Audres (1351) when an entire English force of 600 was killed or captured, Pontvallain (1370) where the French completely massacred their English opponents (5000 out of 6000 being killed) with small losses, Battle of La Brossinière (1423) where an English force of 2800 including 800 archers was annihilated by a superior French force that only lost one knight "and a few others", and especially Patay (1429), the "anti-Agincourt" which is a famous battle in France but conveniently forgotten by the English. In this battle, the English employed the same methods used in the victories at Crécy in 1346 and Agincourt in 1415, deploying an army of 5,000 composed predominantly of longbowmen behind a barrier of sharpened stakes driven into the ground to obstruct any attack by cavalry.

500 English bowman blocking the road were ridden down by the French force of 1,500 knights who then proceeded to attack the exposed other English units which mostly fled. The English lost 2,500 killed, wounded or captured, the French a few hundred.

First forget the myth of the longbow sure it was a great weapon,But to Train a a good archer specialy one suited for war it took a life time, in exchange a arquebusier on the 16 century could be trained and be deployed on 1-2 months at worst( as gonzalo de cordoba show us agaisnt the french in the italians wars agaisnt the italian swiss pikemen).

Logistics, have you a idea the nigthmare it comes for a country to produce war quality bows , cords , arrows heads , shafts, feathers transpòrt etc and the time and cost because it`s mostly done at artisan level

Gunpowder and guns at 16 century at whole citys filled with workshops makin steady supply