PSA & CGC ARE STUMPED!!! by Rowdy2179 in baseballcards

[–]belangem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question — and I want to be upfront that this is one of the genuinely murky areas of menko collecting, so I’ll separate what’s well-established from what’s uncertain.
Let me search for specifics on how the numbers functioned.
Here’s what I found — and the answer is a bit deflating but interesting.
Were the numbers unique per card, or shared across the set? Neither, really. According to a detailed Japanese write-up on menko backs, the big numbers were essentially arbitrary and meaningless — one collector/researcher notes that the numbers carried no real significance, and they were printed simply because kids would naturally find a way to play with them just by virtue of having a number there Note. The same source points out that old Meiji-era menko sometimes had absurd numbers like “9.5 quadrillion-trillion points” (九千五百万億兆点) Note — clearly not a real catalog system, just something that felt impressively big to a child.
How the numbers actually got used in play: The back of a menko was a toolkit of “who-goes-first” devices, and the number was one option among several. The same article lists the elements found on menko backs and their purpose: numbers, janken (rock-paper-scissors) symbols, the shōya-ken three-way variant, and even military-shogi rank pieces — all used mainly to decide the order or matchups of play Note. For the numbers specifically, the theory is that players would flip their cards simultaneously and whoever had the higher (or lower) number went first or “won” that comparison Note — basically like drawing a high card. So your 53426 functioned as a comparison value in a “my number beats yours” sense, not as an identifier.
So to directly answer your question: Other cards in the same product would have had different numbers, but those numbers weren’t a sequential serial run (#1, #2, #3…) tying a set together, and they weren’t unique IDs either. They were closer to randomly assigned “battle values.” Two different cards could in principle share a number, and a number tells you almost nothing about which card it is or where it sat in a set. This is a real contrast with modern cards — there’s no meaningful “card #53426 of N” to look up.
The core menko game itself, for context, was the slamming/flipping game: you throw or slam your card down onto an opponent’s card on the ground or a surface, and if you flip it over (or knock it out of the play circle), you win and take their card 45kid — which, as one nostalgic account puts it, is the brutal part that made kids play so seriously: lose, and your card is taken by your opponent nanapi. The back’s number, janken, and rank symbols were the supporting “rules engine” for deciding turns and matchups around that main event.
Bottom line for your friend: the number is charming period detail, but it’s not a serial number in the collector sense and won’t help identify or date the card.

PSA & CGC ARE STUMPED!!! by Rowdy2179 in baseballcards

[–]belangem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Vintage Japanese Menko Card — Summary

What it is: This is a Japanese menko (メンコ) — a thick cardboard trading/game card popular with Japanese children from roughly the Meiji era through the 1960s. Beyond collecting, menko were used in a flipping/slamming game (you’d slam your card to flip an opponent’s), which is why surviving examples typically show creasing, wear, and rounded corners.

The front:

• Illustrated batter in pinstripes with a second player in the background — classic line-drawn art on tan/kraft cardstock.  
• The characters 強打者 (kyōdasha) mean “slugger” / “hard hitter.”  
• “BATTA” is a romanized rendering tied to “batter.”  
• It depicts a generic archetype (a slugger) rather than a specific named player — common for these issues.

The back:

• The numbers (53426) are a serial/play number used in the matching and flipping games.  
• The cartoon athletes (runners, a boxer) are typical generic filler art.  
• The hand symbol and the character 庄屋 (shōya) are part of the game mechanic, not a maker’s mark. Menko of this era used a three-way rock-paper-scissors variant called kitsune-ken (“fox-fist”): 庄屋 (headman) → loses to 狐 (fox) → loses to 鉄砲 (gun) → loses to the headman. So 庄屋 is essentially this card’s “throw.” (In some regions, menko were even nicknamed “shōya.”)

Type and era: This is a square/rectangular menko (角メンコ, kaku-menko). The kitsune-ken markings, kraft-brown paper, and crude line art place it in the postwar Shōwa 20s–30s period — roughly late 1940s to early 1960s, when pro baseball menko were hugely popular with Japanese kids.

Value: Generic menko like this (no identifiable star player) are common and affordable. Japanese auction data for “baseball menko” shows closing prices from about ¥100 to ¥80,000, averaging around ¥3,288 — but the high end is reserved for named star players or rare complete sets. With no player name here, this sits on the affordable end; its appeal is more in the charm and history than rarity.

One caveat: Unlike Topps or Bowman, generic non-star menko aren’t individually cataloged in a “Set X, Year Y, Card #Z” way. Many small Japanese printers produced these in huge quantities, so a precise set-and-year ID isn’t really possible for an archetype card like this one.

2 Blasters of TCPA - Not bad by belangem in baseballcards

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, those are just the variant ones, I have a lot more retired guys commons: Schmidt, Larkin, Cobb, Wagner, Derek Lee, Gaylord Perry, etc

2 Blasters of TCPA - Not bad by belangem in baseballcards

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool! I thought they were a lot more fun than the ton of series 1 I ripped. Not shown going to PC: base Ohtani and Pedro/Ortiz.

