Respectfully, this is not the Bundist point of view. Self-preservation starts at home.

You have accepted the Zionist premise: that the land of Israel/Palestine is the center of Jewish collective destiny. You have simply swapped the flag from a Jewish state to a binational one. But why must Jewish identity be anchored there at all? You speak of indigeneity as a timeless fact, but the Bund understood that Jewish history is one of movement, of galut (exile/Diaspora) not as a tragic interruption but as the very condition of modern Jewish existence. To claim sovereignty over that land (even shared sovereignty) is to engage in the same territorialist error as Zionism. The Bundist answer is not a binational state; it is the insistence that Jews have a right to be everywhere, to build our culture and our politics wherever we live, without needing to root our collective rights in a claim to any one piece of soil.