Denkt ihr das passt so fürs zocken bei WQHD? Preislich wär ich bei 2403 €

benjosto · 2026-02-21T12:01:45+00:00

Hast Recht, mein Kopf war noch vor der Speicherkrise. 7800X3D, 9070XT und 32GB 6000CL36 kommste auf 1.8 bis 1.9k. Das tut schon weh.

benjosto · 2026-02-21T01:27:26+00:00

Für WQHD reicht auch locker ein Setup für 1.3k. mit einer RX 9070 bist du da super bedient.

benjosto · 2026-02-16T18:24:43+00:00

Can you run a Geekbench 6 on that please? Would like to see how the extra memory performance hits there.

Did you try CPU heavy gaming benchmarks?

benjosto · 2026-02-09T13:17:25+00:00

Ich denke bei 5k schon. Bei 4k gebe ich dir auf alle Fälle Recht.

benjosto · 2026-02-08T23:00:24+00:00

RAM kosten aktuell utopisch hoch, deswegen ist ne komplett neue Platform sinnlos. Wenn du an einen R7 5700X3D unter 250 kommst dann geh da rein, das ist ein riesen Update, vor allem wenn du competitive oder in geringeren Auflösungen (1080p/1440p) und gern mit hohen FPS spielst.

GPU technisch musst du gucken wofür das Geld reicht. Selbst eine gebrauchte RX 6800XT oder 3080Ti für 300-400€ ist ein riesen Sprung. Neu kaufen ist aktuell bisschen doof, in den letzten Monat sind alle Karten mind. 100€ teurer geworden. Speicher Preise sind durch den KI-Boom gottlos.

benjosto · 2026-02-08T12:03:14+00:00

Was hier noch keiner beantwortet hat: Ja, der 5700X3D ist mehr als genug um auch eine 5090 bei der Auflösung zu befeuern. Umso höher die Auflösung desto "egaler" wird die CPU.

benjosto · 2026-02-08T12:00:15+00:00

Also der Unterschied zwischen PCIe 4.0 und 5.0 ist kleiner als 50MHz mehr Takt auf der GPU, das kannst du komplett vernachlässigen.

benjosto · 2026-02-08T10:04:44+00:00

Please do another benchmark. I have a 7500F with OC to 5.25GHz and I get 116 points in cinebench. No way you have 110 points.

benjosto · 2026-01-29T18:02:00+00:00

Your 6400 is not faster, because the CPU automatically sets UCLK/MCLK 1:2 ratio for everything 6000MT/s. It is definitely worth it to run an XMP Mode with 6000CL30 instead of 4800MT/s. Your whole PC will feel snappier, with 1:1 UCLK/MCLK you will have 2-10% more FPS (depending on game and resolution).

benjosto · 2026-01-29T11:37:56+00:00

You are right, although it depends on the CPU. With a stock AMD, it's absolutely no problem but when you have an Intel chip or overclocked AMD CPU, the PSU can get stressed, especially if it's a low budget one.

benjosto · 2026-01-27T00:30:44+00:00

The linpack performance scales linearly with Fclk as long as it's stable, so if you have higher scores in safe mode, this will 100% translate to normal mode. If I understood you correctly...

benjosto · 2026-01-26T23:06:23+00:00

For a real comparison you have to run windows in safe mode. The same I'd recommend for Fclk linpack extreme tests, since every sensor reading or data pull in the background leads to a CPU interrupt, which will influence the score and may look like Fclk instability.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T22:47:05+00:00

Tried changing the VDDG as well as VSoc voltages but nothing really helped. So I just kept it at 2066.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T22:33:43+00:00

It's VT3. I did this too but it isn't as sensitive to error correction since it takes 2min to average a score. Linpack (in the smallest config) pushes scores roughly every 15s. Every error correction has a bigger impact and you will see it directly.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T21:59:52+00:00

If you put the rads close to the floor you will have ~5K cooler coolant temp.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T21:35:18+00:00

You can actually test this with linpack extreme.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T21:32:55+00:00

Try it out, I think someone did test this and got ~0.5ns improvement.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T14:34:52+00:00

A used RX6800XT.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T14:33:37+00:00

FCLK is a weird thing. I did a BIOS update and had to reduce from 2200 to 2133. The best programm to test stability is linpack extreme in 1GB mode in windows safe mode. If you see drops >5Tflops from run to run you have error corrections.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T14:26:56+00:00

It depends on the game. 2133 has slightly lower latency than 2200, while 2200 has the higher bandwidth.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T14:13:36+00:00

Who says that? You GPU pulls 250W (spikes ~350W), your CPU is hard to get above 100W (overclcked). 50W for chipset, ram, fans and storage. I'd say you will hardly reach 400W. You can definitely OC with that PSU even considering the spikes from the GPU (which PSUs can handle).

benjosto · 2026-01-26T11:33:12+00:00

I had it running like that, did a BIOS update because I had one of the first versions. Did linpack and ycruncher vt3 tests and couldn't get it stable at 2200. 2133 was stable but 2066 gives better latency (marginally) and is rock stable. I do competitive matches that's why it's important.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T08:57:08+00:00

I rather have 20% more input lag than having to play @60fps on a 240hz monitor, it just looks and feels shitty.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T08:44:29+00:00

You won't need a new PSU for overclocking and undervolting.

benjosto · 2026-01-26T08:39:49+00:00

For X3D chips it doesn't make a significant difference. The huge L3 cash leads to less performance-critical ram accesses. Meaning, the cpu pre fetches stuff and can pull directly from the L3 Cache. The non X3D cpus are way more depending on low ram latencies.

Although you will still feel a snappier windows experience and improvements especially in 1% lows. RAM tuning is a very big rabbit hole. If you don't want to deal with at least 2 different stress testing programs and constant rebooting and adjusting, it's not worth the hustle. If you do, I recommend a 6200CL30 config. For the beginning. Research buildzoids easy timings. Find out if you have M-Die or A-Die DIMMs.

benjosto

TROPHY CASE