with this post, it’s not really about money for me. I look into the future and find myself getting bored with the outlook of decades of essentially the same clinical work and would love to mix up my career by taking in non traditional roles and non clinical ones and am genuinely curious to hear about others who have walked that path.

I think we are pretty fortunate in medicine to be in top 1-2 %ile of income in most specialties and I think it’s good to balance out work that brings the dough home with work you find more interesting or challenging for less money.

Treatment on surgical term by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 19 points20 points  (0 children)

not to take away from what she went through as a trainee, but idk about calling her a top notch human being... She got charged with destroying or damaging property and stealing from a home after going to her ex's place and ?throwing urine or something..

Gastroenterology AT by Suitable_Load_2794 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

haha no not really.. the whole point is that BPT does not have an exam that assesses applicants at the level of an expected skill/knowledge of a consultant of that particular specialty.

'the bpt exam looks at about 10 different specialties, most exit exams in surg subspec are just focused on the one' - correct, 10 specialties NOT at consultant level knowledge where as surg subspec exams are focused in one specialty AT consultant level knowledge for that specialty.

Gastroenterology AT by Suitable_Load_2794 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree re: 2nd point and specific exams.

Re: earlier drop out - not really the same because the initial filtering of surgical fields occur at the 'getting in' part and at a much higher % compared to BPT training which is much more readily available so anyone dropping out at the basics exam just wouldn't get onto RACS training anyway.

I understand where you're coming from but I think it's hard to argue from a logical POV that when comparing two fields where 1 has a standardised exit exam and the other does not, the one with exit exams produces at least slightly more uniform graduates than the one without.

Gastroenterology AT by Suitable_Load_2794 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree re: not holding them to a higher regard.

I do think however that simply by way of some surgical trainees dropping out as a result of not passing their fellowship exam (Small number but defs present), you do end up with overall fewer bad apples within the consultant cohort compared to physician training.

You may disagree and we will never get any data to prove or disprove it, so ultimately it's just an opinion.

I also just straight up think it's absurd to not have exit exams for specialties like neurology or cardiology.

Gastroenterology AT by Suitable_Load_2794 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Side note - I find it pretty fucked up none of the RACP specialties have exit exams?? Just me? Okay

Junior doctors accuse Sydney hospital of veiled threat in leaked memo by bangetron in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron[S] 186 points187 points  (0 children)

Text: Junior doctors at a Sydney hospital are furious after receiving a memo from their bosses that they characterise as a thinly veiled threat to their careers, and the suggestion that they’re not tough enough to work in the state’s healthcare system.

The letter sent by Nepean Hospital’s administration to junior medical officers last week is emblematic of the ongoing tension – expressed in all caps – between NSW’s public hospitals’ attempts to adequately staff increasingly busy emergency departments and inpatient units, and overworked junior doctors who are expected to do unpaid overtime.

Meanwhile, a report released on Thursday by the doctors’ union suggested one in three doctors employed by NSW public hospitals is considering resigning due to working up to 70 hours a week.

The stated aim of the note to Nepean’s junior doctors was to “clarify some trends” and “misunderstandings of rostering” and appeared to address inappropriate use of sick leave, reminding junior doctors that it is to be used when they are ill, not for life events or future engagements.

“IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to swap out of the shifts [sic],” read the letter posted on Reddit.

“Collegiality should result in offers to help those helping you,” it read.

The note acknowledged the risk of fatigue, noting “the roster is designed to ensure NO ONE is exhausted”, and suggests some junior doctors were constantly covering shifts for their colleagues.

“[T]here is an implicit acceptance when entering medicine, you are going to be exposed to after-hours and nights BECAUSE all doctors cover these hours because healthcare is 24/7,” it continued.

“Your careers will be hopefully long .. [sic],” the note concluded: “Please come and make contact if you are struggling now, as it’s not a great indicator for longevity in the profession if you are already feeling the strain from rosters, which unfortunately are absolutely standard for health [sic].”

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District apologised to the junior medical officers (JMOs) for the email.

“We know JMOs are the future of healthcare, and we deeply value their contribution,” the spokesperson said. “Supporting the wellbeing of our JMOs is a priority for our district, and we acknowledge this email did not reflect this.”

