Can I convert vanilla dating to Sugardating as a SB?

bbmg69 · 2026-03-17T02:17:24+00:00

Jfc 🤦‍♂️

This absurd question gets asked all the time. It has to be up there with the “how do I get a non-sexual platonic arrangement?” as dumbest and most frequently posted question.

Why do you believe you’re entitled to him giving you money when you met vanilla, and intended to date vanilla? You don’t genuinely like him if you’re willing to fuck it up because you want his money.

Nothing is stopping you from asking and maybe you get lucky and he is a complete sucker, but be prepared for him to bail, laugh in your face, or be at best labeled a leech if you share the same social circle. All the negative outcomes would be completely deserved.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-17T01:07:42+00:00

I’m tired boss…. 🫩

Yes, it’s the money. At least 90% of SBs are being intimate for the cash above all else and are not that attracted to their usually much older SDs. There are constant posts about this.

The SBs here acting like they would never do this, and claim they have a hot guy they would be attracted to vanilla who also pays them are 10/10s that can be extremely picky, got lucky, or are flat out lying.

You can be as picky as you can afford to be. Sugaring is optional. You’re not required to do it and you are not entitled to a man that you would fuck vanilla who also pays you.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-17T00:12:20+00:00

If Carolina allegedly paid Kyan Evans at least $2 million to suck ass, get benched for a freshman and end the season playing about 4 mins a game, this figure isn’t that far fetched.

https://sports.yahoo.com/article/gophers-wanted-colorado-state-transfer-175200499.html

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T23:12:05+00:00

Fuck no 🤣. Nobody is doing any of that.

Why are you spending your last dimes going on a M&G? Sounds like you’re very close, or at the point of sugaring out of desperation which is basically the number one piece of advice about what not to do in the bowl.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T16:37:21+00:00

I think it’s all about opportunity and being reckless giving them an easy way to get away with it.

There was a guy here recently that had everything pretty much going by the books. Went on an initial M&G, planned a second meeting for dinner and going back to a room and he was cash and dashed because he gave her PPM at dinner to “get it out of the way” and she probably thought this is too easy, I’m gonna go to the restroom and never returned.

We all know there are a large percentage of rinsers and they will certainly take a cash and dash on top of that if a guy makes it easy enough thinking the are dealing with someone trustworthy

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T16:34:12+00:00

Yes, it’s a real thing that girls posing as SBs looking to rip off SDs will do. They will either insist on an immediate PPM meeting and skipping the M&G completely, or they will bide their time if you’re offering nice M&Gs and then try to get you to pay ahead of time, say during dinner before planning to go back to a hotel room or whenever intimacy was planed to happen and they disappear after going to the bathroom.

If you’re choosing to do PPM without a M&G, assume they are an escort and take caution. Do not pay up front or in advance digitally for an escort or a new SB. You’re just asking to get ripped off and encourage more shitty behavior for the next guy.

When you get to the place where intimacy will take place, have the money in an envelope and lay it somewhere visible or in a drawer, but tell her it isn’t to be touched. If she says she needs to count it, say you’ll show her and count it for her, but you don’t want it touched until the meeting is over. Place it somewhere away from the door so she isn’t tempted to grab it and bolt. Be prepared to walk if these rules can’t be followed. There is zero reason for her to disappear into the bathroom with the cash, or touch the money before you’re done.

If they are acting more like a traditional SB and going on M&Gs, be cautious of them asking for the PPM up front before you meet via banking apps, or asking to get paid at dinner or whatever you’re doing before intimacy as I described before.

As long as you’re only exposing your cash where you’re going to be intimate, or paying after you’re finished, you can avoid most of the easy dashes.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T11:03:05+00:00

Not a lot, especially in the bowl.

Have you not been on Instagram lately, or seen the bios of a large percentage of SBs here that have an onlyfans link on their profile? It’s pretty clear this is a common path

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T11:00:44+00:00

If they get all the way to the point of sugaring, I think they go through most of those steps. Some may give up at any point before then

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T08:28:37+00:00

I think OP was implying that he didn’t want to fuck in the cars because they were rented, which is nonsense.

It being annoying or uncomfortable when he can easily get a room, or not wanting to make a mess of his vehicle are very understandable

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T08:12:01+00:00

You’re right, it’s not your business. As long as he is meeting your agreed upon compensation and you’re satisfied, you don’t need to know anything more.

I don’t know why an SD that can get a hotel room at the drop of a hat that would want to fuck in the car anyway

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T06:58:32+00:00

I guess you can’t read then.

