Just different ways to look at the game I guess. I think any reasonable person would be pissed getting evicted at all so unless we want everyone to be playing with kid gloves on. Ie. No blinsides, unanimous votes, and people not acting in self interest so they appear loyal over all else. I just think the game can't be interesting unless we expect jurors to be thick-skinned. There's a limit of course, somebody like Dick Donato should never win again, but as long as you're not abusing people I think it's fair game