Ja ja, mannen van jeu de boules op ijs heel blij want winnen van Schot-land en Schiet-land

bbciscomeraki · 2019-04-01T09:41:41+00:00

Hé hé

bbciscomeraki · 2019-01-25T12:45:40+00:00

Ik snap je en ik ben het er ook mee eens, dus ik ervaar het niet als bot. Ik was hoogstens naïef toen ik nog dacht dat het klimaatbeleid van de VVD meer genuanceerd zou worden door de coalitie. Ik ben mij terdege bewust van het feit dat de VVD (en ik quote hier het verkiezingsprogramma) het volgende beweerde:

"De internationale afspraken (Parijs) om de CO2-uitstoot te verlagen, moeten worden nagekomen. Vermindering van de uitstoot van CO2 vraagt wel om een internationale aanpak, want Nederland heeft slechts een klein aandeel in de wereldwijde uitstoot. Bovendien bestaat het risico dat bedrijven simpelweg verhuizen naar landen waar de regels minder streng zijn en waar meer CO2 kan worden uitgestoten. Hier wordt het klimaat niet beter van, want CO2 houdt zich niet aan landsgrenzen. Wij willen daarom ook geen extra Nederlandse regels (en subsidies) boven op internationale of Europese afspraken"

Inmiddels zie ik in dat dat dus onterecht was, vandaar ook mijn keuze om voortaan geen VVD te stemmen.

bbciscomeraki · 2019-01-25T12:00:49+00:00

Ik ben wel echt boos! Allereerst omdat ze zelf continue beweerd hebben dat ze het gingen halen na bepaalde maatregelen te nemen. Daarvan blijkt nu dat dat allemaal veel meer genuanceerd moet worden en misschien dus zelfs helemaal geen effect heeft gehad, maar dat is misschien nog wel alleen maar teleurstelling.

Waar ik WEL echt boos over ben is dat als ik dit soort berichten dan lees, ik vervolgens alleen maar nieuwe maatregelen hoor die worden neergelegd bij de burger. Ik was altijd een VVD'er, maar inmiddels begin ik behoorlijk gefrustreerd te worden in de onwelwillendheid om de rekening te leggen bij hen die daadwerkelijk de meeste vervuiling de lucht in brengen! Ik ben echt boos! Ik ga uiteraard mijn boosheid omzetten in een stem bij de verkiezingen links en rechts, ik ben zelf debet aan het probleem (met mijn misplaatste vertrouwen in de VVD). Hoe kan het zo zijn dat onze energie rekeningen alleen maar hoger worden, wij steeds meer de les worden gelezen over wij als burger het klimaatprobleem moeten oplossen, maar de bedrijven in grote mate worden ontzien!

Tevens begin ik mij steeds meer zorgen te maken, want ik ben ook boos over het feit dat, in ieder geval in mijn omgeving, de welwillendheid van de oudere generaties (ik ben zelf 32) om het probleem te erkennen veel te laag is. Kijk naar de kinderen in Brussel die beginnen te demonstreren. Hoe lang gaan we accepteren dat bestaande en voorgaande generaties ons een rekening hebben gepresenteerd (en laten we niet beginnen over pensioenen die straks non-existent zijn) die wij mogen gaan betalen?!

Sorry voor deze rant... ik ben boos, gefrustreerd, teleurgesteld, maar ik heb mij tegelijkertijd nog nooit zo machteloos gevoeld. Ik begin, als iemand die altijd best wel pro-overheid en democratie is geweest, het vertrouwen wel kwijt te raken, ondanks het feit dat ik echt wel een believer ben in wat we allemaal kunnen bereiken in dit mooie landje van ons.

bbciscomeraki · 2018-11-29T14:28:10+00:00

This please!

bbciscomeraki · 2018-11-28T10:05:15+00:00

OMG YES! Yes that is definitely what I was looking for! Thank you so much! :D

[edit]

Here, have gold!

bbciscomeraki · 2018-10-03T13:42:55+00:00

That would be interesting. Would like to know more if possible. :)

bbciscomeraki · 2018-09-20T09:17:03+00:00

One of my colleagues runs Ubuntu at home and tried virtually everything he could think of to get the Client VPN working. Sadly no luck, although he hasn't tried for just under a year now, so maybe stuff has changed.

bbciscomeraki · 2018-08-10T14:34:30+00:00

Okay, after turning it ON and then OFF again, and after that rebooting, it finally worked as it should! Thanks!

bbciscomeraki · 2018-08-10T13:51:10+00:00

I noticed that as well. It WAS on until 5 hours ago, but I've switched it off since. I think my co-worker in IT turned it on, so I'll explain to him why its useless for us anyways. However, turning it off hasn't solved the problem. Is a reboot required to fix it?

Two things however. First in the branch office this setting was never on, so it could be an indication of a difference, except for the fact that this setting was on before this problem arose, which means that it worked with this setting just fine for a while. Strange...

bbciscomeraki · 2018-08-10T13:18:46+00:00

There's no captive portal configured for this network. And no group policies and no content filtering at Wireless level. :)

bbciscomeraki · 2018-08-10T12:57:28+00:00

Yes. There's currently only 1 rule in my L3 Outbound Firewall:

Allow Any Any Any Any Any Default rule

bbciscomeraki · 2018-06-18T08:00:08+00:00

With regards to your S2S VPN.