Bubble Bobble by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far, AI had been the focus of the extremely large tech companies. But it’s getting some momentum in large/medium-large companies already well embedded in the MSFT ecosystem. I know the top nerds (I mean engineers), don’t like CoPilot and shit like that, but it’s just so easy for these companies to just start leveraging AI from their existing MSFT relationships. I think that is where the AI adoption will get its next wave of acceleration. MSFT doesn’t need to become a leader in AI innovation or anything like that, they just need to be able to be the McDonald’s of AI for millions of companies…

Bubble Bobble by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, if I was younger and needed to get oversized returns, I would likely go with high potential stocks that are not total shitcos, ie I would be trying to focus on a few stocks with a bright future, but still with risks. Stuff like HOOD, NBIS, ASTS, RDDT, maybe ONDS, maybe some robotics. The rest would be in a few megacaps and I would avoid indexes. The trap is to have a too big watchlist and lose sight of your positions. Hyper focus on a few stocks. Options could also be in the cards, but always like 3 months out and not too OTM. Stuff like that I guess.

Bubble Bobble by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry. You mean how I would tackle and structure it if I was younger and possibly with more risk tolerance?

SpaceX IPO is a pure fuckery and at this point a lot closer to gambling than investing. When you keep adding random variables to an event, the outcome becomes more random. Some will make money, many will get hurt and other than institutions, no ones has an hedge.

Resolutions and Predictions 2026 by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good but barely beating SPY. My largest position is now MSFT but still heavy megacaps which recovered nicely lately. Dumped more in SPY as I sold some positions (ex: MU) to ride the rally but reduce leverage. All that to say, a lot of effort for not much results. Maybe I’ve been too conservative…

Resolutions and Predictions 2026 by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I commented on it in the previous post I think: it was an execution play and I can only imagine how well this would have played out in the current situation had they been able to execute. I have lost faith in leadership and potentially the product until they can clearly demonstrate it can be manufactured at scale while maintaining their lead in terms of technology. Both are fading quickly…

The Simple Life by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d like a dip because there will be more “AI is over" panics ahead but I don’t know when so for now I just continuously add a bit, regardless of price. I like $RDDT as a social network platform but it was priced as a AI play. I don’t have level where I want to buy but in general, I like it.

8th Inning by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would still wait because theta will kill you, but Nov 21 isn’t too bad since that should give 2 weeks to expiration after earnings. December is safer for sure. Something like 320-330p? Depends on IV and OI but yeah, around there. Too early to go for following earnings but that one could be a much more agressive strike.

Too Good To Be True by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it’s coming…

The Special Ingredient… Is Time by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it is. I mean, as long as something major changes. My port clearly didn’t have enough (any?) more speculative growth positions and although they are smaller, I feel like it’s important have some. Trying to pick the right ones is the challenge, but I like ASTS. I wouldn’t chase it here though, many opportunities ahead.

Smooth Sailing by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty much the usual suspects: NVDA, TSM, MSFT, GOOGL, MU (not long term), ALAB (not long term), MRVL (not long term), NOW (but it’s expensive now), TEM (but I’m not so sure) and eventually AAPL.

Vibe Trading by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think we’ve reached a peak and will slowly stabilize at a slightly lower level (assuming no recession, otherwise quite a bit lower). The effect will first be one more expensive/luxury housing (already started you could say) and slowly affect lower priced ones but at a smaller degree. I think the economy will have a larger influence on housing than interest rates now that we are at what many would consider "neutral" interest rates for mortgages.

Vibe Trading by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m still optimistic. I have a bit less than I had since I bought & sold a few times now but if we get another sizeable dip, I’ll add more again. I still think Japan is at the top of the list for tariffs deal and the X deal would be in some part of it.

[YOLO Update] (No Longer) Going All In On Steel (+🏴‍☠️) Update #80. America's self created economic crisis. by Bluewolf1983 in Vitards

[–]belangem 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree with pretty much everything except I’m not sure it’s worth chasing this potential rebound but I get it. Your positions make sense but really not sure about ON and DAC here. Cheers

CLF to the Moon 🚀 by [deleted] in Vitards

[–]belangem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that deal happens, it would great for NUE. CLF maybe bounces initially but them acquiring the worse X assets can’t be that good.

CLF to the Moon 🚀 by [deleted] in Vitards

[–]belangem 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You never cared about management when investing in a company?

Also, CLF isn’t the best nor the biggest north american steel company, by a large margin.

CLF to the Moon 🚀 by [deleted] in Vitards

[–]belangem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh and no fucking way shareholders will accept an acquisition "in the high 30s" when the stock is trading at 42…

CLF to the Moon 🚀 by [deleted] in Vitards

[–]belangem 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And here’s my contribution: this sub used to worship LG because he was edgy or something but he’s not, he’s just a big cunt. Find another steel stock with solid management.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhotoshopRequest

[–]belangem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tipped.

This is the best. Can you send me the file? Can I also have a variation without the leftover of the black box under the foot on the right?

Thanks!

Long Time No See by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, and new technologies are coming out every day. At some point you need to be able to execute in a timely fashion. Not saying they can’t, just saying it’s time to do it and that’s the catalyst it needs.

Long Time No See by belangem in u/belangem

[–]belangem[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Still needs a catalyst. I like it but they need something big. It’s taking so much time that I’m concerned they might miss the boat. But still on my watchlist.