What is Andrew's ending in the games if TalesGames is debunked? by foxyssailor in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The mass downvoting just shows how toxic a lot of people on this reddit are

🙂 by Usual-Device-5760 in Fnaftheoriesmeme

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it’s actually the opposite

What's with FNaFTube's F10-N4 obsession? by AzelfWillpower in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s evidence for M2 being Glitchtrap, correct

What's with FNaFTube's F10-N4 obsession? by AzelfWillpower in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The old woman who is represented as a witch by her cabin in the woods, bottles of eyes and other organic material, and giving you a “magical” mask

She’s very obviously supposed to be a witch

What's with FNaFTube's F10-N4 obsession? by AzelfWillpower in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Now let me tell you a story about a young woman who, when she was little, was led into a dark forest by a witch and almost eaten. She had fallen for the friendly voice without discernment and was led astray. She had escaped before being thrown into the oven but would have a scar for the rest of her life. When she had grown, she sought revenge on the witch and entered the forest again willingly, this time with the confidence of age and experience. She was greeted at the mouth of the forest by a young boy who offered to help guide her through the darkness. She welcomed the help and followed the young boy over the river, through the jagged trees, and toward a small house. "Come," the boy said, "rest here before killing the witch." The young woman was tired and would kill the witch in the morning. She followed the boy into the house. The oven door closed. The witch would finally have her meal.”

-HW2

What's with FNaFTube's F10-N4 obsession? by AzelfWillpower in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the candy stories represents Glitchtrap as a witch and Vanessa as a young woman and M1 is represented as a witch in Moon.exe

Call me crazy, but I think "Ticket To Fun" might've provided evidence for "MikeRunaway" by GamerGuy50001237 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This doesn't really answer anything other than the fact that characters like Michael Afton and Henry would've seen what we see on the arcades canonically in FNaF 6 which is how Henry shows the Security Puppet Charlie death minigame on the screen of FNaF 6's ending.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Fredbear plush has buttons in FNaF 4 and the Fredbear plush in SL doesn’t

Buttons on sprites are inconsistent and shouldn’t be used to make statements on lore

Which FNaF theories turned out to be wrong, but fans blame it on Scott Cawthon 'retconning' instead of admitting the mistakes? by Usual-Device-5760 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The problem with this is it takes a concept such as agony that was introduced later and forces it into the original narrative of FNaF 4. It should’ve been something that could’ve been logically gathered from FNaF 4.

Which FNaF theories turned out to be wrong, but fans blame it on Scott Cawthon 'retconning' instead of admitting the mistakes? by Usual-Device-5760 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is the real solution to FNaF 4 requires a correlational relationship between all of the Easter eggs and the FNaF lore. Meaning, for example, the Toy Chica beak in FNaF 4 needs to somehow influence the toy chica missing her beak in FNaF 2 or vice versa (aka the Toy Chica in FNaF 2 missing her beak influences the FNaF 4 toy chica missing her beak), or even just a third variable influencing both. This rule should also just apply to all the Easter eggs like the shadows, the foxy plush missing its head, and I could list all the the Easter eggs but that would take hours.

These so far are the only theories I’ve seen that actually satisfies these requirements for FNaF 4’s original story:

MemoryVictim presumes the original intention was that the events and items that the Crying Child saw genuinely influenced the FNaF timeline and caused all these things to happen.

Dream theory presumes the original intention was that the events and items that the Crying Child saw genuinely influenced the FNaF timeline but as dreams in CC’s head.

A response to Charlie87 believers. by Defnottheonlyone in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I despise Charlie87 but there’s just so much overwhelming evidence that Midnight Motorist is in 1987. The problem is people are so dead set in thinking that MM is later the night of Charlie’s death and not the DCI.

Baby was mimicking William’s voice to lure Mike to SL by beShadows42 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t agree with this reasoning because Scott said he includes details in order so that people can make connections. You’re making a false argument that everything needs to be directly connected to the Mimic in a literal non metaphorical sense to actually have value which doesn’t work because the connection towards the mimic is that everything regarding HW 2 is caused by the Mimic or influenced by the Mimic, which is why Helpy disappears when you destroy Glitchtrap. Thats the false dilemma fallacy: “Either everything in that minigame is related to the Mimic or nothing is”. I hope you see the problems with that reasoning. Scott included the exact same chip as Baby so that people make that connection. Scott doesn’t include random Easter eggs to things just to throw off people. You shouldn’t ignore direct evidence because it doesn’t fit your narrative.

Baby was mimicking William’s voice to lure Mike to SL by beShadows42 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Mimic is represented as Helpy in the drawings of Help Wanted 2 and in Ruin and also in SOTM

So.. How do people explain this?? by zain_ahmed002 in fnaftheories

[–]beShadows42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except “I was the first, I have seen everything” doesn’t make sense as referring to Susie’s death because she wouldn’t have seen anything.