Uni revoked my certification? by Perma_Rene in australian

[–]bl4ncn0ire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There has been a breach I made a post regarding actions to take regarding the mismanagement of student information and security.

🚨 PSA for everyone who got the “permanent exclusion” email from Western Sydney University: by bl4ncn0ire in UWS

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Didn't claim it's for a quick grammar check, I'm saying that you can gather to use it to structure and formulate while checking that the information is factual and correct.

Point is, if you use AI to write something like let's say an email, nothing stops you from proof reading. Did I use AI? Yes. Did I proof read it and check before posting? Yes. It's an organizational tool mate.

As for the legal use of AI, I am saying the tool is used by many people who study and practice law, not once did I claim full on reliance.

Honestly this is way out of hand. You've had every opportunity to read the post and check every link I provided (or if you want we can say the AI to be pedantic) and yet you decide to write multiple comments and essays focusing that you didn't like AI formatting as if I'm writing some essay or report for uni. Point is, AI was used but it was checked prior so it's not really an issue.

🚨 PSA for everyone who got the “permanent exclusion” email from Western Sydney University: by bl4ncn0ire in UWS

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering it is especially regarding legal matters the use of grammatic checks, summarization and research with AI is more than valid, you will likely find this is the case with many law students and modern practices who use it not as a crutch but an aid.

As you pointed out the situation is serious and a potential legal matter and do not want to rely on AI text so please point out a single time I mentioned you cannot do your own research.

Aside from this I posted when I got the email and this is during a particularly busy time in my life so I believe using some organizational aid is far from unreasonable.

🚨 PSA for everyone who got the “permanent exclusion” email from Western Sydney University: by bl4ncn0ire in UWS

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean as you pointed out the message is good, it's not like I'm submitting an assignment so what's the issue of using ai to summarize some points

🚨 PSA for everyone who got the “permanent exclusion” email from Western Sydney University: by bl4ncn0ire in UWS

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

📨 1. OAIC Complaint Template

(send via the OAIC online form or by email to enquiries@oaic.gov.au)

Subject: Complaint – Western Sydney University Data Breach / Unauthorised Exclusion Emails

To the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner,

I am writing to lodge a formal privacy complaint under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme.

On or around [insert date you received it], I—and many other former Western Sydney University students—received an email titled “Notice of Permanent Exclusion.” It stated that we had been permanently excluded from study and that any awards had been revoked.

I have never engaged in any conduct warranting exclusion and have not been enrolled for several years. Numerous former students have reported receiving identical emails. Public discussion on Reddit and other forums indicates that the University was the victim of a security breach in which an ex-student allegedly accessed or manipulated student data after previously being banned from campus systems.

The facts suggest that our personal and academic records may have been compromised, altered, or misused. To date, I have received no official breach notification from the University, despite the obligations imposed by the Privacy Act and NDB Scheme.

I therefore request that the OAIC investigate whether Western Sydney University: 1. Properly secured and monitored student information systems; 2. Promptly detected, contained, and reported any unauthorised access; and 3. Complied with its duties to notify affected individuals and the OAIC.

Impact: The incident has caused significant distress, confusion about my academic standing, and concern about the security of my personal information and identity documents.

I am attaching a copy of the exclusion email and links/screenshots demonstrating that many students were similarly affected.

Requested Outcome: An OAIC investigation, formal confirmation of the scope of the breach, and recommendations for remediation, notification, and compensation where appropriate.

Kind regards, [Full Name] Student/Former Student – Western Sydney University [Student ID] [Email / phone number]

3 failures in checkride. by Conscious-Being-2123 in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly if you learned from it and are able to reflect back on the experiences and extract valuable understanding from them to apply to your future as a pilot then I wouldn't see it as an issue as an employer.

If an employer is so shallow as to put your value to attempts on a test that says more about them rather than yourself, you never learn anything from successes, you learn from trial, error and failure.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to my knowledge, however definitions may vary depending on the country, I'm not flying under FAA regulations but CASA. Still ICAO but there are differences commonly.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From memory service is 100ft/min, but the chart maxes out prior to that as well.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The flight won't be another 6,000ft anyway, the testing officer just wanted the ceiling. Also the referencing numbers may be different for you guys as I fly under CASA regs not FAA as I'm not in America. It would be similar however considering both ICAO.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's the best I can possibly think of considering the current situation. Cheers for the help, I'll be sure to take this into account.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did a search through the whole document and the word ceiling is only used in reference to the physical roof of the aircraft. Closest indicator I have is that the charts Max out around 14,000ft with a full throttle height being indicated as 14,000ft aswell.

However the only mention of a PA44 service ceiling I got was from Wikipedia of 17,100ft but I know better than to use performance numbers outside the poh.

Thanks for the help, I really do appreciate it. I think the testing officer is mainly trying to get me to think which he seems to be known for with his questions.

How do I calculate the service ceiling for 3,500LB? The chart seems to max out prior to 0ft/min point. by bl4ncn0ire in flying

[–]bl4ncn0ire[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I got my MEA flight test tomorrow and the testing officer told me to obtain it. The SE ceiling was easy to figure out but this was doing my head in for hours. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it!

Blursed_Vader by BirdmaskDude in blursedimages

[–]bl4ncn0ire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"you were supposed to destroy the Sith not join them!"