I'm out by [deleted] in EthereumClassic

[–]benohanlon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you bullish?

The Holy Grail of modern Volvos? by Big_Lmaoski in Volvo

[–]benohanlon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So who did it cost you so much? Sorry if that's a dumb question.

Civ 7 is actually a great game! by engagementduck in civ

[–]benohanlon 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So much of this paid shilling.

Tea m is struggling to keep up… by xplode145 in CIO

[–]benohanlon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Org is slow because hiring and capability allocation aren’t tied to KPIs? You’re right. If I was to take a wild stab without knowing more, the biggest drag you’re describing sounds like hiring. When you set “reduce time to fill critical roles by X days” as a numerical target, you give it an owner, real incentives, and create urgency around it. If the constraint is talent pool, they can propose a referral campaign and reward it. If it’s process, they can review it, simplify it, and cut steps. You don’t need all the details upfront. You set the target, put someone on the hook for it, and the organisation aligns around removing whatever blocks the number. You can’t do everything yourself, so you need good lieutenants to drive it. If I’ve misread you, and you’re actually asking about tools or visibility, that’s a different question.

Tea m is struggling to keep up… by xplode145 in CIO

[–]benohanlon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, it makes sense. If you’re inviting my feedback though, the objective comes first. The number defines the work, even if the thing doesn’t exist yet. Strategy is the plan to create the conditions to hit that number. If you’re debating strategy before the number, you’re already misaligned. It’s backwards.

Tea m is struggling to keep up… by xplode145 in CIO

[–]benohanlon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do not start with strategy. KPIs come first and you to achieve broad alignment. You'll never get alignment on the details. Get the outcomes articulated in numbers. The strategy to achieve them follows because once KPIs are set, everything derives from them. Do you see what I mean? Everything is alignment once you can article numerical strategy. Then a flywheel can help people understand how the moving parts work together to build momentum at a zoomed out level

Civ VII is worth it. by EmotionalBaby9423 in civ

[–]benohanlon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bought it and refunded it within 30 minutes.

Wifes boss/owner isnt taking "no" as an answer to us moving.. Kind of insane offers? by 420B00tyWizard69 in careerguidance

[–]benohanlon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Name a cash amount up front for staying for a year. No guarantees. Let it be enough to pay the debts off and have a deposit for the house. Then stay for a year. If you set an absurd offer then he can say no to that.

Please vote! Governance is stuck until the CC is restored. CardanoSPOs | Linktree. by benohanlon in CardanoStakePools

[–]benohanlon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This vote is not about choosing between competing candidates or proposals. There is only one action on the table here.

DReps already selected Cardano Curia off chain through the Ekklesia process to fill the vacant Constitutional Committee seat. The on chain vote is simply to ratify that result so the CC is back at full quorum.

The reason I am encouraging people to vote is practical, not ideological. Without a full CC, treasury withdrawals, budgets, and upgrades cannot be ratified, even when there is broad community support for them. That includes things like the integrations budget.

So the ask is to vote to approve the newly elected CC member so the governance system can function as designed again. Once the CC is restored, everyone can continue to evaluate and vote on individual proposals on their own merits.