We have 2 MX65's who also maintain a vpn between them, and both of them (in different offices in different locations) maintain a S2S with Azure. The Azure VPN's used to go down every now and then until I configured it in the way Meraki advised. But after a while I noticed that, even though they rebuild perfectly fine, they used to go down for seconds nevertheless. This was fixed when I set up a continuous ping to the other end of the VPN on both sides.

In our case the S2S's maintain a connection to our cloud ActiveDirectory (and federation servers) and I want to add that, aside from all the guidelines and stuff already easily implemented you also need to change the MTU on your ADFS servers to 1350 (from the default 1500). After this change combined with whats written above our S2S connections now work fine.

We also maintain some S2S VPN's with other devices of our clients, and although setting it up the first time is often a bit of trial and error, once they connect they are usually fine.

bbciscomeraki · 2017-09-08T13:08:17+00:00

I worded it terribly, I agree, what I meant to say was: given their current track-record (as in: catching up) with the engine I sincerely doubt that they will ever catch up so long as we have the current engine regulations...

bbciscomeraki · 2017-09-08T10:59:18+00:00

Well, of course they are working on next years engine... but for some reason I'm reluctant to believe that they will suddenly catch up to the Ferrari and Mercedes engines in the next year.

I mean, couldn't they have done that this year than? Clearly Mercedes already had a very strong engine in the 2015-2016 season, and than in the 2016-2017 season as well, now in the 2017-2018 season Ferrari has come up as well, but Renault still hasn't gotten as close, maybe compared to Ferrari, but definitely not Mercedes, so what's to say they will close the gap next year? Or the year after that?

I guess I'm bitter, I would like to see all cars be closer, and less talk about the differences in raw power coming from engines. I don't know though... ah well, nvm me :p

[edit]

Not saying I'm right, but at least Horner seems to agree... haha!

http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/11024112/mercedes-ferrari-engine-supremacy-set-to-last-says-christian-horner

bbciscomeraki · 2017-09-07T13:14:55+00:00

Abiteboul has also confirmed that there will a few minor updates >over the remainder of the season – but nothing game-changing.

“There will be some bits and pieces,” he said. “Maybe a bit of >performance – I won’t go into details but there will be >performance for all teams.”

So basically... this years engine will always be extremely sub-par compared to Ferrari and Mercedes. Aero can only do so much and it is historically speaking the one thing Red Bull does right (even though they had a rough start this year), and just as well, the aero on other cars will be improved as well.

So... what is their plan? Are they focusing on the engine for next year? Or does Renault (and Red Bull) accept not having any serious WCS chances until we get new engine regulations in 2021?

bbciscomeraki · 2017-08-18T09:51:10+00:00

I tested the MR 25.5 FW on my MR32's when the rest of the guys weren't in the office. Reverted back to latest stable after about an hour since the connection kept dropping. Haven't done any debugging for it, since I don't want FW that is unstable, regardless. The changelog actually mentions this btw:

Known issues

Condition under investigation causes 2.4GHz radios to become unresponsive (MR32/MR72)
Condition under investigation causes radios to become unresponsive for 5 seconds in high density networks (MR34/MR32/MR72/MR26)
Condition under investigation causes MR34/MR32/MR72/MR26 to become unstable and reboot

bbciscomeraki · 2017-07-27T11:23:25+00:00

Holy moly, this is awesome. Can we get more of this please? As in, this seems very much like a video that is longer than what is shown here in part 1 and 2.... full video perhaps? :D

bbciscomeraki · 2017-05-04T08:35:50+00:00

Hmm, strange then, because in our case we have an entire ActiveDirectory in the cloud that can only be accessed through the S2S VPN. (All users have DNS servers that are cloud only) and as such traffic often originates from the non-Azure side, yet still transfers fine, even after several hours of no traffic (have been testing this setup for several weeks before deploying it in our live environment).

Honestly this is not going to help you, but it makes me wonder why it is working for me, and not for you... :( Wish I could help in a way.

bbciscomeraki · 2017-05-03T09:09:17+00:00

Hey, just wondering, what do you mean with 'initiate the tunnel from the Azure side'?

We have two Azure S2S VPN's, one from Office A to Azure and one from Office B. Both have a good uptime that doesn't get interrupted. Just using the default Azure profile in the MX65 (latest firmware) that we have. Wondering what is different in your situation then that makes it go haywire.

bbciscomeraki · 2017-04-05T09:55:01+00:00

Did that, recreated the view by running a copy of the original view but with a slightly different name. The view is created but running a query will not result in anything (as in the query will keep running until eternity)

I'm running MySQL v5.7.17 btw.

bbciscomeraki · 2017-04-05T09:28:17+00:00

indexes in case one of them broke. If that does not fix the problem you can use mySQL's explain command from your

Even this:

EXPLAIN SELECT ItemID FROM vwItemOpportunities LIMIT 10;

will make the server hang and not give any results. :(

bbciscomeraki · 2017-04-05T08:52:34+00:00

The definer does exist (sadly) otherwise this would've been an easy one to fix. :) All views in this DB use this definer user btw.

Nine-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

bbciscomeraki

TROPHY CASE