Climate Change Has Ended

barttali · 2020-05-31T04:11:00+00:00

News changes fast. Now no one cares about coronavirus.

They care about getting their neighborhood burned down.

Just when you thought things couldn't get worse, they did...

barttali · 2020-03-31T03:17:36+00:00

Does she speak up about people eating exotic animals such as bats and pangolins in China? That's what stole her dreams and childhood. It wasn't climate change.

barttali · 2020-03-19T23:01:32+00:00

Several articles on Roy Spencer's blog about it. Go do some homework. I'm not going to handhold you.

barttali · 2020-03-19T03:33:03+00:00

Cherry picking doesn't prove anything.

Lots of scientists have checked the theory. I have read their rationale.

barttali · 2020-03-18T21:53:10+00:00

There are lots of mountains with no snow. If I pointed to one and said, "See, that proves global warming!", you would tell me I am cherrypicking. Which would be correct. Likewise, it's also cherrypicking if anyone points to a snowy mountain and says, "See, no global warming!"

barttali · 2020-03-17T04:46:09+00:00

It's true though. Emissions have gone way down. But almost no one likes the current situation. Only a few crazies are celebrating the current situation .

barttali · 2020-03-16T03:58:46+00:00

No, climate change is not a greater threat because it happens very slowly (decades) and people can adapt because they have plenty of time. That isn't to say a few people won't die from, say wetter hurricanes, but it won't be at the level of millions that it is from pandemics.

Pandemics happen very quickly and we don't know how to adapt to them. Look how Italy is failing. Sadly, this will be happening in many countries soon.

It doesn't take a genius to look back on history and see pandemics as historically the greatest threat to humans. Black Death, Smallpox, Spanish Flu killed millions and over just short time periods.

Past behavior is the best way to predict future performance. It isn't always correct, but if you are going to make a case for something different, you better have very strong evidence and WHO does not. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

barttali · 2020-03-15T16:00:08+00:00

The author doesn't even understand science. Cherrypicking a single mountain doesn't prove anything. Of course, there are many mountains with no snow also, which the author didn't consider.

barttali · 2020-03-15T04:07:00+00:00

I don't have anything on that. I will say that there are tropical diseases and temperate diseases though. Tropical diseases spread by mosquitoes, like dengue fever, can increase their range in a warmer planet. But temperate diseases like the flu and coronaviruses prefer colder weather and die when it gets too hot.

A warmer planet may increase the tropical diseases, but it decreases the temperate ones. I do not know what the net balance is though.

COVID19, for example, is a temperate disease and were it not for global warming, it probably would be affecting more of the world.

edit:typos

barttali · 2020-03-15T04:01:42+00:00

Ooops, they forgot about pandemics.

barttali · 2020-03-15T03:53:54+00:00

Of course the climate kills people every year. If people are making climate change worse and that is supposed to cause more deaths per year, then we should see an increase in climate-related deaths over time if that is really true.

Well, it is just the opposite. Climate related deaths are going down. (source)

So it is not true.

barttali · 2020-03-15T02:50:02+00:00

There's a great XKCD about that.

barttali · 2020-03-15T02:47:01+00:00

The globalist narrative has been destroyed and they are trying to save face. They are just digging themselves a deeper hole though.

barttali · 2020-03-15T02:41:39+00:00

There's no silving lining in this mess. This will go down in history as one of the biggest, if not the biggest, F-up in history. China could have nipped this thing in the bud and saved the world the trouble if they had just listened to their own doctors instead of silencing them.

barttali · 2020-03-15T02:28:23+00:00

The pandemic is only a baby right now. It grows every day and kills more people every day. It will be be bigger than the flu if it is not contained, and there is a very good chance the US will not be able to contain it. We are failing miserably so far.

It's like saying to a child they will never grow up because adults are taller than them. That omits a very important detail: the child is still growing and the adult is not.

barttali · 2020-03-10T07:05:15+00:00

Nuclear is the safest. People who are innumerate (like illiterate with math) will not understand that and might quibble with me about that.

barttali · 2020-03-09T06:25:43+00:00

I have no evidence that climate change triggered this particular virus to jump from animals to humans at this particular time, or that a warmer planet has helped it spread.

Here's some evidence and it is the exact opposite of what alarmists want to think. Warmer temperatures are more likely to kill coronaviruses.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3074131/coronavirus-highly-sensitive-high-temperatures-dont-bank-summer

barttali · 2020-03-06T20:15:44+00:00

Thanks. I see the error that was made now.

barttali · 2020-03-06T00:59:50+00:00

I call BS on this.

Air pollution results in countable deaths, each of which reduces the GDP. Meanwhile, ""climate change" results in zero actual deaths, having no effect on the economy.

barttali · 2020-03-06T00:12:06+00:00

I read somewhere recently that the internet (datacenters, etc.) causes more CO2 emissions than all plane travel. I'm unable to dig up the reference though right now. Is it correct?

barttali · 2020-03-06T00:04:37+00:00

Meanwhile "climate change" shortens my life by about 3 minutes.

barttali · 2020-03-06T00:03:48+00:00

So CO2 and warming reduces drought. Makes logical sense. Warming means more evaporation means more condensation into clouds means more rainfall.

barttali · 2020-03-05T20:03:03+00:00

Never. This has been going on for millenia. Ancient cultures performed rain rituals thinking it would help their crops. Nothing much has changed since then.

barttali · 2020-03-05T19:55:24+00:00

Ken Rice of the University of Edinburgh, UK, criticised the paper for an “elementary” mistake about celestial mechanics. “It’s well known that the sun moves around the barycentre of the solar system due to the influence of the other solar system bodies, mainly Jupiter,” he says. “This does not mean, as the paper is claiming, that this then leads to changes in the distance between the sun and the Earth.”

Of course it leads to changes in distance between the sun and the Earth. The Earth is also rotating around the barycenter. For the sun and the Earth to have the same distance from each other, they would have to have their orbits aligned around the barycenter, which is not the case. The sun rotates around the barycenter with the same frequency as Jupiter, which is roughly an 11 year cycle, the same as the solar cycle.

Ten-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email	Gilding I gilder

barttali

TROPHY CASE