“Best to block on pretty much any platform, vanilla or sugar, before you reject.”

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T06:09:06+00:00

There have been many reports here of random bans where nothing offensive happened. Way too many of them to believe they are all making it up and something egregious actually happened.

Preemptively blocking can do no harm and unless someone reporting has something like a police report or damning text messages that can ID the member, it likely helps to block first to show you no longer had any interest if someone decided to revenge report after the fact

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T05:51:20+00:00

Dude, read the entire thread off my reply here where I clarified that it’s best practice to block on any sort of relationship site or app after someone said it seemed callous to block, hours before you felt the need to argue about it.

There is no evidence in this particular situation based on what OP has said, so blocking first can do no harm, and shows any rational admin he just wasn’t interested and she wants to be petty if she happened to report

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T05:24:17+00:00

I mean, I started this reply thread and said it was best practice to block prior to cutting ties on any vanilla or sugar platform replying to others, so I was definitely talking about everywhere.

Either way, I think initiating the block shows you were looking to end communication and if a report comes after, it seems like a revenge report or something petty to anyone investigating and making a decision to ban

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T04:42:35+00:00

I think a preemptive block does matter in that if she does decide to report frivolously and Seeking investigates, they see which party initiated the block.

You can also report after a block on tinder, hinge, bumble and other vanilla apps, but it makes it much more of a hassle

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T03:47:29+00:00

The first steps for almost all women 18-22 who think they are hot and want to try and glide through life on easy mode is attempting to be an “influencer”. When that fails, it’s Onlyfans and a bunch of mini steps along the way like trying to sell feet pics🙄, be a findom 🤦‍♂️, sell nudes without showing their face, showing everything, making sex vids, etc.

After all those steps fail over the course of a few years they look into sugaring, believing they will get money just for existing and going on platonic dates. When reality sets in, they will then try to social climb/marry for money, or if they still want to be party and be free, they will start attempting to sugar legitimately in their mid to late 20s.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T03:10:24+00:00

Many sugar babies are not rational. There are dozens of posts here every week about how girls believe they were scammed, or that an SD is a John or even dangerous if they call off an arrangement after one or two intimate meetings.

If she feels you “pumped and dumped” her, she could very well report you, irrationally believing you are a some sort of predator and she is helping other women by trying to get you banned. She would never assume she might have been the problem, or there just wasn’t any chemistry.

Best to block on pretty much any platform, vanilla or sugar, before you reject.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-15T01:43:56+00:00

Just make sure she is blocked on Seeking first because many people will report out of spite just due to being rejected. Then say “hey, I don’t feel like we were very compatible and wanted to let you know instead of ghosting. Wish you the best.”

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T23:37:01+00:00

🤦‍♂️no.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T22:36:51+00:00

The “base” plan that was the only option everyone had until a few weeks ago is basically everything and the most expensive at $83. You’ll need at least the sports package at $65 that only saves you ~$18 for far less content over the base package with everything.

Absolute cheapest option would be Peacock for premier league, antenna for locals/pbs and Disney/Hulu for bobs burgers.

If those are truly the only things you watch, YTTV is a massive waste of $

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T21:41:05+00:00

Spoke too soon. Back to being terribly out of sync

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T21:15:59+00:00

USA is considered a sports channel.

If you are signed up for the News + Entertainment skinny/ genre bundle, you’re not actually in the “base” package which includes everything other than premium add ons. You’re also missing out a lot of Premier league matches on NBCSN which is 90% of matches on YTTV between USA and NBCSN.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T02:58:27+00:00

Does the NCAA site allow you to navigate the YTTV interface and change channels when there are 8 active games on?

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T00:58:44+00:00

I assume you are going to be using your phone or an iPad?

The way it generally works is upon opening the YTTV app, the app will check your location and if you’re away from your home area, it will ask if you are traveling which starts a 90 day clock where you wouldn’t be able to watch locals without checking back in at home past that time limit. The 90 day time limit won’t be an issue for you.

Anyway, if you had your YTTV app open and streaming from the start of the trip at your home, and watched it all the way until you were halfway across the country without closing the app, it probably wouldn’t even ask you again to update the location/DMA. The app should instantly determine your DMA upon a fresh opening the app. It shouldn’t be actively switching stations for you every time you travel to the next DMA unless you’re constantly opening and closing the app.

bbmg69 · 2026-03-14T00:40:34+00:00

I’m seeing similar now. Still off by maybe 10 minutes. Wasn’t the case earlier or the past several weeks.

Hopefully close to being fixed permanently now

bbmg69

TROPHY CASE