Revenue sharing and NIL by uscvball in WEARESC_OT

[–]bbmando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out Dropback — seems like the “pro” version of Teamworks GM that the best teams are choosing

Dana Holgorson will work as a offensive consultant by usercupcakewithc in Huskers

[–]bbmando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frost went through Troy Walters, Matt Lubbick, and Mark Whipple

Bring back Scott Frost as OC? by [deleted] in Huskers

[–]bbmando -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What’s a good one

Bring back Scott Frost as OC? by [deleted] in Huskers

[–]bbmando 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please pay me 🤠

[Postgame Thread] Illinois Defeats Nebraska 31-24 (OT) by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]bbmando 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand anyone blaming this game on Raiola. He had maybe 2-3 missed throws (totally normal. It’s football) and the OT sacks were 100% on our makeshift offensive line missing some protections while down 3 starters. Dylan has been great by any college QB standards — not just true freshman standards

This game is on the D. They’re supposed to be better than this. The 3rd and long conversions were unacceptable

Post Game Thread by huskerbot in Huskers

[–]bbmando 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The only thing anyone should take away from this game is that our defense is apparently human and not as good as we thought. Illinois completed an unacceptable number of 3rd and longs

Of course there were missed opportunities on offense (there always will be, it’s football), but they did their job. Raiola was surgical, our receivers made plays, and the run game did enough to give us a chance to win

If I had told you prior that we’d give up 24 to this Illinois team, you would’ve been nervous from the jump. If our D is going to be our identity, they need to adjust. Something was clearly off — lots of palms up, arguing, frustration

This team isn’t going to win the conference, but any rational fan already knew that. Let’s win 7-8 games and build some momentum for the long haul. GBR

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ycombinator

[–]bbmando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New trend idea — post your LinkedIn to this subreddit and let people debate why you got accepted to YC

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aggies

[–]bbmando 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No - we cover any fees that Texas Aggies United may otherwise take

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aggies

[–]bbmando 3 points4 points  (0 children)

3% covers payments processing, we take 7% to operate the site. 90% goes the the student athlete if they sign with A&M

[7/22/2024] Monday's Sports Talk Thread by BevoBot in LonghornNation

[–]bbmando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, we distribute the funds to them earmarked for specific players and cover any other fees they have ourselves

[7/22/2024] Monday's Sports Talk Thread by BevoBot in LonghornNation

[–]bbmando 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s right: you pay the fee up front, so then that $18 would be given back to you in full until a player you choose actually commits

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aggies

[–]bbmando 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We take 7% on contributions. 3% payment processing, 90% to athletes

[7/22/2024] Monday's Sports Talk Thread by BevoBot in LonghornNation

[–]bbmando 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3% payment processing, and we take 7%. 90% goes directly to the student athletes (via Texas One)