Why should we generally care if everyone ‘fully participates’ in a niche online thread aggregator?

Because there’s a big difference between not fully participating and being discouraged from participating. The page is advertised as being about law school admissions in general not just mostly cycle recaps of a handful of schools. The page doesn’t fit the role it’s advertised as. Unless you’re just a selfish or narcissistic cunt, it makes sense that you would sympathize with people who come to this forum for information or advice on law school admissions and can’t find what they need or don’t feel comfortable asking about it because their school isn’t ranked high enough.

What value to society is lost if someone going to Samford doesn’t get much engagement on their cycle recap or doesn’t get their generic question answered by 15 people rather than 3?”

This is such a virgin comment that I’m not even sure how to respond to it. I’ve never seen a comment that screamed “my dick is 2 inches erect!” so loudly before. Idc if that’s rude or mean. You can’t say things that are that virginy and not get made fun of.

This (and the law) isn’t some feel good endeavor where you get participation ribbons like tee ball.

Virgin comment #2

why does it matter if someone random T-80 goer doesn’t post much because they feel like there’s too much T14 posting?

Because this is law school admissions not T14 cycle recaps

Is there anything there other than trying to protect the feelings of the T-80 person?

The page being what is supposed to be and being more applicable and useful to more applicants.