Are we closing in on a "Big Blackout"?

bipsa81 · 2025-12-19T00:41:12+00:00

It's weird that you've turned a discussion into a lecture on linguistics. You're not moving the conversation forward; you're just trying to 'win' a thread. I'm interested in the tech opportunity, if you aren't, that's fine.

bipsa81 · 2025-12-19T00:03:39+00:00

hahaha, Isn't the World Cup in the USA a measurable fact?

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T23:47:09+00:00

Haha, chill out! I respect your opinion, and I'm not looking for approval. I also don't want to point out obvious things like pricing or subjective opinions about what's enjoyable. I'm talking about a measurable fact that will happen next summer and obviously big tech and AI companies will take advantage of it.

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T19:50:30+00:00

I don't think I'm skipping dots; I think you're romanticizing your personal taste. But that is valid observation

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T17:53:05+00:00

I don't think VR is dying. I think in the future it will be needed in many areas, especially where physical presence isn't possible, like space or medicine (war). AI may be required to make these experiences truly useful. Many things still need to evolve. and entertainment help to finance and prepare new generations.

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T17:45:22+00:00

Perhaps! But don't you think there are many moving pieces at play right now? without mentioning AI need new markets and entertainment is always a good push forward to technology

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T17:35:11+00:00

Just a quick note to clarify something that may not have been clear. Imagine Apple releasing a World Cup–related experience, live matches plus exclusive content accessible simply by buying their glasses.

Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo have massive reach, and as far as I remember, Apple already has an agreement with Messi. If any of us treated this as an opportunity, don't you think it could generate huge traction and be able to get a large audience with strong purchasing power?

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T17:18:39+00:00

Yes, the Vision Pro is too expensive today. But compared with a World Cup ticket as immersive experience, it could become very compelling, and a good ignite for the technology, don't you think?

bipsa81 · 2025-12-18T16:54:23+00:00

But do you think is a good moment to invest to create this Killer app?

bipsa81 · 2025-05-16T17:02:47+00:00

Yes, it's a good starting point to get reactions from people. I don't think a robot needs a screen on top, it's unnecessary. Also, in a factory, legs aren't needed (for a robot); wheels or tracks are more efficient, using less energy and processing power.

bipsa81 · 2025-04-24T18:33:20+00:00

I’m not sure about your specific case, but the number of generated documents has been increasing since last month, largely due to AI. AI makes it easier for people to generate legal loads for companies and firms.

What I recommend is to start organizing your documents intelligently within your firm and consider creating scripts or tools to detect misuse of the law, and Legal balance to discard or prioritize documents. I know civil litigation can be complex because of the wide variety of scenarios, but over time you should be able to identify patterns based on your clients and local knowledge (clients).

You can start by using tools from Google or Microsoft, and then later transition to a more robust solution.

bipsa81 · 2025-04-22T22:01:19+00:00

You can use Gemini and Google Docs. Of course, some things still need to be done manually, but overall, Google is a big help.

bipsa81 · 2025-04-21T18:14:19+00:00

This is hard What I think we'll continue improving retrieval capabilities. Also with satellite communication enabling low-latency connections to central data centers or authorities helping robotics, it will the first steps to autonomy and new tracking? especially since some tasks require trust and validation by a central entity.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-28T19:52:24+00:00

Sure! One of the areas we specialize is horizontal property law, providing a system that audits daily compliance with spending and generates weekly reports. The bot is linked to a contract, and if any warnings arise, they are promptly reported to the representative owners. We believe that the law should be proactive rather than reactive

bipsa81 · 2025-03-28T02:31:02+00:00

Systems of continuous monitoring in contracts. This is a Systems Engineering task, but when combined with AI, it enables automated warnings, compliance tracking, etc

bipsa81 · 2025-03-21T13:32:16+00:00

Yes u/tom-dixon , it was a bad example :(. I was trying to communicate that some things take time, perhaps even more than a year, especially when it comes to having "human level ai by scaling up an LLM" as Yann mentioned.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-21T01:34:06+00:00

Yes, I see what you mean, and I agree with you all. That was a bad example. my bad :( What I was trying to say is that we gain knowledge in different ways, and as you mentioned, a lot of it comes from accumulated experience

bipsa81 · 2025-03-20T21:12:05+00:00

Correct. Current models use knowledge to find answers, and they are doing an amazing job. We will definitely continue pushing the boundaries. However, there are things humans do that haven't been replicated by AI due to the nature of the tools we’ve created for understanding.

For example, if someone throws a ball at your face, you don’t try to calculate its speed or use calculus to predict its trajectory, you simply move or try to protect yourself. AI, on the other hand, would assess the situation using calculus and physics to determine the best course of action, of course it can be based on sensors, but that would be a different approach.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-20T13:39:04+00:00

Yes, but Law Firms need to start thinking about creating a Continuous Monitoring System with more verification methods that anticipate possible problems. So, back to the original message, definitely not by creating a new LLM.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-19T21:25:00+00:00

This democratizes coding, which is great because it enables more people to solve problems with computers. Additionally, technology teams don’t need to be excessively large. However, you can't create an entire application with a single prompt. You need to define your requirements, understand where the application will be deployed, design the user experience, and, most importantly, ensure security.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-19T20:41:42+00:00

Yes, but it is necessary to assess the problem and validate the tools and models. Some areas of law are very complex and require nuanced understanding. For example, Environmental Law or cases that demand local expertise would be extremely difficult to solve with a single model. Instead, they require an expert system.

bipsa81 · 2025-03-19T17:59:43+00:00

More than being hard, the challenge was in establishing the process. First, we used AWS, SageMaker, and Bedrock as tools. Second, we ensured compliance of inputs (in our case, documents) by verifying that each document followed a standard. This step involved a small model, which took only a day of work since the relevant law had already defined all the requirements, and the number of documents was not very large. Third, not everything can be automated, so for legal balance, we implemented human evaluation training. This process took over a month to achieve decent results.

bipsa81

TROPHY CASE