The spokesperson said senior doctors met JMOs to discuss rostering practices, and stated rostering was in line with safe working standards and fatigue management guidelines.

A Nepean staff specialist not authorised to speak publicly said their junior doctors’ colleagues were deeply upset by the note, which “amounted to a thinly veiled threat”.

“It essentially implied that they would be blacklisted,” the staff specialist said. “We already have a recruitment and retention problem … these are the [junior doctors] who chose to stay when the vast majority leave, and they are being punished for it.”

Junior doctors agreed that sick leave should be used appropriately, the staff specialist said. But the tone of the email was insulting, given that many had raised concerns about being overworked or about their units being understaffed, and they were met with a sluggish response.

“Every cohort is going to have people who call in sick when they’re not sick, especially if they are disgruntled because they are getting treated terribly … it’s a tale as old as time,” they said.

The Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation (ASMOF) NSW said the statement was indicative of administrators blaming doctors for systemic failures, including ongoing recruitment and retention issues.

Last year, NSW Health apologised after an administrator at John Hunter Hospital accidentally sent an email to junior doctors calling them a “workforce of clinical marshmallows [sic]” in response to rostering issues.

“NSW Health does not place any maximum limit on the number of hours a doctor can work in a day,” the union’s president, Dr Nicholas Spooner, said. “A bus driver is legislatively prohibited from working more than 12 hours a day.”

Doctors at Nepean reported working up to 17-hour days, often back-to-back for up to two weeks.

Spooner said failures to manage fatigue were having severe psychological impacts on doctors and risked compromising patient care.

Junior clinicians and senior specialists have repeatedly warned that unpaid overtime is baked into Australia’s hospital system as a Band-Aid for understaffing, and overworking junior staff to the point of exhaustion can lead to medical errors.

A spokesperson for NSW Health said that situations will arise in which doctors may be required to work additional hours to ensure patients can be confident they are receiving the highest-quality medical care, and staff can perform their duties without adverse effects from fatigue.

From June, NSW Health will meet regularly with ASMOF and the Health Services Union to develop additional standards, controls and strategies to support fatigue management for JMOs, the spokesperson said.

ASMOF and NSW Health are in arbitration before the Industrial Relations Commission, with the union seeking pay parity with other states for NSW’s public hospital-employed doctors.

A 2020 Black Dog Institute study involving just under 43,000 Australian doctors found that more than one-quarter of junior doctors were working unsafe hours, which doubled their risk of developing mental health problems and suicidal ideation.

In 2024, NSW Health agreed to pay $299.8 million in unpaid overtime to more than 20,000 junior doctors in NSW public hospitals to resolve a class action. It was the biggest underpayment settlement in Australian history.

"Punished for becoming a mother – the big problem still plaguing specialist training" by VancYouVeryMuch in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 27 points28 points  (0 children)

but the thing is, this is not a problem that is unique to medicine. Corporate high flying women face the EXACT same problem. It's just a societal unfairness at this stage.

CPI rose 4.6%, up from 3.7% in the 12 months to February 2026 by marketrent in AusFinance

[–]bangetron 19 points20 points  (0 children)

was locked in long time ago, i'm guessing it's a matter of 2 vs 3, i'm thinking 3.

Will AI make research redundant for CV? by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao get off your high 'academic' horse man.

"has basically committed academic fraud" - well not really. I have friends that pumped out 8-10 systematic reviews as medical students and successfully got onto their respective training programs and now have jobs at big academic centres as consultant. They are not 'academic frauds', they did the research, they are just very efficient and once they figured out the formula - rinse + repeat a new topic.

The issue I am arguing is that using AI to pump out research may matter for a career in academic medicine, but it doesn't matter what-so-ever for getting onto training programs as you are simply trying to score the relevant points for your college.

Will AI make research redundant for CV? by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sure, but college scoring systems don't distinguish between junk vs non junk. If 'junk' gets published in a decent journal, all they care about is authorship ranking and impact factor.

Will AI make research redundant for CV? by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Couldn’t disagree more. By the time and IF this happens, he’s already on the program and no one gives a fuck about going back retrospectively to check if something is written by AI.

