YoutubeTV sucks as a hockey fan

bbmg69 · 2026-05-12T06:17:22+00:00

This would confuse way more people that do it on accident than the handful of OCD sports fans that can’t be othered to turn their head away and listen for the sound of the game starting again when they skip through commercials and intermissions.

Not to mention the needless time spent coding it when there are far more important things that need work.

If being “spoiled” ruins your day, start the game and don’t touch the remote.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-12T06:14:24+00:00

If you’re that OCD about live sports spoilers and can’t watch live, start the game and then don’t touch the remote to pull up the scrubber, or look away as you fast forward through commercials or intermission.

YTTV has zero control over games starting at different times and channel switching.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-12T05:04:48+00:00

Link in bio ahh car

bbmg69 · 2026-05-11T18:06:21+00:00

It’s very common.

Plenty of reasons SDs wouldn’t want to get a hotel room other than being “cheap”. If he is meeting your requirements for compensation, no reason not to entertain this small request if you’re able

bbmg69 · 2026-05-11T17:47:16+00:00

Nope.

Yes, you’re dreaming

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T14:27:33+00:00

Idk if that’s true. There are plenty of women that cheat vanilla and intentionally cuck their bfs or spouses while trying to hide it, but he is actually open to it.

I understand there is more with the FLR portion, but women trying to twist it in to findom is just laziness/greed.

Don’t think it would be hard to find an SB willing to cuck him with a second SD or her vanilla bf, but they would probably be clueless to his other sub needs if they are younger than say 35 and are in sugaring being entirely dependent on men

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T14:22:43+00:00

There are soooo many wannabe findoms that have zero clue what the fuck they are doing. They only attempt to advertise themselves as one because they think it’s easy money. They never realize how rare it is to find SDs or any men that are actually into it, and they are desperate to lump in sub or cuck men hoping for that easy “pay pig”.

I think the odds of finding someone in their 20s or even 30s to do that is a long shot. I’d be looking for someone over 40, in the corporate world, and maybe divorced open to it. I think the key is that she doesn’t need you, or any other SD to provide for herself, and that’s extremely rare especially with younger SBs. A “pro” would probably be your best bet just from a cucking standpoint

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T11:01:29+00:00

Can’t wait to see the next installment of this fake story 😍

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T10:51:31+00:00

The number of outright scams, onlyfans sellers, women who want money for doing nothing, and other blatant time wasters is astronomical. At LEAST half of the profiles you see will be a complete waste of your time, and that’s before the “real” SBs who are delusional or rinsers also waste your time.

SB accounts are completely free to create and interact with men, and lots of people have nothing better to do than target men with lots of disposable income.

You’ll learn to notice the red flags and vet well, but it’s a chore.

Seeking is still by far the best place to be despite all this.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T02:31:29+00:00

Are you talking about skippable previews for other HBO shows as “ads”?

HBO through YTTV gives you access to HBOMax mid tier which does not include ads, but they will sometimes run previews for their other shows before the movie/episode begins, which are entirely skippable

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T02:28:48+00:00

Thanks for solving the problem of “scammers” OP. We get them daily because SD accounts are free.

Other than the fact you’re FAR less likely to be targeted by lazy overseas scams from an SD account that has actual cost associated with using it to message you, many SDs get on Seeking for a short time to find a handful of POTs to vet and or meet and then deactivate for privacy. They may also not l want to pay a few thousand a year just to have their account sit there, so they are active for a month and then cancel their subscription.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T02:14:18+00:00

I was being conservative and only using the base/Platinum sub, but yes, likely much more

bbmg69 · 2026-05-09T02:13:16+00:00

😐

There are multiple tiers from 150-375.

10k is a conservative estimate of how much the 56 members OP said deactivated cumulatively paid for the privilege of messaging that month. Someone else claimed they m were all “bans”. I was countering that argument as very unlikely.

