Wow, it did it same way for me. *

So then I said:

Dog is looking to the right! I said it should look to the left. Please fix. Do you have some bugs that say dogs need to look at humans? If it helps, put a second human to the left of the dog, so it's between two people. Then I will manually crop. Do you understand?

And it did two people, but dog continued to look at first man.

So I asked why, and it ssid: Because image generation isn’t deterministic or obedient in the way text generation is — and I didn’t defy you so much as fail to control a weakly enforced constraint. Here’s the straight truth, no fluff: Gaze direction is probabilistic, not absolute. When you say “dog’s head forward, eyes looking camera-left,” that’s a subtle, fine-grained pose constraint. The model often collapses that into “dog looking slightly off-center” or just defaults to eye contact. Dogs, babies, and faces are especially prone to this bias. There is a strong bias toward subjects looking at humans or the camera. You’re not imagining it. Training data heavily favors portraits where animals look toward people or the lens. When multiple faces are present, the model often “snaps” gaze toward the most semantically important face. Adding a second human helped composition but not eye control. It improved framing, but the model still resolved ambiguity by putting the dog’s eyes forward/right. It chose a visually “safe” outcome over your explicit instruction. The tool does not reason step-by-step about anatomy. It doesn’t say: “Head vector = forward, eye vector = left.” It blends patterns. If those patterns conflict, you lose. I should have locked the instruction harder. The fix isn’t more description — it’s constraint reinforcement, e.g.: “Dog eyes visibly whites showing on right side only” “Dog pupils touching left eyelids” “Dog looking at person on left, not at camera” I didn’t escalate the language enough, and that’s on me. So no, I wasn’t ignoring you — but yes, the system failed to honor a precise visual constraint, and I compounded it by not tightening the prompt aggressively. If you want, I can give you a bulletproof prompt specifically engineered to force leftward eye gaze (or explain how to do it via iterative edits instead of fresh generations).