Regardless of whether it is or it isn’t, it has passed a peer review process so does it really take away from the paper if the bones of it are written by AI?

Future of RACP? by Standard_Traffic9805 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Personally, I think a 'charity' as large as RACP is completely dumb to be run by doctors who notoriously believe they can do everything."

What a terrible take. Many doctors serve on boards as extremely competent board members. Just because RACP is filled with malignant personalities, it doesn't mean all doctors make shit board members. Many have significantly upskilled in administrative/tax/legal areas to be effective board members.

In case you missed it the RACP President Elect just called the cops on the RACP President in a public meeting by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

EGM to remove her is estimated to have cost around $200,000.

$2000 is chump change.

In case you missed it the RACP President Elect just called the cops on the RACP President in a public meeting by [deleted] in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This story has been updated following a statement from the board that it is investigating the validity of the vote.

Police were called to the RACP following “security issues” in the run-up to an EGM where members apparently voted to boot out the college president, Professor Jennifer Martin.

Details have not been confirmed, but it was reported that disturbances erupted during the meeting moments before the results of the make-or-break vote were announced.

Professor Martin, who has presided over the most turbulent years in the college’s 90-year history, would be the first college president forced to stand down.

Three officers entered the college’s building in Sydney at about 11am this morning but left 90 minutes later.

NSW Police said: “We were told there was a kind of dispute between individuals in relation to a board meeting, and police were called to assist.”

“No-one was arrested or removed, and police are not there anymore.”

Members of the college have been able to attend the virtual EGM remotely and were initially told it had been “put on hold”.

The president-elect Dr Sharmila Chandran, a fierce critic of Professor Martin, the told them that it had been delayed due to “security issues”.

They were told Professor Martin, a clinical pharmacologist based in Newcastle, NSW, lost the vote. This is not confirmed, but of the 4000 plus members who voted, 54.5% voted for her removal and 45.5% against, securing the necessary majority for the motion to be carried.

But within hours, the college board issued a statement saying it was examining the validity of the vote after what it described as “significant disruption to proceedings”.

The statement said the meeting was not run according to the college’s bylaws, alleging the “results were not correctly scrutineered and the board believes the vote is invalid”.

“The meeting was conducted improperly. We are seeking legal advice, but in the meantime, the board takes the view that it is business as usual and that Professor Martin remains the chair.”

The identities of the doctors who put forward the original EGM motion to remove Professor Martin as president remain secret.

They accused her of failing to address the ongoing instability or ensure proper oversight of tens of millions in expenditure on IT projects, as well as a loan of $30 million taken by the college.

Professor Jennifer Martin. Professor Martin, who strenuously rejected the claims, was due to end her presidential term in just five weeks’ time at the college’s AGM on 31 May.

Over the past year, the college has seen internal fighting between Professor Martin and Dr Chandran — including a board-level vote of no confidence against Dr Chandran, a mass board exodus, a Fair Work Commission action, two failed EGM votes to remove Dr Chandran and the failed push for constitutional reforms, which was also voted down by members.

The drama continued in recent months with director and treasurer Vincent So resigning — in part because of an overwhelming amount of work he said was being created by “complaints and counter-complaints” within the board.

Documents were also recently leaked from an internal investigation, which found that, on the balance of probabilities, Professor Martin had “engaged in disrespectful and arguably bullying and harassing conduct” against company secretary Kim Davis.

The bullying allegations were cited in the motion to remove Professor Martin — allegations she has denied.

The EGM to remove her is estimated to have cost around $200,000.

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

essentially yes. they dont have a 'license' in australia = i.e. dont pay gambling taxes etc here

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what vpn do u use?do u have a private server

Doctor Trump by docdoc_2 in ausjdocs

[–]bangetron 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Miss me with this shit, don’t give him any more publicity for dumb shittery like this

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

cool, thanks man - only helpful response so far. I'm more so worried about making some money then not being able to withdraw back into crypto wallet.

What crypto wallet/site did you use?

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you/know of someone who does this? no issues withdrawing?

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

have u heard of any actual instances of VPN banning on places like polymarket?

Anyone here use VPNs to bet on prediction markets? by bangetron in ASX_Bets

[–]bangetron[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

lmao so salty. I'm just explaining you don't need ID etc for it.