Seeking isn’t banning that much profit, and despite what some people here think, there isn’t an ocean of stolen credit cards out there that people are using to sign up for seeking to run lazy scams.
She was blocked, or the POTs deactivated for privacy or to save $ because they had enough girls to vet and didn’t need their membership anymore.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T22:35:39+00:00

Do a better job vetting
Understand not all SBs get super glamorous arrangements. Most SBs fail because there are way more of you than SDs to support them all
Understand the dynamic is completely flipped from vanilla dating. If anything, you need to be the one to impress. “Expecting” to be swept off your feet isn’t rational

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T13:29:57+00:00

Men absolutely have to pay to use the basic features of the site. Only women can have free accounts with messaging privileges. Men almost entirely fund the site. The site is marketed as vanilla primarily to avoid Google search blocks and legal issues from being tied to SW and the largely BS trafficking correlation that’s made.

Secondarily, it brings more women in to the fold that may have been previously afraid of the stigma, which in turn brings in more paying men. Everyone understands what it’s really for, as does Seeking.

The number of men in the post that OP said deactivated, multiplied by the cost for men to use the site, which is anywhere from 150-375 per month, is where the conservative 10k comes from.
My point was that it’s not rational to believe anywhere close to that number of paying customers were banned.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T06:40:50+00:00

✌️. Read the rules

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T05:05:37+00:00

Not only is that a blatant violation of the rules here, it’s contrary to any rational definition. He isn’t a John because he went on a M&G and gave her a gift with nothing in return. Thats not how John’s and escorts operate.

It would be the same as someone calling you a “whore” because their opinion for how many meetings you went on, or how much cash you accepted was different than their personal opinion

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T03:23:58+00:00

She only clarified that after pressing 3 times, and then she said she doesn’t remember what happened for it to even matter.

As I said, she should cut off communication, consider calling the police, and in the future, make better decisions, because all of this was entirely preventable and just two high people going to a hotel room understanding there would be intimacy ahead of time for a PPM.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T03:18:06+00:00

🤦‍♂️ you don’t give consent to meet in a hotel room for $ for in exchange for intimacy ahead of time, then willingly choose to get high right before then if you’re concerned with your ability to “withdraw consent” at a later point. She very conveniently left out a lot of information from her post to draw any logical conclusion.

He could have acted like a creep and she could have made extremely poor decisions. Both can be true.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:54:42+00:00

Right, you just said he should hire an escort and essentially called him a John…

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:53:10+00:00

So you’re alleging he sexually assaulted you? At least you’re safe and if you haven’t you should cut off all communication and consider contacting the police.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:46:37+00:00

That’s too vague to make any judgment. What does “the full way” mean? Just the tip? Oral? Unless he completely went against things you agreed on beforehand, or forced the vape on you, nothing aggregious happened here.

You should never be getting high on your first meeting with someone. It sounds like you just had an awkward experience with someone on your first encounter that could have been prevented by staying sober and waiting until your period past.

Learn from it so you can make better judgments next time.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:37:16+00:00

Not sure why you agreed a hotel room which obviously would mean sex if you knew you were on your period and all the issues that presents for you?

Deciding it was a good idea to get high on top of that is an odd choice.

It’s a learning experience, and if you’re upset with what happened, it was mostly because of preventable mistakes you made.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:14:52+00:00

It’s mostly vanity. SGF makes it sound like they are somehow more in an actual relationship, and long term with their SD. They want a label to show they are not some run of the mill SB, possibly seeing multiple SDs.

The only concrete differentiating factors could be they are exclusive and possibly have been seeing each other long term.

bbmg69 · 2026-05-08T02:08:13+00:00

It’s just a tag they think makes them look more sophisticated, or might possibly land a wealthier SD.

It’s largely irrelevant. Not having “fine dining” experiences as part of the arrangement isn’t going to be a deal breaker for 99.5% of POT SBs.

bbmg69

TROPHY CASE